Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T03:18:53.183Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The proposed Cambrian–Ordovician global Boundary stratotype and point (GSSP) in Western Newfoundland, Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

C. R. Barnes
C. R. Barnes
Affiliation:
Sedimentary and Marine Geoscience Branch, Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A OE4, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sections exposing the Cambrian–Ordovician Boundary interval at Broom Point in western Newfoundland have been proposed earlier for a global systemic boundary stratotype. These lie within the Cow Head Group, a late Middle Cambrian to early Middle Ordovician allochthonous unit of limestone, shale, and conglomerate deposited at the toe of the ancient continental slope and on the adjacent continental rise. Several recent studies have further investigated the stratigraphy, sedimentology, and palaeontology of the Cow Head Group and others are under way on magnetostratigraphy and chemostratigraphy. These aspects are reviewed for six key boundary sections representing proximal to distal facies: Cow Head Ledge, Broom Point South, Broom Point North, St Pauls Inlet Quarry, Martin Point, and Green Point. In particular, new data are presented from 260 conodont samples that yielded 15500 conodonts. This intense sampling has allowed the discrimination of minor hiatuses in the proximal to intermediate facies where conglomerates have eroded and cannibalized underlying strata. New conodont data from Broom Point North have lowered the base of the C. lindstromi Zone into unit 74 conglomerates, thereby making this section unsuitable as a boundary stratotype. New collections from Green Point have yielded abundant conodonts and over 9400 conodonts have been recovered from 77 samples.

The conodont, graptolite, and trilobite biostratigraphy through the boundary interval is documented allowing accurate correlation between sections and more precisely revealing small hiatuses in the proximal and intermediate facies. The sequence of conodont zones is: Eoconodontus notchpeakensis, Cordylodus proavus, C. caboti, C. intermedius, C. lindstromi and C. angulatus. These can be correlated with trilobite zones established from both in situ and clast faunas from the proximal to intermediate facies and with graptolite assemblages (of Cooper 1979) especially in the intermediate to distal facies. Three new species of Cordylodus are described (C. andresi, C. hastatus and C. tortus) and the full apparatus of Iapetognathus preaengensis is illustrated.

