Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T10:54:22.600Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hegel on What Cannot Be Said: an Interpretation of the Ineffable in the Phenomenology's ‘Sense-Certainty’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2021

Ariën Voogt Open the ORCID record for Ariën Voogt [Opens in a new window]
Ariën Voogt*
Affiliation:
Protestant Theological University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands a.w.voogt@pthu.nl
Get access

Abstract

It is often claimed that Hegel's philosophy cannot accept that something would remain beyond the grasp of conceptual language, and that his thought therefore systematically represses the possibility that something cannot be said. By analysing Hegel's account of the ineffable in the ‘Sense-Certainty’ chapter of the Phenomenology of Spirit, this article argues that Hegel does not repress, but firmly confronts the problem of what cannot be said. With the help of Giorgio Agamben's linguistic interpretation, it is shown that Hegel's conception of the ineffable must be understood from the perspective of his dialectical understanding of language. What appears to be ineffable is only the constitutive result of the dialectical negation that conceptual discourse enacts. Consequently, the ineffable in Hegel's thought cannot be said to remain external to and independent from conceptual language.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hegel Bulletin , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , August 2022 , pp. 220 - 241
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Hegel Society of Great Britain

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorno, T. W. (1983), Negative Dialectics, trans. Ashton, E. B.. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. W. (1993), Hegel: Three Studies, trans. Nicholsen, S. W.. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Agamben, G. (1991), Language and Death: the Place of Negativity, trans. Pinkus, K. E. and Hardt, M.. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, A. (2004), Negative Theology and Modern French Philosophy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brown, N., and Simmons, J. A. (eds.) (2017), Contemporary Debates in Negative Theology and Philosophy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, T. A. (1999), Indiscretion: Finitude and the Naming of God. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
de Boer, K. (2010), On Hegel: the Sway of the Negative. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feuerbach, L. (1975), ‘Zur Kritik der Hegelschen Philosophie’, in Thies, E. (ed.), Kritiken und Abhandlungen 2. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Finlayson, J. G. (2002), ‘Adorno on the Ethical and the Ineffable’, European Journal of Philosophy 10:1: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franke, W. (2007), On What Cannot Be Said: Modern and Contemporary Transformations. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Franke, W. (2014), A Philosophy of the Unsayable. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, H. S. (1997), Hegel's Ladder: the Pilgrimage of Reason. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Hyppolite, J. (1997), Logic and Existence, trans. Lawlor, L. and Sen, A.. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Jonas, S. (2013), ‘Against Metaphysics Running Amok: Hegel, Adorno and the Ineffable’, in Herzog, L. (ed.), Hegel's Thought in Europe: Currents, Crosscurrents and Undercurrents. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kettner, M. (1990), Hegel's ‘Sinnliche Gewißheit': diskursanalytischer Kommentar. Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
O'Regan, C. (1994), The Heterodox Hegel. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Simon, J. (1966), Das Problem der Sprache bei Hegel. Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (1975), Hegel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C. (1976), ‘The Opening Arguments of the Phenomenology’, in MacIntyre, A. (ed.), Hegel: a Collection of Critical Essays. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Vernon, J. (2007), Hegel's Philosophy of Language. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (2001), Philosophical Investigations: the German Text, with a Revised English Translation, trans. Anscombe, G. E. M.. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar