Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T03:18:37.718Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Terrestrial kaolin deposits trapped in Miocene karstic sinkholes on planation surface remnants, Transdanubian Range, Pannonian Basin (Hungary)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 June 2020

Péter Kelemen*
Affiliation:
Department of Petrology and Geochemistry, Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány Péter sétány 1/C, 1117, Budapest, Hungary
Gábor Csillag
Affiliation:
Research Centre for Astronomy and Earth Sciences, Institute for Geological and Geochemical Research, Budaörsi út 45, 1112, Budapest, Hungary Geological, Geophysical and Space Science Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences (MTA) and Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány Péter sétány 1/C, 1117, Budapest, Hungary
István Dunkl
Affiliation:
Geoscience Center, University of Göttingen, Goldschmidtstrasse 3, 37077, Göttingen, Germany
Andrea Mindszenty
Affiliation:
Department of Physical and Applied Geology, Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány Péter sétány 1/C, 1117, Budapest, Hungary
Ivett Kovács
Affiliation:
Research Centre for Astronomy and Earth Sciences, Institute for Geological and Geochemical Research, Budaörsi út 45, 1112, Budapest, Hungary
Hilmar von Eynatten
Affiliation:
Geoscience Center, University of Göttingen, Goldschmidtstrasse 3, 37077, Göttingen, Germany
Sándor Józsa
Affiliation:
Department of Petrology and Geochemistry, Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány Péter sétány 1/C, 1117, Budapest, Hungary
*
Author for correspondence: Péter Kelemen: Email: kelemenpeter1991@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the Transdanubian Range, Pannonian Basin, Hungary, karstic sinkholes on a planation surface of Triassic carbonates are filled by grey clayey–silty kaolin deposits. The provenance and accumulation age of these strongly altered terrestrial karst-filling sediments are constrained by X-ray powder diffraction, heavy mineral analysis and zircon U–Pb dating. The heavy minerals of the Southern Bakony Mountains samples are dominated by the ultra-stable zircon–rutile–tourmaline association. Zircon U–Pb data indicate accumulation between 20 and 16 Ma. Furthermore, Archaean to Palaeogene grains were also determined, reflecting the principally fluvial recycling of Eocene bauxites and their cover sequences. In contrast, the sample from the Keszthely Hills consists almost exclusively of airborne material including zircons of 18–14 Ma, reflecting a dominant contribution from the Carpathian–Pannonian Neogene volcanism. The shift in the Miocene age components is inferred to have been caused by the landscape evolution and burial history of the planation surface remnants controlled by local block tectonics.

Type
Original Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

1. Introduction

In the Keszthely Hills (KH) and the Southern Bakony Mountains (SBM), kaolin deposits fill ~100 m deep karstic sinkholes of a planation surface formed on Upper Triassic carbonate rocks. The study area is part of the Transdanubian Range (TR) that belongs to the Alpine–Carpathian–Pannonian (ALCAPA) composite terrain (Fig. 1; Balázs et al. Reference Balázs, Matenco, Magyar, Horváth and Cloetingh2016 and references therein). Several erosional events since the Albian resulted in large stratigraphic gaps in the carbonate-dominated Triassic to Miocene sequences and led to the formation of now fossilized palaeosinkholes and dolinas in the Upper Triassic carbonates (Csillag & Sebe, Reference Csillag, Sebe and Lóczy2015). The karstic depressions trapped strongly altered weathering products, such as kaolin, red clay and/or bauxite deposits, from the contemporaneously exposed basement and siliciclastic assemblages (Budai et al. Reference Budai, Császár, Csillag, Dudko, Koloszár, Majoros and Budai1999; Mindszenty et al. Reference Mindszenty, Csoma, Török, Hips and Hertelendi2000).

Fig. 1. The position of the study area within the Transdanubian Range in the western part of the Pannonian Basin System. Modified after Molnár et al. (Reference Molnár, Lukács, Dunkl, Schmitt, Kiss, Seghedi, Szepesi and Harangi2019). The black bracket indicates the study area.

The studied Cserszegtomaj Kaolin Formation (Bohn, Reference Bohn1979; Budai et al. Reference Budai, Császár, Csillag, Dudko, Koloszár, Majoros and Budai1999) is a yellow, grey terrestrial pelite filling some of the sinkholes in the KH and SBM (Fig. 2). The earliest reports considered this up to 100 m thick formation as a heteropic facies of the Eocene bauxites (Szentes, Reference Szentes1957; Csillag, Reference Csillag1959; Bárdossy, Reference Bárdossy1961), but later studies suggested a Miocene age based on a reworked Middle Eocene to Late Oligocene nannoplankton assemblage (Bohn, Reference Bohn1979).

Fig. 2. Simplified geological map of the study area and the locations of the Uzst-2 and Kht-4 boreholes in the Southern Bakony Mountains and Keszthely Hills (map base after Gyalog, Reference Gyalog2005).

This study provides an up-to-date description of the composition, provenance and age of the Cserszegtomaj Kaolin Formation using X-ray diffraction (XRD), heavy mineral analysis and zircon U–Pb geochronology. The results obtained from this highly altered terrestrial sediment trapped and preserved in sinkholes also proved to be useful in understanding the evolution of carbonate etchplain surfaces (cf. Thomas, Reference Thomas2016) in time and space characterized by intense erosion.

