Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T13:40:14.143Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quaternary tectonics at the eastern border of the Bohemian Massif: new outcrop evidence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Jaromir Leichmann  and
Ewald Hejl
Jaromir Leichmann
Affiliation:
Institut für Geologie und Paläontologie der Univ. Salzburg, Hellbrunnerstraße 34/111, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria
Ewald Hejl
Affiliation:
Institut für Geologie und Paläontologie der Univ. Salzburg, Hellbrunnerstraße 34/111, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recently, an outcrop with clear evidence for Quaternary faulting has been discovered in the eastern part of Bohemian Massif, 25 km southwest of Brno (Moravia, Czech Republic). Basement serpentinite, fluvial gravels, loess and young scree are affected by a steep NNW–SSE trending fault. The geological situation of the outcrop is described for the first time in this article.

Type
Rapid Communications
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 133 , Issue 1 , January 1996 , pp. 103 - 105
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

van Breemen, O., Aftalion, M., Bowes, D. R., Dudek, A., Mísař, Z., Povondra, P., & Vrána, S., 1982. Geochronological studies of the Bohemian Massif, Czechoslovakia, and their significance in the evolution of Central Europe. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences 73, 89–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dallmeyer, R. D., Fritz, H., Neubauer, F., & Urban, M., 1994. Tectonic evolution of the southeastern Bohemian Massif: evidence from new 40Ar/39Ar mineral ages. Mitteilungen der Österreichischen Mineralogischen Gesellschaft 139, 35–7.Google Scholar
Figdor, H., & Scheidegger, A., 1977. Geophysikalische Untersuchungen an der Diendorfer Störung. Verhandlungen der Geologischen Bundesanstalt, Wien 1977, 243–77.Google Scholar
Jaroš, J., & Mísař, Z., 1976. Nomenclature of the tectonic and lithostratigraphic units in the Moravian Svratka Dome. Vestník Ústredního ústavu geologického 51, 113–22.Google Scholar
Jelínek, E., & Dudek, A., 1993. Geochemistry of subsurface Precambrian plutonic rocks from the Brunovistulian Complex in the Bohemian Massif, Czechoslovakia. Precambrian Research 62, 103–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheidegger, A., 1976. Untersuchungen des Beanspruchungsplanes im Einfiußgebiet der Diendorfer Störung. Jahrbuch der Geologischen Bundesanstalt, Wien 119, 83–95.Google Scholar
Schermann, O., 1966. Über Horizontalverschiebungen am Ostrand der Böhmischen Masse. Mitteilungen der Gesellschaft der Geologie- und Bergbaustudenten 16, 89–103.Google Scholar
Smejkal, V., 1964. Absolutní stáří některých vyvřelých a meta-morfovaných hornin stanovené Kalium-Argonovou metodou (druhá část). Vestník Ústredního ústavu geologického 35, 441–9.Google Scholar
Tollmann, A., 1985. Geologie von Österreich. Band II. XV + 710 pp. Wien: Deuticke.Google Scholar