Article contents
Interest Groups in Parliamentary Decisions in the German Bundestag
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2014
Extract
‘POLICY DETERMINES POLITICS’ IS A FAMILIAR APHORISM AND ITS durability has been tested time and again. Lowi's initial typology showed the normal trinitarian design (distinguishing regulative, distributive and redistributive policy). Later a fourth type was added constituent policy. Lowi's original three elements are, however, not on the same logical level. If we distinguish between the regulative and distributive levels of decision-making we end up with a six-fold typology (Matrix 1).
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 1998
References
1 Lowi, T., ‘American Business, Public Policy, Case Studies, and Political Theory, World Politics, 16 (1964), pp. 677–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2 Schlinder, P. (ed.), Datumhandbuch zur Geschichte des Deutschen Bündestages 1983 bis 1993, Baden‐Baden, Nomos, 1994, p. 846.Google Scholar
3 Jordan, G. and Schubert, K., ‘A Preliminary Ordering of Policy Labels’, European Journal of Political Research (1992) pp. 7–27 Google Scholar; van Waarden, F, ‘Dimensions and types of Policy Networks’, European Journal of Political Research (1992) pp. 29–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 KÖnig, T., Entscheidungen im Politiknetzwerk, Wiesbaden, DKV, 1992, pp. 237 ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Sturm, R., Haushaltspolitik in westlichen Demockratien, Baden‐Baden, Nomos, 1989, p. 326.Google Scholar
6 Stammer, O., et al., Verbdände und Gesetzgebung. Die Einfluβnahme der Verbände auf die Gestaltung des Personalvertretungsgesetzes, Cologne, Westdeutscher Verlag, 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 Fromme, F. K., ‘Wer bestimmt?’, Frankfurter Allgemeine zeitung, 14 02 1996 , p. 1 Google Scholar
8 Wiesenthal, H., Die konzertierte Aktion im Gesundheitswesen, Frankfurt, Campus, 1981.Google Scholar
9 DÖhler, M., Gesundheitspolitik nach der ‘Wende’, Berlin, Sigma, 1990, p. 178.Google Scholar
10 Nullmeier, F. and Rüb, F. W., Die Transformation der Sozialpolitik: vom Sozialstaat zum Sicherungsstaat, Frankfurt, Campus, 1993, p. 222.Google Scholar
11 T. Lowi, op. cit.
12 Pappi, F.‐U, et al., Entscheidungsprozesse in der Arbeits‐und Sozialpolitik, Frankfurt, Campus, 1995, p. 208.Google Scholar
13 Damaschke, K., Der Einfluβ der Verbände auf die Cesetzgebung. Am Beispiel des Gesetzes zum Schutz vor gefährlichen Stoffen (Chemikaliengesetz), Munich, Minerva, 1986, p. 2.Google Scholar
14 Baumgartner, E. and Jones, B., Agendas and Instabilily in American Politics, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1993, p. 179.Google Scholar
15 M. Döhler, op. cit., p. 184.
- 13
- Cited by