2. Geological setting

The TR is characterized by up to 3 km thick Triassic to Cretaceous marine sediments covering Variscan low-grade metamorphic rocks and Permian siliciclastics (Fig. 2; Haas, Reference Haas2013). The sedimentation of Mesozoic sequences has been controlled and interrupted by multiphase events of Cretaceous Eo-Alpine tectonics. The uplifted, subaerially exposed strata suffered erosion and karstification accompanied by the formation of Albian and Santonian bauxite deposits and their siliciclastic cover sequences (Mindszenty et al. Reference Mindszenty, Csoma, Török, Hips and Hertelendi2000). This terrestrial sedimentation was followed by marine sequences until an uplift event at the end of the Late Cretaceous, causing long-lasting denudation, karstification and etchplanation under tropical climatic conditions which lasted until the Middle Eocene. This subaerial exposure led finally to the formation of the Eocene bauxite (Csillag & Sebe, Reference Csillag, Sebe and Lóczy2015), which trapped airborne volcanic ash from the Periadriatic igneous activity (Dunkl, Reference Dunkl1992). Middle Eocene to Early Oligocene times were characterized by the development of the Slovenian–Hungarian Palaeogene Basin (Báldi, Reference Báldi1984; Fodor et al. Reference Fodor, Jelen, Márton, Skaberne, Čar and Vrabec1998). Between the Oligocene and Middle Miocene, the TR became detached from the Alpine realm by strike-slip faults and reached its present position (Balázs et al. Reference Balázs, Matenco, Magyar, Horváth and Cloetingh2016 and references therein). The large-scale horizontal movement and rotation triggered inversion of the Palaeogene basin, and generated erosion but also an accumulation of up to 800 m thick Oligocene to Lower Miocene, Alpine-derived molasse-type siliciclastic sediments that covered much of the Bakony Mountains (Korpás, Reference Korpás1981; Benedek et al. Reference Benedek, Nagy, Dunkl, Szabó and Józsa2001). By the end of this deposition event, the Upper Triassic carbonates became generally exposed in the TR. Most of the younger Mesozoic and early Palaeogene strata have been removed in the KH, while in the SBM their remnants are preserved until present times (Bohn, Reference Bohn1979; Budai et al. Reference Budai, Császár, Csillag, Dudko, Koloszár, Majoros and Budai1999). Karstification caused etchplanation on the Late Triassic carbonate plateaus while along major faults deep sinkholes developed and filled up with kaolin deposits with reworked Middle Eocene to Late Oligocene nannoplankton implying their Miocene age (Bohn, Reference Bohn1979). These sinkholes, despite being partly eroded, can reach ~50 m depth in the KH area and ~100 m in the SBM (Bohn, Reference Bohn1979).

Between 21 and 10 Ma, a massive ash-veneer produced by the Carpathian–Pannonian volcanism spread over the Eastern Alps, the northwestern Dinarides and the northeastern Southern Alps (e.g. Lukács et al. Reference Lukács, Harangi, Bachmann, Guillong, Danišík, Buret, von Quadt, Dunkl, Fodor, Sliwinski, Soós and Szepesi2015, Reference Lukács, Harangi, Guillong, Bachmann, Fodor, Buret, Dunkl, Sliwinski, von Quadt, Peytcheva and Zimmerer2018; Rocholl et al. Reference Rocholl, Schaltegger, Gilg, Wijbrans and Böhme2018). Thus, the TR became episodically covered with volcanic ash (e.g. Püspöki et al. Reference Püspöki, Kozák, Kovács-Pálffy, Földvári, McIntosh and Vincze2005). From Langhian to Serravallian times (16.5–11.5 Ma), the TR was dissected and the newly formed molasse-type basins became filled up with limestone in the KH area. In the SBM area, the basin filled sequentially with siliciclastic conglomerate, sandstone and limestone (Budai et al. Reference Budai, Császár, Csillag, Dudko, Koloszár, Majoros and Budai1999). Some of the eroded Cretaceous and Eocene bauxite deposits were resedimented as red clays (Tóth & Varga, Reference Tóth and Varga2014; Kelemen et al. Reference Kelemen, Dunkl, Csillag, Mindszenty, von Eynatten and Józsa2017). There is an ongoing debate as to whether the Middle Miocene Climatic Optimum (17–15 Ma; Zachos et al. Reference Zachos, Pagani, Sloan, Thomas and Billups2001) could have caused authigenic kaolinite formation in the red clays and in the kaolin deposits or if their kaolinite content was inherited from Cretaceous–Palaeogene red clays and bauxites (Schwarz, Reference Schwarz1997; Kelemen et al. Reference Kelemen, Dunkl, Csillag, Mindszenty, von Eynatten and Józsa2017).

3. Materials and Methods

Kaolin samples of ~500 g initial mass were collected from the vertical boreholes of Uzst-2 (top: 18–20 m; middle: 58–60 m; base: 106–107 m) and Kht-4 (4.7 m; Fig. 2). XRD analyses were carried out at the Institute for Geological and Geochemical Research of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences and the Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest. Kht-4 is dominated by grey and ochre-coloured clay and the Uzst-2 core divides into an upper, red, silty, and a lower, grey, clayey, pyrite-bearing section (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3. Logs of Uzst-2 and Kht-4 boreholes combined with the results of qualitative X-ray powder diffraction phase analysis. Quartz and kaolinite are generally present at every level of Uzst-2. The iron-bearing phases show significant changes corresponding to the colour change from the red, goethite–hematite-dominated upper section to the grey, pyrite- and jarosite-bearing bottom section. The Kht-4 sample contains exclusively kaolinite. For detailed XRD spectra see Supplementary Figure S1 (available online at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756820000515).

