Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T02:09:59.067Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Embodied Meaning in Hegel and Merleau-Ponty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2017

David Ciavatta
David Ciavatta*
Affiliation:
Ryerson University, Canadadavid.ciavatta@ryerson.ca
Get access

Abstract

In this paper it is argued that the conceptions of embodied meaning and of intuition that Hegel appeals to in the Aesthetics anticipate some of Merleau-Ponty’s insights concerning the distinctive character of pre-conceptual, sensuous forms of meaning. It is argued that, for Hegel, our aesthetic experience of the beautiful is such that we cannot readily differentiate in it the purportedly distinct roles that sensation and thought play, and so that the account of sensuous intuition operative here differs from the one appealed to in more familiar, ‘intellectualist’ conceptions that are premised upon our being able to make such a distinction. Some of Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenological insights are brought to bear to help support and illuminate some of the implications of Hegel’s conception of such sensuously embodied meaning.

Type
Articles
Information
Hegel Bulletin , Volume 38 , Special Issue 1: Hegel and Phenomenology , May 2017 , pp. 45 - 66
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aristotle (1984), Generation of Animals, trans. A. Platt, in The Complete Works of Aristotle vol. 1, ed. J. Barnes. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bredlau, S. (2006), ‘Learning to See: Merleau-Ponty and the Navigation of “Terrains”’, Chiasmi International 8: 191–198.Google Scholar
Ciavatta, D. (2009), Spirit, the Family, and the Unconscious in Hegel’s Philosophy. Albany NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Ciavatta, D. ( forthcoming), ‘Hegel on the Parallels between Action and the Ontology of Life’.Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, D. (2007), ‘The Intentionality of Passive Experience: Husserl and a Contemporary Debate’, The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy 7: 1–18.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1978), Philosophy of Subjective Spirit, vol. 3, trans. M. J. Petry. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (2010), Science of Logic, trans. G. di Giovanni. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Houlgate, S. (2006), ‘Thought and Experience in Hegel and McDowell’, European Journal of Philosophy 14: 242–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houlgate, S. (2007), ‘Hegel on the Beauty of Sculpture’, in S. Houlgate (ed.), Hegel and the Arts. Evanston IL: Northwestern University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landes, D. (2013), Merleau-Ponty and the Paradoxes of Expression. New York: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar
Pippin, R. (2005), ‘Concept and Intuition. On Distinguishability and Separability’, Hegel-Studien 39: 25–39.Google Scholar
Pippin, R. (2014), After the Beautiful: Hegel and the Philosophy of Pictorial Modernism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Russon, J. (1993), ‘Reading and the Body in Hegel’, Clio 22:4: 321–336.Google Scholar
Russon, J. (1997), The Self and Its Body in Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, S. (2012), Hegel’s Critique of Kant: From Dichotomy to Identity. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (2010), ‘Hegel and the Philosophy of Action’, in A. Laitinen and C. Sandis (eds.), Hegel on Action. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar