Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T07:00:34.764Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ON LATTICE ISOMORPHISMS OF INVERSE SEMIGROUPS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2004

PETER R. JONES
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science, Marquette University, Milwaukee WI 53233, USA e-mail: jones@mscs.mu.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

An ${\cal L}$-isomorphism between inverse semigroups $S$ and $T$ is an isomorphism between their lattices ${\cal L}(S)$ and ${\cal L}(T)$ of inverse subsemigroups. The author and others have shown that if $S$ is aperiodic – has no nontrivial subgroups – then any such isomorphism $\Phi$ induces a bijection $\phi$ between $S$ and $T$. We first characterize the bijections that arise in this way and go on to prove that under relatively weak ‘archimedean’ hypotheses, if $\phi$ restricts to an isomorphism on the semilattice of idempotents of $S$, then it must be an isomorphism on $S$ itself, thus generating a result of Goberstein. The hypothesis on the restriction to idempotents is satisfied in many applications. We go on to prove theorems similar to the above for the class of completely semisimple inverse semigroups.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2004 Glasgow Mathematical Journal Trust