For further analysis, samples were treated with warm-water (~50 °C) ultrasonic agitation and decantation to remove the loose clay matrix. The residual sand fraction yielded 0.002 wt % for the KH sample, ~0.1 wt % for the top/middle and 0.02 wt % for the base of the Uzst-2 core. Approximately 1 mm sized, well-rounded quartz grains are present in all Uzst-2 samples. The 63–125 μm sieve fractions were used for heavy mineral analysis and zircon U–Pb geochronology. Due to the limited amount of available detrital grains, after Na–polytungstate heavy liquid separation, all transparent detrital grains were handpicked and embedded in 1 inch (2.54 cm), polished epoxy mounts. These were used later for both heavy mineral identification and U–Pb zircon dating with the laser ablation–inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometer (LA-ICP-MS) method. Zircon–tourmaline–rutile (ZTR) index values were calculated according to Hubert (Reference Hubert1962). LA-ICP-MS measurements were carried out at the Göchron Laboratories, Geoscience Center, University of Göttingen. Details of this technique are available in Kelemen et al. (Reference Kelemen, Dunkl, Csillag, Mindszenty, von Eynatten and Józsa2017) and references therein.

4. Results

4.a. X-ray diffraction data

The evaluated XRD diagrams are presented in Supplementary Figure S1 (available online at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756820000515). XRD analysis revealed only kaolinite in the Kht-4 sample, while in the Uzst-2 samples quartz and iron-bearing phases were identified along with kaolinite. In the upper, red part the dominant iron-bearing phases are goethite and hematite, while the lower, grey section contains mostly pyrite and some jarosite (Fig. 3).

4.b. Heavy mineral spectra

The ultra-stable minerals (zircon, tourmaline, rutile) dominate the heavy mineral fractions of all samples (Fig. 4). The Kht-4 sample has a ZTR index of ~96 %. Zircon is a major phase (~75 %), while rutile and tourmaline are about ~15 and ~5 %, respectively, and some other phases such as staurolite, amphibole, pyroxene and monazite were detected in trace amounts (<2 %). In borehole Uzst-2, all samples are dominated by a balanced zircon–rutile–tourmaline assemblage (ZTR values ~92–95 %), but minor amounts of kyanite, staurolite, amphibole and pyroxene are also present (<5 %) in the Uzst samples (Fig. 4). The ratio of euhedral zircon crystals to the total number of zircons is between 17 % and 42 %. Detailed heavy mineral data are presented in Supplementary Table S2 (available online at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756820000515).

Fig. 4. Heavy mineral composition of the Kht-4 and Uzst-2 samples. n = number of identified transparent/translucent heavy mineral grains. For details see Supplementary Table S2 (available online at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756820000515).

4.c. Zircon U–Pb ages

The U–Pb raw data are listed in Supplementary Table S3 (available online at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756820000515). In the Kht-4 sample, the majority of the ages are Miocene (89 %), ranging in a tight cluster between 18 and 14 Ma (Fig. 5). Some Permo-Triassic ages are also present (~6 %), along with a very few scattered Proterozoic to Eocene ages. The Uzst-2 samples show a more complex age spectrum. The Miocene ages (10–52 %) are between 20 and 16 Ma, significantly older than that of the Kht-4 sample (18–14 Ma; Fig. 5b). Palaeogene ages range between 44.1 and 29.3 Ma and form a significant group in two of the samples (top: 8 %, middle: 12 %), while all Uzst-2 samples show various ages from Proterozoic to Cretaceous (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5. (a) Cumulative plot of 90–110 % concordant detrital zircon U–Pb ages of the samples from the Kht-4 and Uzst-2 boreholes (Keszthely Hill and Southern Bakony Mountains). The Kht-4 sample has a high proportion of Miocene ages (89 %; 101 out of 113 respectively), while the Uzst-2 samples show much fewer Miocene ages (10–52 %) and contain significant amounts of Precambrian to Eocene ages. (b) The ages younger than 20 Ma are normalized to 100 % and plotted on a cumulative diagram insert. The individual zircon ages of all three Uzst-2 samples are mostly scattered within the 19–16 Ma time intervals, while the Kht-4 sample shows significantly younger ages and the data ranges of the two sampling locations have minor overlap. For more details see Supplementary Table S3 (available online at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756820000515).

5. Discussion

5.a. Provenance of the kaolin deposit in the Southern Bakony Mountains (Uzst-2 borehole)

