Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-jbkpb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-15T03:19:23.537Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The ‘Problem’ With Nude Honorific Statuary and Portraits in Late Republican and Augustan Rome1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2009

Extract

In his seminal work, The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus, Paul Zanker wrote of a problem with nude honorific statuary in Late Republican Rome and of ‘conflict and contradiction’ in the style of Roman portraits during the same period. The ‘problem’ was a matter of nudity and style; it also had a moral dimension. Under political or social pressure, there was a tendency at Rome to express the effects of cultural change in moral terms: viz., literary works concerned with political or social attitudes of the Romans tended to describe elements like luxuria and adulatio(‘luxury’ and ‘sycophancy’) as ‘Greek and decadent in contrast to good, honest, ‘Roman’ values and traditions, such as virtus (‘courage’), fides (‘good faith’), and pietas (‘devotion’). Taking his cue from such attacks on aspects of the hellenization of Rome, Zanker gave a moral dimension to the ‘conflict and contradiction’ he discerned in the style of Roman honorific statues and portraits of the second and first centuries B.C. This idea that art can express moral values, even moral conflict, is of great interest and fundamental significance. The present paper focuses upon the way Zanker applies it to Late Republican statues and portraits in the light of recent scholarship. In particular, it will be argued, firstly, that the form of the art does not really make sense if there was as much conflict with Greek ideas and styles as generalizations from the literary sources might imply; secondly, that a nude or partially nude portrait statue of a living noble or emperor was not as problematic at Rome as is commonly believed; and thirdly, as a consequence, that Zanker's views about moral conflict in the style of Late Republican statues and portraits, and about the stylistic resolution of this ‘conflict’ under Augustus, should be substantially modified.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

J., Boardman (ed.), The Oxford History of Classical Art (Oxford, 1993).Google Scholar
Boschung, D., Die Bildnisse des Augustus (Berlin, 1993).Google Scholar
Breckenridge, J. D., ‘Origins of Roman Republican Portraiture: Relations with the Hellenistic World’, ANRW I, 4 (1973), 826–54.Google Scholar
Galinsky, K., Augustan Culture: an Interpretive Introduction (Princeton, 1996).Google Scholar
Giuliani, L., Bildnis und Botschaft (Frankfurt, 1986).Google Scholar
Gordon, R., ‘The Veil of Power: Emperors, Sacrificers and Benefactors’, Chap. 8 in Beard, M. and North, J. (edd.), Pagan Priests: Religion and Power in the Ancient World (Ithaca, 1990), 199231.Google Scholar
Gruen, E., Culture and National Identity in Republican Rome (Ithaca, 1992).Google Scholar
Gruen, E., ‘The Roman Oligarchy: Image and Perception’, in Linderski, J. (ed.), Imperium Sine Fine: T. Robert S. Broughton and the Roman Republic, Historia Einzelschriften 105 (Stuttgart, 1996), 215–34.Google Scholar
Gurval, R. A., Actium and Augustus: the Politics and Emotions of Civil War (Ann Arbor, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallett, C. H., The Roman Heroic Portrait, PhD Dissertation (Berkeley, 1993).Google Scholar
Hannestad, N., Roman Art and Imperial Policy (Aarhus, 1988).Google Scholar
Jauss, H. R., ‘Literary History as a Challenge to Literary Theory’, in Towards an Aesthetic of Reception, trans. Bahti, T. (Minneapolis, 1982), 345.Google Scholar
Kleiner, D. E. E., Roman Sculpture (New Haven, 1992).Google Scholar
Lahusen, G., Untersuchungen zur Ehrenstatue in Rom: Literarische und Epigraphische Zeugnisse (Rome, 1983).Google Scholar
Levick, B. M., ‘Morals, Politics, and the Fall of the Roman Republic’, G&R 29 (1982), 5362.Google Scholar
Lind, L. R., ‘Concept, Action and Character: the Reasons for Rome's Greatness’, TAPA 103 (1972), 235–83.Google Scholar
Lintott, A. W., ‘Imperial Expansion and Moral Decline in the Roman Republic’, Historia 21 (1972), 626–38.Google Scholar
MacMullen, R., ‘Hellenizing the Romans (2nd Century B.C.)’, Historia 40 (1991), 419–38.Google Scholar
Maggi, S., ‘Augusto e la politica delle immagini: lo Hüftmantehypus’, RdA 14 (1990), 6373.Google Scholar
Robertson, M. and Pollitt, J. J., ‘What is Hellenistic about “Hellenistic” Art?’, in Green, P. (ed.), Hellenistic History and Culture (Berkeley, 1993), 67110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Small, A., ‘The Shrine of the Imperial Family in the Macellum at Pompeii’, in Small, A. (ed.), Subject and Ruler: the Cult of the Ruling Power in Classical Antiquity (Ann Arbor, 1996), 115–36.Google Scholar
Small, J. P., ‘Verism and the Vernacular: Late Roman Republican Portraiture and Catullus’, Parola del Passato 37 (1982), 4771.Google Scholar
Smith, R. R. R., ‘Greeks, Foreigners and Roman Republican Portraits’, JRS 71 (1981), 2438.Google Scholar
Smith, R. R. R., Hellenistic Royal Portraits (Oxford, 1988).Google Scholar
Smith, R. R. R., ‘Naked Emperors’, Omnibus 18 (11 1989), 30–2.Google Scholar
Smith, R. R. R., Hellenistic Sculpture (London, 1991).Google Scholar
Stewart, A. F., Attika: Studies in Athenian Sculpture of the Hellenistic Age (London, 1979).Google Scholar
Walker, S., Greek and Roman Portraits (London, 1995).Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A., ‘Civilis Princeps: Between Citizen and King’, JRS 72 (1982), 3248.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A., ‘Rome's Cultural Revolution’, review of Zanker, P., The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus, in JRS 79 (1989), 157–64.Google Scholar
Waywell, G. B., review of Zanker, P., The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus, in CR 41 (1991), 186–9.Google Scholar
Wesch-Klein, G., Funus Publicum (Stuttgart, 1993).Google Scholar
Zanker, P., The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus (Ann Arbor, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar