Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5c569c448b-ph4cd Total loading time: 0.243 Render date: 2022-07-04T16:32:07.890Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Beyond the Usual Suspects: Non-Left, Male and Non-Feminist MPs and the Substantive Representation of Women

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2013

Abstract

The focus on female MPs and leftist and feminist issues in traditional studies of women's substantive representation has supported the overall conclusion that women, feminists and left-wing parties promote women's interests in parliament. But our analysis of the ‘critical actors’ in women's substantive representation in 10 European countries confirms this finding only to a certain extent. Our inductive research design reveals an important group of less obvious actors: non-left, non-feminist and male MPs. That they speak out on behalf of women points to the necessity of revisiting our theories on women's substantive representation.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2013.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Karen Celis is Research Professor in the Department of Political Science at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel. Contact email: karen.celis@vub.ac.be.

Silvia Erzeel is a Postdoctoral Researcher in the Institut de Sciences Politiques Louvain-Europe at the Université Catholique de Louvain. Contact email: silvia.erzeel@uclouvain.be.

References

Beckwith, K. (2000), ‘Beyond Compare? Women's Movements in Comparative Perspective’, European Journal of Political Research, 37(4): 431468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckwith, K. Cowell-Meyers, K. (2007), ‘Sheer Numbers: Critical Representation Thresholds and Women's Political Representation’, Perspectives on Politics, 5(3): 553565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, K. (2002), ‘The Effect of Legislative Diversity on Agenda Setting: Evidence from Six State Legislatures’, American Politics Research, 30(2): 115142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celis, K. (2006), ‘Substantive Representation of Women and the Impact of Descriptive Representation’, Journal of Women, Politics and Policy, 28(2): 85114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celis, K. (2008), ‘Studying Women's Substantive Representation in Legislatures: When Representative Acts, Contexts and Women's Interests Become Important’, Representation, 44(2): 111123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celis, K. (2013), ‘Representativity in Times of Diversity: The Political Representation of Women’, Women's Studies International Forum, published early online 31 August, doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2013.07.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celis, K. Childs, S. (2012), ‘The Substantive Representation of Women: What to Do with Conservative Claims?’, Political Studies, 60(2): 213225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celis, K. ——Childs, S., Kantola, J. Krook, M.L. (2008), ‘Rethinking Women's Substantive Representation’, Representation, 44(2): 99110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childs, S. (2004), New Labour's Women MPs. Women Representing Women (Oxford: Routledge).Google Scholar
Childs, S. (2006), ‘The Complicated Relationship between Sex, Gender and the Substantive Representation of Women’, European Journal of Women's Studies, 13(1): 721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childs, S. Krook, M.L. (2008), ‘Critical Mass Theory and Women's Political Representation’, Political Studies, 56(3): 725736.Google Scholar
Childs, S. —— (2009), ‘Analysing Women's Substantive Representation: From Critical Mass to Critical Actors’, Government and Opposition, 44(2): 125145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childs, S. Webb, P. (2012), Sex, Gender and the Conservative Party: From Iron Lady to Kitten Heels (Basingstoke: Palgrave).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childs, S. Withey, J. (2004), ‘Women Representatives Acting for Women: Sex and the Signing of Early Day Motions in the 1997 British Parliament’, Political Studies, 52(3): 552564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conover, P.J. Sapiro, V. (1993), ‘Gender, Feminist Consciousness, and War’, American Journal of Political Science, 37(4): 10791099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtin, J. (2008), ‘Women, Political Leadership and Substantive Representation: The Case of New Zealand’, Parliamentary Affairs, 61(3): 490504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillard, A.D. (2005), ‘Adventures in Conservative Feminism’, Society, 42(3): 2527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dovi, S. (2002), ‘Preferable Descriptive Representatives: Will Just Any Woman, Black, or Latino Do?’, American Political Science Review, 96(4): 729743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duverger, M. (1955), The Political Role of Women (Paris: UN Economic and Social Council).Google Scholar
Erzeel, S. (2012), ‘Presence Theory and Beyond’, unpublished PhD thesis, Brussels, Vrije Universiteit Brussel.Google Scholar
Erzeel, S., Caluwaerts, D. Celis, K. (2014), ‘From Agency to Institutions and Back: Comparing Legislators’ Acting on Behalf of Women in Parliamentary Democracies’, in K. Deschouwer and S. Depauw (eds), Representing the People: A Survey among Members of Statewide and Substate Parliaments (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Evans, E. (2011), Gender and Liberal Democrats: Representing Women? (Manchester: Manchester University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grey, S. (2006), ‘Numbers and Beyond: The Relevance of Critical Mass in Gender Research’, Politics and Gender, 2(4): 492502.Google Scholar