The well-constrained age components (Supplementary Table S4 available online at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756820000515) identified by the procedures of Dunkl & Székely (Reference Dunkl and Székely2003) and Vermeesch (Reference Vermeesch2012) conform well to some of the major eruption phases of the Carpathian–Pannonian Neogene volcanism (Lukács et al. Reference Lukács, Harangi, Bachmann, Guillong, Danišík, Buret, von Quadt, Dunkl, Fodor, Sliwinski, Soós and Szepesi2015; Rocholl et al. Reference Rocholl, Schaltegger, Gilg, Wijbrans and Böhme2018). Thus, we propose that the eruptions at c. 17.8 ± 0.1 to 16.7 ± 0.2 Ma delivered the majority of Miocene zircons to the Uzst-2 samples (Fig. 6). The similarity in the Th/U ratio of the zircon crystals in the kaolin and in the ashes provides further evidence for the volcanogenic provenance of the youngest zircons (Fig. 7). The trace amounts of amphibole and pyroxene grains most likely had the same source. Two samples contain a significant amount of Eocene zircon crystals (means of the age components: 37.4 ± 0.4 to 36.7 ± 3.3 Ma). The pre-Cenozoic U–Pb age components (Fig. 6; Supplementary Table S4 available online at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756820000515) most likely derived from Proterozoic to Cadomian-, Ordovician- and Variscan igneous formations, as well as Permian and Middle Triassic volcanics of the TR (Fig. 6). These principal age components and the ultra-stable heavy mineral compositions are similar to those recorded in the Miocene red clays of the Bakony Mountains and Balaton Highlands, which are considered to reflect recycled Eocene and Cretaceous bauxite deposits (Kelemen et al. Reference Kelemen, Dunkl, Csillag, Mindszenty, von Eynatten and Józsa2017). This fact indicates that the Uzst-2 sinkhole most likely received recycled sediments from locally exposed Palaeogene sequences most probably by fluvial transportation (Fig. 8).

Fig. 6. Kernel density estimation (KDE) of zircon U–Pb age component analysis of the Uzst-2 and Kht-4 samples in the 1000–0 Ma time interval. See the mean values of the individual age components of the samples in Supplementary Table S4 (available online at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756820000515). Details of the KDE method are explained in Vermeesch (Reference Vermeesch2012). The most significant age components in all samples are related to the Carpathian–Pannonian Neogene volcanism. Easily detectable amounts of Palaeogene zircons are present in the top and middle samples of the Uzst-2 core. The Uzst-2 samples contain a significant amount of most likely inherited pre-Cenozoic zircons generated by the Late Proterozoic to Cadomian-, Ordovician- and Variscan igneous events, as well as Permian and ‘Pietra Verde’ volcanism.

Fig. 7. Zircon U–Pb ages vs Th/U ratios from Kht-4 and Uzst-2 samples compared to Bükk Volcanic Field data (Lukács et al. Reference Lukács, Harangi, Guillong, Bachmann, Fodor, Buret, Dunkl, Sliwinski, von Quadt, Peytcheva and Zimmerer2018).

Fig. 8. Formation model of the kaolin deposits in four steps. (a) During Burdigalian times the Keszthely Hills and Southern Bakony Mountains formed a continuous, eroding etchplain. The Uzst-2 sinkhole accumulated sediments from the Eocene bauxites and their cover sequences as local sources, and from the Carpathian Neogene volcanism as a distant source. (b) During Late Burdigalian times the area is dissected by normal faults. The KH sinkholes started to develop and accumulate materials from the airborne volcanic ash of the Carpathian–Pannonian Neogene volcanism and windblown dust derived from the exposed Slovenian–Hungarian Palaeogene Basin. (c) During Langhian times, the Uzst-2 sinkhole was filled up and/or partly covered. (d) Idealized cross-section of the present geological situation of the study area, which served as a starting point for the reconstruction of the Burdigalian and Langhian models. Base maps: Budai et al. (Reference Budai, Császár, Csillag, Dudko, Koloszár, Majoros and Budai1999) and Gyalog (Reference Gyalog2005). Borehole data are acquired from the Hungarian Geological Reference Library. Sampling points are indicated by black dots. Boreholes, used to construct the profile, are located within a 4 km distance. Map view of the profiles is indicated in Figure 2.

5.b. Provenance of the kaolin deposit in the Keszthely Hills (Kht-4 borehole)

The extremely low sand content, zircon-dominated heavy mineral spectrum and predominant Miocene U–Pb ages suggest that the sediment in the Kht-4 sinkhole is mostly airborne in origin and altered in situ. This implies that the filling is mainly of tephra originating from the Carpathian–Pannonian Neogene volcanics, which provided the majority of zircons and some amphibole and pyroxene crystals. An additional admixture must have been windblown dust derived from the exposed Slovenian–Hungarian Palaeogene Basin which supplied nannoplankton, rutile, tourmaline, staurolite and monazite. The single Palaeogene zircon crystal has only limited significance as a provenance indicator. The Triassic zircons most likely derived from the “pietra verde” tuff intercalations of the Triassic sequence of the TR (Dunkl et al. Reference Dunkl, Farics, Józsa, Lukács, Haas and Budai2019).

5.c. Development and timing of the sinkholes

The development of the c. 50 and 100 m deep kaolin-bearing sinkholes in KH and SBM along with appropriate, tectonically controlled fracturing requires warm-humid climate conditions and an elevated topographic position above the karst water table (e.g. D’Argenio & Mindszenty, Reference D’Argenio and Mindszenty1995). The continuous age distribution between 20 and 16 Ma in the Uzst-2 samples (Fig. 5b) implies that the source materials of the red clay and kaolin assemblages in this area were deposited during and prior to the Miocene Climatic Optimum (17–15 Ma; Zachos et al. Reference Zachos, Pagani, Sloan, Thomas and Billups2001). The dominance of Miocene ages and the almost total absence of Palaeogene ages in the Kht-4 sinkhole suggest that kaolin deposits in the KH area accumulated soon after the formation of their hosting sinkholes, or both the sinkhole formation and filling events occurred contemporaneously, in agreement with Csillag & Sebe (Reference Csillag, Sebe and Lóczy2015). The shift between the Miocene ages of the SBM and KH samples suggests that by c. 16 Ma the Uzst-2 sinkhole had already been filled, thus could not accommodate more airborne material, and became covered by Middle Miocene sediments deposited after a horst- and graben-forming tectonic event (Csillag & Nádor, Reference Csillag and Nádor1997; Fig. 8b, c). Meanwhile the Kht-4 sinkhole was still exposed and accumulated material until 15–14 Ma. The in situ transformation into kaolin likely occurred during the Middle Miocene Climatic Optimum (Zachos et al. Reference Zachos, Pagani, Sloan, Thomas and Billups2001) under at least subtropical warm and humid climatic conditions dominating the Pannonian Basin during this time interval (Jiménez-Moreno, Reference Jiménez-Moreno2007).

Bauxites and bauxitic to kaolinitic red clays were reported from the Early to the Middle Miocene, from several localities in the wider surroundings of the Pannonian Basin and across Europe. Wagreich et al. (Reference Wagreich, Zetter, Bryda and Peresson1997) mentioned gibbsitic karst bauxites from the Hieflau area in the Northern Calcareous Alps. Further north, a 50 m thick bauxitic laterite profile was described on the Miocene Vogelsberg continental basalt lavas palaeolattitude 45 by Schwarz (Reference Schwarz1997). Subaerial exposure in the Apennines and Dinarides also resulted in bauxitic (ferrallitic) weathering products probably related to the Middle Miocene Climatic Optimum (Kici et al., Reference Kici, Peza, Skhupi and Xhomo1991; Simone et al., Reference Simone, Carannante, D’Argenio, Ruberti and Mindszenty1991; Šinkoveć & Šakać, Reference Šinkoveć and Šakać1991).

6. Conclusions

The XRD, heavy mineral and U–Pb age data reveal major differences of the Keszthely Hills and Southern Bakony Mountains regarding the source of their kaolin deposits, mainly because they developed during different time intervals (Fig. 8a–d).

The major sources of the Uzst-2 sinkhole (Southern Bakony Mountains) are fluvially resedimented local Eocene bauxites with their Palaeogene cover sequences and airborne ash from the distal Carpathian–Pannonian Neogene volcanism. The strongly altered parent materials were transported into a pre-existing, deep sinkhole between 20 and 16 Ma.

The Kht-4 sinkhole (Keszthely Hills) hosts a different assemblage of airborne origin. The most important source is from the Carpathian–Pannonian Neogene volcanism. The airborne volcanic ash trapped in newly formed sinkholes and underwent in situ weathering during the Middle Miocene Climatic Optimum. The presence of Palaeogene nannoplankton assemblages indicates that this site also received redeposited material from the inverted Slovenian–Hungarian Palaeogene Basin.

Formation processes were controlled by the tectonic evolution of the surrounding landscape. Uplift between 18 and 14 Ma triggered karstification and formation of kaolin deposit in the Kht-4 sinkhole under the warm and humid conditions of the Miocene Climatic Optimum. This study confirms that heavy mineral studies combined with single-crystal dating of detrital grains may be particularly useful to reconstruct stages of landform evolution and denudational history of tectonically affected planation surfaces.

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (ID: K106197), the ERASMUS+ Internship program (contract number: 18/1/KA103/047073/SMP) and Papp Simon Foundations. The authors are grateful to Andreas Kronz, Judit Nagy, Irina Ottenbacher, Cornelia Friedrich, László Szikszay and Zoltán Lantos for help with analytical and documentation procedures. Special thanks to László Fodor, Réka Lukács and Szabolcs Harangi for helpful discussions.

Supplementary material

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756820000515

References

Balázs, A, Matenco, L, Magyar, I, Horváth, F and Cloetingh, SAPL (2016) The link between tectonics and sedimentation in back‐arc basins: new genetic constraints from the analysis of the Pannonian Basin. Tectonics 35, 1526–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Báldi, T (1984) The terminal Eocene and Early Oligocene events in Hungary and the separation of an anoxic, cold Paratethys. Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae 77, 127.Google Scholar
Bárdossy, G (1961) Adatok a cserszegtomaji kaolinites tűzállóagyag-telepek ismeretéhez [Data interpretation of the Cserszegtomaj Kaolin deposits]. A Magyar Állami Földtani Intézet évkönyve [Annals of the Hungarian Geological Institute] 49, 82545 (in Hungarian).Google Scholar
Benedek, K, Nagy, Z, Dunkl, I, Szabó, C and Józsa, S (2001) Petrographical, geochemical and geochronological constraints on igneous clasts and sediments hosted in the Oligo-Miocene Bakony Molasse, Hungary: evidence for a Paleo-Drava River system. International Journal of Earth Sciences (Geologische Rundschau) 90, 519–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benedek, K, Pécskay, Z, Szabó, C, Jósvai, J and Németh, T (2004) Paleogene igneous rocks in the Zala Basin (Western Hungary): link to the Paleogene magmatic activity along the Periadriatic Lineament. Geologica Carpathica 55, 4350.Google Scholar
Bergomi, MA, Zanchetta, S and Tunesi, A (2015) The tertiary dike magmatism in the Southern Alps: geochronological data and geodynamic significance. International Journal of Earth Sciences (Geologische Rundschau) 104, 449–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohn, P (1979) A Keszthelyi-hegység regionális földtana [Geology of the Keszthely Hills]. Geologica Hungarica, Series Geologica 19, 102 (in Hungarian).Google Scholar
Budai, T, Császár, G, Csillag, G, Dudko, A, Koloszár, L, Majoros, G and Budai, T (1999) Magyarázó a Balaton-felvidék földtani térképéhez 1: 50 000. (Explanatory book to the geological map of the Balaton Highlands.) A Magyar Állami Földtani Intézet alkalmi kiadványa [Occasional Papers of the Hungarian Geological Institute]. Budapest: Magyar Állami Földtani Intézet, 257 pp. (in Hungarian).Google Scholar
Csillag, P (1959) A cserszegtomaji tűzállóagyag és festékföld [Description of the fireclay at Cserszegtomaj location]. In A Magyar Állami Földtani Intézet évi jelentése 1955-ről [Annual Report of the Hungarian Geological Institute]. Budapest: Magyar Állami Földtani Intézet, pp. 29–36 (in Hungarian).Google Scholar
Csillag, G and Nádor, A (1997) Multi-phase geomorphological evolution of the Keszthely Mountains (SW-Transdanubia) and karstic recharge of the Hévíz lake. Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie Supplementband 110, 1526.Google Scholar
Csillag, G and Sebe, K (2015) Long-term geomorphological evolution. In Landscapes and Landforms of Hungary (ed Lóczy, D.), pp. 438. Berlin/New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Danišík, M, Fodor, L, Dunkl, I, Gerdes, A, Csizmeg, J, Hámor-Vidó, M and Evans, NJ (2015) A multi-system geochronology in the Ad-3 borehole, Pannonian Basin (Hungary) with implications for dating volcanic rocks by low-temperature thermochronology and for interpretation of (U–Th)/He data. Terra Nova 27, 258–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Argenio, B and Mindszenty, A (1995) Bauxites and related paleokarst: tectonic and climatic event markers at regional unconformities. Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae 88, 453500.Google Scholar
Dunkl, I (1992) Origin of Eocene-covered karst bauxites of the Transdanubian Central Range (Hungary): evidence for early Eocene volcanism. European Journal of Mineralogy 4, 581–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunkl, I and Székely, B (2003) Component analysis with visualization of fitting-Popshare, a freeware program for evaluation of mixed geochronological data. In EGS-AGU-EUG Joint Assembly.Google Scholar
Dunkl, I, Farics, É, Józsa, S, Lukács, R, Haas, J and Budai, T (2019) Traces of Carnian volcanic activity in the Transdanubian Range, Hungary. International Journal of Earth Sciences 108, 1451–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, L, Jelen, B, Márton, E, Skaberne, D, Čar, J and Vrabec, M (1998) Miocene-Pliocene tectonic evolution of the Slovenian Periadriatic fault: Implications for Alpine-Carpathian extrusion models. Tectonics 17, 690–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerdes, A, Friedl, G, Parrish, RR and Finger, F (2003) High-resolution geochronology of Variscan granite emplacement: the South Bohemian Batholith. Journal of the Czech Geological Society 48, 53–4.Google Scholar
Guillot, F, Schaltegger, U, Bertrand, J, Deloule, É and Baudin, T (2002) Zircon U–Pb geochronology of Ordovician magmatism in the polycyclic Ruitor massif (Internal W Alps). International Journal of Earth Sciences 91, 964–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gyalog, J (2005) Magyarázó Magyarország fedett földtani térképéhez (az egységek rövid leírása) – 1:100 000. (Explanatory notes to the geological map of Hungary.) , Budapest: Magyar Állami Földtani Intézet, 189 pp. (in Hungarian).Google Scholar
Haas, J (2013) Geology of Hungary. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 244 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horváth, E and Tari, G (1987) Middle Triassic volcanism in the Buda Mountains. Annales Universitatis Scientiarium Budapestiensis. Sectio Geologica 27, 316.Google Scholar
Hubert, JF (1962) A zircon-tourmaline-rutile maturity index and the independence of the composition of heavy mineral assemblages with the gross composition and texture of sandstones. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 32, 440–50.Google Scholar
Jiménez-Moreno, G (2007) Middle Miocene latitudinal climatic gradient in western Europe: evidence from pollen records. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 253, 208–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelemen, P, Dunkl, I, Csillag, G, Mindszenty, A, von Eynatten, H and Józsa, S (2017) Tracing multiple resedimentation on an isolated karstified plateau: the bauxite-bearing Miocene red clay of the Southern Bakony Mountains, Hungary. Sedimentary Geology 358, 8496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kici, V, Peza, L, Skhupi, D and Xhomo, A (1991) Bauxites in Albania. Acta Geologica Hungarica 34, 335–44.Google Scholar
Korpás, L (1981) A Dunántúli-középhegység oligocén-alsó miocén képződményei [Monography of the Oligocene and Lower Miocene Formations in the Transdanubian Range]. A Magyar Állami Földtani Intézet évkönyve [Annals of the Hungarian Geological Institute] 64. Budapest: Magyar Állami Földtani Intézet, 140 pp. (in Hungarian).Google Scholar
