Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T02:10:54.527Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Notes on Dehousse's Discussion of Method: The Return of the European Federalism/Functionalism Debate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Uwe Säuberlich

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Information
German Law Journal , Volume 2 , Issue 14: Special issue – European Constitutionalism , 2001 , E6
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 by German Law Journal GbR 

References

See, http://www.germanembassy.org.au/eu-fisch.htm.Google Scholar
Delors, Jaques, Critique la stratégie d'élargissement de l'Union, LE MONDE, January 19, 2000, at 2.Google Scholar
For an overview of the chronology of this debate, see, C. Busse, Braucht Europa einen Kern, Das Parlament, B (47) 2000, 3 et seq.Google Scholar
See, http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org./papers/00/00f1101.html.Google Scholar
Weiler, Joseph H. H., THE CONSTITUTION OF EUROPE 330 et. seq. (1999).Google Scholar
On the notion of legitimacy in the EU, see, Gunnar Folke Schuppert, Überlegungen zu demokratischen Legitimation des europäischen Regierungssystems, in FESTSCHRIFT FÜR RAUSCHNING, 201, 207 (2001).Google Scholar
E. g., the BSE-crisis.Google Scholar
Dehousse, Renaud, Regulating by Networks in the European Community: The Role of Agencies, 4 JEPP 246 et seq (1997).Google Scholar
Bogdandy, Armin von, Der Euro zwingt zur politischen Union — und vielleicht einer neuen Gemeinschaft, EuZW 449 (2001); Jean-Marc Sorel, L'Euro vu de l'extérieur: une monnaie entre puissance et incertitudes, 127 JDI 7, 15 et. seq. (2000).Google Scholar