¹ Nicola Lacey, A Life of H.L.A. Hart. The Nightmare and the Noble Dream (2004).Google Scholar

² See, e.g., id. at 129 (Jenifer Hart); 353 (Ronald Dworkin).Google Scholar

³ Id. at 1.Google Scholar

⁴ Id. at 3 (emphasis added).Google Scholar

⁵ Id. at 1.Google Scholar

⁶ See id. at 122.Google Scholar

⁷ See id. at xxii. “Since my ambition was to write a book which could be read as a complete narrative, and following Herbert Hart's own example in The Concept of Law, […].”Google Scholar

⁸ There are now and then a few repetitions, but they are mostly an implication of the literary genre that implies recursive narrative processes.Google Scholar

⁹ Neil MacCormick, HLA Hart (1981).Google Scholar

¹⁰ Lacey, supra note 1, at xxii.Google Scholar

¹¹ Blackburn, Simon and Waldron, Jeremy, “Letter” In Reply to Thomas Nagel's Review of Nicola Lacey's Book, 27 London Review of Books No. 4 (2005), available at http://www.lrb.co.uk/v27/n04/letters.html.Google Scholar

¹² See the exchange between Thomas Nagel, Jeremy Waldron and Simon Blackburn. Letters, 27 London Review of Books No. 4 (2005), available at http://www.lrb.co.uk/v27/n04/letters.html. See also Thomas Nagel, “The Central Questions” – Review of Nicola Lacey's A Life of H.L.A. Hart, 27 London Review of Books No. 3 (2005), available at http://www.lrb.co.uk/v27/n03/nage01_.html.Google Scholar

¹³ See the same exchange between Nagel, Waldron and Blackburn, supra note 12. See also Nagel, supra note 12.Google Scholar

¹⁴ See the Biographer's Note on Approach and Sources at the beginning of the book.Google Scholar

¹⁵ Lacey, supra note 1, at xviii.Google Scholar

¹⁶ See id. at 357.Google Scholar

¹⁷ On these two central questions, see id. at 3. “This contrast between his public and private worlds raises fascinating questions not only about Hart's background and personality but also about the nature of his intellectual creativity and about the quality of the social world, with is various intersecting hierarchies, in which he lived.” (emphasis added).Google Scholar

¹⁸ Id. at xix. See, e.g., Nicola Lacey, Unspeakable Subjects (1998); Nicola Lacey, Feminist Perspectives on Ethical Positivism, in Judicial Power, Democracy and Legal Positivism (T. Campbell and J. Goldsworthy eds. 2000); Nicola Lacey, Philosophical Foundations of the Common Law: Social not Metaphysical, in Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence (J. Horder ed. 2000); Nicola Lacey and E. Jackson, Introducing Feminist Legal Theory, in Jurisprudence and Legal Theory: Commentary and Materials (J. Penner, D. Schiff and R. Nobles eds. 2002); Nicola Lacey, Feminist Legal Theories and the Rights of Women, in Gender and Human Rights (Karen Knopp ed. 2004).Google Scholar

¹⁹ Lacey, supra note 1, at xvii.Google Scholar

²⁰ Id. at xix.Google Scholar

²¹ Id. at xviii-xix.Google Scholar

²² Id. at xix.Google Scholar

²³ Id. at xx.Google Scholar

²⁴ See id. at 3 (“Life and Scholarship”).Google Scholar

²⁵ See, e.g., Lacey, Unspeakable Subjects, supra note 18.Google Scholar

²⁶ Lacey, supra note 1, at xvii.Google Scholar

²⁷ Id. at xvii.Google Scholar

²⁸ Id. at xvii. One exception is on page 352 and even then it is a scientific contribution rather than a personal one.Google Scholar

²⁹ Id. at xviii.Google Scholar

³⁰ Id. at xvii.Google Scholar

³¹ Id. at xviii.Google Scholar

³² See Nagel, supra note 12.Google Scholar

³³ Lacey, supra note 1, at xviii.Google Scholar

³⁴ Id. at xx.Google Scholar

³⁵ See Nagel, supra note 12.Google Scholar

³⁶ Lacey, supra note 1, at xix.Google Scholar

³⁷ Id. at ix. See J. Ryan, “Letter” In Reply to Nagel's Review of Nicola Lacey's Book, 27 London Review of Books No. 4 (2005), available at http://www.lrb.co.uk/v27/n04/letters.html.Google Scholar

³⁸ Lacey, supra note 1, at xix.Google Scholar

³⁹ Id. at xix.Google Scholar

⁴⁰ Id. at xix-xx.Google Scholar

⁴¹ Id. at xix. Contra: id. at xviii (“Voyage of Discovery”).Google Scholar

⁴² Id. at xix.Google Scholar

⁴³ Id. at xxi.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ Id. at 3.Google Scholar

⁴⁵ Id. at 66 (Connecting the mutual attraction of Herbert and Jenifer Hart to their different social origins and their respective longing to belong to the opposite side).Google Scholar

⁴⁶ Interestingly, Lacey uses a “back and forth” narration technique in emphasizing elements in her story that allow her to attract attention on features which will be confirmed later on.Google Scholar

⁴⁷ See Lacey, supra note 1, at xviii. See also id. at 229-232. On this debate, see Hart, H.L.A., American Jurisprudence through English Eyes: The Nightmare and the Noble Dream, 11 Georgia Law Review 969 (1977).Google Scholar

⁴⁸ See, e.g., Lacey, supra note 1, at 61. “There is no evidence that Herbert had any significant sexual relationships during the first half of the decade. This lack of sexual relationships might be explained in terms of the amount of time he was devoting to work, and the emotional reserve which characterized most of his friendships was doubtless to some degree simply a product of the prevailing culture in the 1930s.” (emphasis added).Google Scholar

⁴⁹ Id. at 61.Google Scholar

⁵⁰ Id. at Chapter 4.Google Scholar

⁵¹ Id. at 73-74.Google Scholar

⁵² Id. at 203-208.Google Scholar

⁵³ See id. at 33-35.Google Scholar

⁵⁴ Id. at 12.Google Scholar

⁵⁵ See id. at 269.Google Scholar

⁵⁶ See id. at 271.Google Scholar

⁵⁷ Id. at 342.Google Scholar

⁵⁸ See id. at 119.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ Id. at 356.Google Scholar

⁶⁰ See id. at 51-57.Google Scholar

⁶¹ See, e.g., id. at 112 ff.Google Scholar

⁶² Id. at 52.Google Scholar

⁶³ Id. at 151.Google Scholar

⁶⁴ Id. at 53.Google Scholar

⁶⁵ Id. at 233.Google Scholar

⁶⁶ Id. at 129.Google Scholar

⁶⁷ Id. at 131.Google Scholar

⁶⁸ Id. at 363.Google Scholar

⁶⁹ Id. at 353.Google Scholar

⁷⁰ Id. at 208.Google Scholar

⁷¹ Id. at 357.Google Scholar