Košler, J, Konopásek, J, Sláma, J and Vrána, S (2014) U–Pb zircon provenance of Moldanubian metasediments in the Bohemian Massif. Journal of the Geological Society 171, 8395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lelkes-Felvári, G and Klötzli, U (2005) Zircon geochronology of the “Kékkút quartz porphyry”, Balaton Highland, Transdanubian Central Range, Hungary. Acta Geologica Hungarica 47, 139–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, G, Winkler, W, Rahn, M, von Quadt, A and Willett, SD (2018) Evaluating igneous sources of the Taveyannaz formation in the Central Alps by detrital zircon U–Pb age dating and geochemistry. Swiss Journal of Geosciences 111, 399416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukács, R, Harangi, Sz, Bachmann, O, Guillong, M, Danišík, M, Buret, Y, von Quadt, A, Dunkl, I, Fodor, L, Sliwinski, J, Soós, I and Szepesi, J (2015) Zircon geochronology and geochemistry to constrain the youngest eruption events and magma evolution of the Mid-Miocene ignimbrite flare-up in the Pannonian Basin, eastern central Europe. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 170, 52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukács, R, Harangi, S, Guillong, M, Bachmann, O, Fodor, L, Buret, Y, Dunkl, I, Sliwinski, J, von Quadt, A, Peytcheva, I and Zimmerer, M (2018) Early to Mid-Miocene syn-extensional massive silicic volcanism in the Pannonian Basin (East-Central Europe): eruption chronology, correlation potential and geodynamic implications. Earth-Science Reviews 179, 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mindszenty, A, Csoma, A, Török, Á, Hips, K and Hertelendi, E (2000) Flexura jellegű előtéri deformációhoz köthető karsztbauxitszintek a dunántúli középhegységben [Rudistid limestones, bauxites, paleokarst and geodynamics. The case of the Cretaceous of theTransdanubian Central Range]. Földtani Közlöny [Bulletin of the Hungarian Geological Society] 131, 107–52 [in Hungarian].Google Scholar
Molnár, K, Lukács, R, Dunkl, I, Schmitt, AK, Kiss, B, Seghedi, I, Szepesi, J and Harangi, SZ (2019) Episodes of dormancy and eruption of the Late Pleistocene Ciomadul volcanic complex (Eastern Carpathians, Romania) constrained by zircon geochronology. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 373, 133–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neubauer, F, Klotzli, U and Poscheschnik, P (2001) Cadomian magmatism in the Alps recorded in Late Ordovician sandstones of the Carnic Alps: preliminary results from zircon Pb/Pb evaporation dating. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 81, 175–9.Google Scholar
Neubauer, F, Frisch, W and Hansen, BT (2002) Early Palaeozoic tectonothermal events in basement complexes of the eastern Graywacke Zone (Eastern Alps): evidence from U–Pb zircon data. International Journal of Earth Sciences 91, 775–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pálfy, J, Parrish, RR, David, K and Vörös, A (2003) Mid-Triassic integrated U–Pb geochronology and ammonoid biochronology from the Balaton Highlands (Hungary). Journal of the Geological Society, London 160, 271–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poller, U and Todt, W (2000) U–Pb single zircon data of granitoids from the High Tatra Mountains (Slovakia): implications for the geodynamic evolution. Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 91, 235–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Püspöki, Z, Kozák, M, Kovács-Pálffy, P, Földvári, M, McIntosh, RW and Vincze, L (2005) Eustatic and tectonic/volcanic control in sedimentary bentonite formation—a case study of Miocene bentonite deposits from the Pannonian Basin. Clays and clay minerals 53, 7191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rocholl, A, Schaltegger, U, Gilg, HA, Wijbrans, J and Böhme, M (2018) The age of volcanic tuffs from the Upper Freshwater Molasse (North Alpine Foreland Basin) and their possible use for tephrostratigraphic correlations across Europe for the Middle Miocene. International Journal of Earth Sciences 107, 387407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, T (1997) Lateritic bauxite in central Germany and implications for Miocene palaeoclimate. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 129, 3750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simone, L, Carannante, G, D’Argenio, B, Ruberti, D and Mindszenty, A (1991) Bauxites and related paleokarst in Southern Italy, Sicily and Sardinia. Acta Geologica Hungarica 34, 273305.Google Scholar
Šinkoveć, B and Šakać, K (1991) Bauxite deposits of Yugoslavia: the state of the art. Acta Geologica Hungarica 34, 307–15.Google Scholar
Sliwinski, JT, Guillong, M, Liebske, C, Dunkl, I, von Quadt, A and Bachmann, O (2017) Improved accuracy of LA-ICP-MS U-Pb ages of Cenozoic zircons by alpha dose correction. Chemical Geology 472, 821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szentes, F (1957) Bauxitkutatás a Keszthelyi-hegységben [Bauxite exploration in the Keszthely Mountains]. A Magyar Állami Földtani Intézet évkönyve [Annals of the Hungarian Geological Institute] 46, 531–41 (in Hungarian).Google Scholar
Teipel, U, Eichhorn, R, Loth, G, Rohrmüller, J, Höll, R and Kennedy, A (2004) U-Pb SHRIMP and Nd isotopic data from the western Bohemian Massif (Bayerischer Wald, Germany): implications for upper Vendian and lower Ordovician magmatism. International Journal of Earth Sciences 93, 782801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, DS (2016) The Dictionary of Physical Geography, 4th edn. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 614 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tóth, K and Varga, G (2014) A diszeli bauxit [The Diszel bauxite occurrence]. Földtani Közlöny [Bulletin of the Hungarian Geological Society] 144, 315–28. (in Hungarian).Google Scholar
Uher, P and Ondrejka, M (2009) The Velence granites, Transdanubic Superunit: a product of Permian A-type magmatism and Alpine overprint (results of zircon SHRIMP and monazite EMPA dating). HUNTEK 2009, Proceedings of the 7th Meeting of the Central European Tectonic Studies Group (CETeG) and 14th Meeting of the Czech Tectonic Studies Group (CTS), Abstracts, 32.Google Scholar
Vermeesch, P (2012) On the visualisation of detrital age distributions. Chemical Geology 312, 190–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagreich, M, Zetter, R, Bryda, G and Peresson, H (1997) Das Tertiär von Hieflau (Steiermark): Untermiozäne Sedimentation in den östlichen Kalkalpen. Zentralblatt für Geologie und Paläontologie 1, 633–45.Google Scholar
Zachos, J, Pagani, M, Sloan, L, Thomas, E and Billups, K (2001) Trends, rhythms, and aberrations in global climate 65 Ma to present. Science 292, 686–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1. The position of the study area within the Transdanubian Range in the western part of the Pannonian Basin System. Modified after Molnár et al. (2019). The black bracket indicates the study area.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Simplified geological map of the study area and the locations of the Uzst-2 and Kht-4 boreholes in the Southern Bakony Mountains and Keszthely Hills (map base after Gyalog, 2005).