Gurin, P. (1985), ‘Women's Gender Consciousness’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 49(2): 143163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanter, R. (1977), ‘Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women’, American Journal of Sociology, 82(5): 965990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kittilson, M. (2006), Challenging Parties, Changing Parliaments (Columbus: Ohio State University Press).Google Scholar
Lovenduski, J. (2005) (ed.), State Feminism and Political Representation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Lovenduski, J. Norris, P. (1993), Gender and Party Politics (London: Sage).Google Scholar
McBride, D. Mazur, A. (2010), The Politics of State Feminism (Philadelphia: Temple University Press).Google Scholar
McBride Stetson, D.E. (ed.) (2001), Abortion Politics, Women's Movements, and the Democratic State (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackay, F. (2006), ‘Descriptive and Substantive Representation in New Parliamentary Spaces: The Case of Scotland’, in M. Sawer, M. Tremblay and L. Trimble (eds), Representing Women in Parliament (London: Routledge): 171187.Google Scholar
Mateo Diaz, M. (2005), Representing Women? Female Legislators in West European Parliaments (Colchester: ECPR Press).Google Scholar
Matland, R. Studlar, D. (1996), ‘The Contagion of Women Candidates in Single Member District and Proportional Representation Electoral Systems: Canada and Norway’, Journal of Politics, 58(3): 707733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Regan, V. (2000), Gender Matters: Female Policymakers’ Influence in Industrialized Nations (London: Praeger).Google Scholar
Opello, K. (2008), ‘Do Women Represent Women in France? The Case of Brittany's Regional Council’, French Politics, 6(4): 321341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, A. (1995), The Politics of Presence (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Pitkin, H. (1972), The Concept of Representation (Berkeley: University College Press).Google Scholar
Reingold, B. (2000), Representing Women: Sex, Gender, and Legislative Behavior in Arizona and California (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press).Google Scholar
Ruiz-Jiminez, A. (2003), Conservative Parties and Feminist Demands Viewed in an International Perspective: Making Sense of the Partido Popular in Spain, working paper (Instituto Juan March de Estudios e Investigaciones, Madrid).Google Scholar
Sawer, M. (1998), ‘Loading the Dice: The Impact of Electoral Systems on Women’, in Women Into Politics (ed.), Here We Come, Ready or Not (North Sydney: Women Into Politics): 4653.Google Scholar
Schreiber, R. (2002), ‘Injecting a Woman's Voice: Conservative Women's Organizations, Gender Consciousness, and the Expression of Women's Policy Preferences’, Sex Roles, 47(7/8): 331342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreiber, R. (2008), Righting Feminism: Conservative Women and American Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squires, J. (2008), ‘The Constitutive Representation of Gender’, Representation, 44(2): 187204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swers, M. (2002), The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Tremblay, M. (1998), ‘Do Female MPs Substantively Represent Women? A Study of Legislative Behaviour in Canada's 35th Parliament’, Canadian Journal of Political Science, 31(3): 435465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, M. (2006), ‘The Substantive Representation of Women and PR: Some Reflections on the Role of Surrogate Representation and Critical Mass’, Politics and Gender, 2(4): 502511.Google Scholar
Tremblay, M. Pelletier, R. (2000), ‘More Feminists or More Women? Descriptive and Substantive Representation of Women in the 1997 Canadian Federal Elections’, International Political Science Review, 21(4): 381405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wangnerud, L. (2000), ‘Testing the Politics of Presence Empirically: Women's Representation in the Swedish Riksdag’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 23(1–2): 6791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weldon, L. (2002), ‘Beyond Bodies: Institutional Sources of Representation for Women’, Journal of Politics, 64(4): 11531174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weldon, L. (2011), ‘Perspectives against Interests: Sketch of a Feminist Political Theory of “Women”’, Politics and Gender, 7(3): 441446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiliarty, S. (2010), The CDU and the Politics of Gender in Germany: Bringing Women to the Party (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, M. (1998), Voice, Trust, and Memory (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Yoder, J. (1991), ‘Rethinking Tokenism: Looking Beyond Numbers’, Gender and Society, 5(2): 178192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, I.M. (2000), Inclusion and Democracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
31
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Beyond the Usual Suspects: Non-Left, Male and Non-Feminist MPs and the Substantive Representation of Women
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Beyond the Usual Suspects: Non-Left, Male and Non-Feminist MPs and the Substantive Representation of Women
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Beyond the Usual Suspects: Non-Left, Male and Non-Feminist MPs and the Substantive Representation of Women
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *