Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T12:48:33.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

MR ATTORNEY GENERAL AND THE POLITICIANS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 1997

R. A. MELIKAN
Affiliation:
St Catharine's College, Cambridge

Abstract

This article looks at the relationship between professional and political aspiration in Georgian England by examining the office of attorney general during the period 1714–1810. It argues that while the office offered a unique opportunity for a lawyer to combine a legal and political career, this was a formidable task and one rarely achieved. The generally hostile attitude toward lawyers in the house of commons was a significant obstacle. More important, however, were the complex and potentially conflicting expectations associated with the office of attorney. The relationship with the government was an awkward balance of loyalty and remoteness, whereby the attorney was encouraged to regard fellow ministers both as colleagues and as clients. Moreover, he owed a duty to parliament that was independent of, but inevitably linked to, his obligations to the crown. As a consequence of these various pressures attorneys tended to remain aloof from politics and interested primarily in their own professional advancement. The office of attorney general was less the stepping-stone to ministerial office than the reliable path to the bench.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1997 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I wish to thank Professor John Baker, Dr Boyd Hilton, and Professor Brian Simpson for their helpful comments and suggestions upon an earlier draft of this paper.