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Logs of Uzst-2 and Kht-4 boreholes combined with the results of qualitative X-ray powder diffraction phase analysis. Quartz and kaolinite are generally present at every level of Uzst-2. The iron-bearing phases show significant changes corresponding to the colour change from the red, goethite–hematite-dominated upper section to the grey, pyrite- and jarosite-bearing bottom section. The Kht-4 sample contains exclusively kaolinite. For detailed XRD spectra see Supplementary Figure S1 (available online at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756820000515).

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Heavy mineral composition of the Kht-4 and Uzst-2 samples. n = number of identified transparent/translucent heavy mineral grains. For details see Supplementary Table S2 (available online at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756820000515).

Figure 4

Fig. 5. (a) Cumulative plot of 90–110 % concordant detrital zircon U–Pb ages of the samples from the Kht-4 and Uzst-2 boreholes (Keszthely Hill and Southern Bakony Mountains). The Kht-4 sample has a high proportion of Miocene ages (89 %; 101 out of 113 respectively), while the Uzst-2 samples show much fewer Miocene ages (10–52 %) and contain significant amounts of Precambrian to Eocene ages. (b) The ages younger than 20 Ma are normalized to 100 % and plotted on a cumulative diagram insert. The individual zircon ages of all three Uzst-2 samples are mostly scattered within the 19–16 Ma time intervals, while the Kht-4 sample shows significantly younger ages and the data ranges of the two sampling locations have minor overlap. For more details see Supplementary Table S3 (available online at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756820000515).

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Kernel density estimation (KDE) of zircon U–Pb age component analysis of the Uzst-2 and Kht-4 samples in the 1000–0 Ma time interval. See the mean values of the individual age components of the samples in Supplementary Table S4 (available online at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756820000515). Details of the KDE method are explained in Vermeesch (2012). The most significant age components in all samples are related to the Carpathian–Pannonian Neogene volcanism. Easily detectable amounts of Palaeogene zircons are present in the top and middle samples of the Uzst-2 core. The Uzst-2 samples contain a significant amount of most likely inherited pre-Cenozoic zircons generated by the Late Proterozoic to Cadomian-, Ordovician- and Variscan igneous events, as well as Permian and ‘Pietra Verde’ volcanism.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Zircon U–Pb ages vs Th/U ratios from Kht-4 and Uzst-2 samples compared to Bükk Volcanic Field data (Lukács et al. 2018).

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Formation model of the kaolin deposits in four steps. (a) During Burdigalian times the Keszthely Hills and Southern Bakony Mountains formed a continuous, eroding etchplain. The Uzst-2 sinkhole accumulated sediments from the Eocene bauxites and their cover sequences as local sources, and from the Carpathian Neogene volcanism as a distant source. (b) During Late Burdigalian times the area is dissected by normal faults. The KH sinkholes started to develop and accumulate materials from the airborne volcanic ash of the Carpathian–Pannonian Neogene volcanism and windblown dust derived from the exposed Slovenian–Hungarian Palaeogene Basin. (c) During Langhian times, the Uzst-2 sinkhole was filled up and/or partly covered. (d) Idealized cross-section of the present geological situation of the study area, which served as a starting point for the reconstruction of the Burdigalian and Langhian models. Base maps: Budai et al. (1999) and Gyalog (2005). Borehole data are acquired from the Hungarian Geological Reference Library. Sampling points are indicated by black dots. Boreholes, used to construct the profile, are located within a 4 km distance. Map view of the profiles is indicated in Figure 2.

Supplementary material: Image

Kelemen et al. supplementary material

Kelemen et al. supplementary material 1

Download Kelemen et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 39.4 MB
Supplementary material: File

Kelemen et al. supplementary material

Kelemen et al. supplementary material 2

Download Kelemen et al. supplementary material(File)
File 246.3 KB
Supplementary material: File

Kelemen et al. supplementary material

Kelemen et al. supplementary material 3

Download Kelemen et al. supplementary material(File)
File 31.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Kelemen et al. supplementary material

Kelemen et al. supplementary material 4

Download Kelemen et al. supplementary material(File)
File 12 KB