The criteria for selecting a global boundary stratotype and point (GSSP) are reviewed in terms of the Cow Head sections. The Green Point section is shown to meet, and largely surpass, the prerequisites required of a stratotype. The Green Point section is proposed to be the global boundary stratotype with the base of the Ordovician System defined at the base of unit 23, which is the base of the Broom Point Member, Green Point Formation, at a level coincident with the base of the Cordylodus lindstromi Zone. In addition to an abundant and superbly preserved conodont fauna, this section preserves the best sequence of earliest planktic graptolites through a 40 m interval; the first nematophorous graptolites (of Assemblage 1) occur in unit 25, 6.9 m above the base of the C. lindstromi Zone. This level can be readily correlated into the proximal facies where both deep and shallow water trilobites (in situ and in clasts, respectively) show the base of the C. lindstromi Zone to lie within the Symphysurina brevispicata trilobite Subzone.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 125 , Issue 4 , July 1988 , pp. 381 - 414
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Tai-Xiang, An, 1981. Recent progress in Cambrian and Ordovician conodont biostratigraphy of China. Geological Society of America Special Paper 187, 209–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andres, D. 1981. Beziehungen zwischen kambrischen Conodonten und Euconodonten(vorlaufige Mitteilung). Berliner Geowissenschaftliche Abhandlungen (A) 32, 19–31.Google Scholar
Apollonov, M. K., Chugaeva, M. N. & Dubinina, S. V. 1984. Trilobites and conodonts for the Batyrbay Section (Uppermost Cambrian–Lower Ordovician) in Malyi Karatau Range. (Atlas of the palaeontological plates.) Alma-Ata: Academy of Sciences of the Kazakh S.S.R. NAUKA, Kazakh SSR Publishing House, 47 pp.Google Scholar
Bagnoli, G., Barnes, C. R. & Stevens, R. K. 1987. Tremadocian conodonts from Broom Point and Green Point, western Newfoundland. Bollettino della Societa Paleontologica Italiano.Google Scholar
Baird, D. M. 1960. Observations on the nature and origin of the Cow Head Breccias of Newfoundland. Geological Survey of Canada Paper 60–3, 26 pp.Google Scholar
Barnes, C. R. 1984. Early Ordovician eustatic events in Canada. In Aspects of the Ordovician System (ed. Bruton, D. L.) pp. 51–64. Palaeontological Contributions for the University of Oslo. No. 295. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo.Google Scholar
Barnes, C. R., Kennedy, D. J., McCracken, A. D., Nowlan, G. S. & Tarrant, G. A. 1979. The structure and evolution of Ordovician conodont apparatuses. Lethaia 12, 125–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billings, E. 1865. Paleozoic Fossils. 1. Geological Survey of Canada, 326 pp.Google Scholar
Bruton, D. L., Erdtmann, B.-D. & Koch, L. 1982. The Naersnes section, Oslo Region, Norway: a candidate for the Cambrian–Ordovician boundary stratotype at the base of the Tremadoc Series. In The Cambrian–Ordovician Boundary: Sections, Fossil Distributions and Correlations (ed. Bassett, M. G. Dean, W. T.), pp. 61–70. National Museum of Wales, Geological Series No. 3, Cardiff.Google Scholar
Jun-yuan, Chen & We-li, Gong, 1986. Conodonts. In Aspects of Cambrian–Ordovician Boundary in Dayangcha, China (ed. Jun-yuan, Chen), pp. 93–223. Contribution to Dayangcha International Conference on Cambrian–Ordovician Boundary, Beijing: China Prospect Publishing House.Google Scholar
Jun-yuan, Chen & II Authors, . 1986. Aspects of Cambrian–Ordovician Boundary in Dayangcha, China. pp. 1–140, pls. 1–98. Beijing: China Prospect Publishing House.Google Scholar
Chugaeva, M. N. & Apollonov, M. K. 1982. The Cambrian–Ordovician boundary in the Batyrbaisai section, Malyi Karatau Range, Kazakhstan, U.S.S.R. In The Cambrian–Ordovician Boundary: Sections, Fossil Distributions, and Correlations (eds Bassett, M. G. Dean, W. T.), pp. 76–85. Cardiff: National Museum of Wales, Geological Series No. 3.Google Scholar
Cooper, R. A. 1979. Sequence and correlation of Tremadoc graptolite assemblages. Alcheringa 3, 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowie, J. A., Ziegler, W., Boucot, A. J., Bassett, M. G. & Remane, J. 1986. Guidelines and Statutes of the International Commission on Stratigraphy (ICS). Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 83, 1–14.Google Scholar
Druce, E. C. & Jones, P. J. 1971. Cambro-Ordovician conodonts for the Burke River Structural Belt, Queensland. Bureau of Mineral Resources of Australia, Bulletin 110, 159 pp.Google Scholar
Erdtmann, B.-D. 1986. Review of lithofacies and graptolite-based biofacies of three critical Cambrian–Ordovician boundary stratotype sections. In Aspects of Cambrian–Ordovician Boundary in Dayangcha, China (ed. Jun-yuan, Chen), pp. 374–97. Beijing: China Prospect Publishing House.Google Scholar
Ethington, R. L. & Clark, D. L. 1971. Lower Ordovician conodonts of North America. In Symposium on Conodont Biostratigraphy (eds Sweet, W. C. Bergström, S. M.), pp. 63–82. Geological Society of America, Memoir 127.Google Scholar
Fåhraeus, L. E. & Nowlan, G. S. 1978. Franconian (Late Cambrian) to Early Champlainian (Middle Ordovician) conodonts from the Cow Head Group, western Newfoundland. Journal of Paleontology 52, 444–71.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A. 1983. Cambrian–Ordovician trilobites from the boundary beds in western Newfoundland and their phylogenetic significance. Special Papers in Palaeontology 30, 179–211.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A., Landing, E. & Skevington, D. 1982. Cambrian–Ordovician boundary sections in the Cow Head Group, western Newfoundland. In The Cambrian–Ordovician Boundary: Sections, Fossil Distributions and Correlations (ed. Bassett, M. G. Dean, W. T.), pp. 95–129. Cardiff: National Museum of Wales, Geological Series No. 3.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A. & Skevington, D. 1980. Correlation of Cambrian–Ordovician boundary between Europe and North America: new data from western Newfoundland. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 17, 382–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedberg, H. D. 1976 (ed.). International Stratigraphic Guide. Wiley-Interscience, 200 pp.Google Scholar
James, N. P. 1981. Megablocks of calcified algae in the Cow Head Breccia, western Newfoundland: vestiges of a Cambro-Ordovician platform margin. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 92, 790–811.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, N. P. & Stevens, R. K. 1982. Anatomy and evolution of a Lower Paleozoic continental margin. International Association of Sedimentologists, Guidebook No. 2B, 75 pp.Google Scholar
James, N. P. & Stevens, R. K. 1986. Stratigraphy and correlation of the Cambro-Ordovician Cow Head Group, western Newfoundland. Geological Survey of Canada, Bulletin 366, 143 pp.Google Scholar
Johnson, H. 1941. Paleozoic lowlands of northwestern Newfoundland. The New York Academy of Sciences, Transactions, Series II 3, (6) 141–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kindle, C. H. 1982. The C. H. Kindle Collection: Middle Cambrian to Lower Ordovician trilobites from the Cow Head Group, western Newfoundland. In Current Research Part C, Geological Survey of Canada, Paper 82–1C, 1–17.Google Scholar
Kindle, C. H. & Whittington, H. B. 1958. Stratigraphy of the Cow Head region, western Newfoundland. Geological Society of America, Bulletin 69, 315–42.Google Scholar
Kindle, C. H. & Whittington, H. B. 1959. Some stratigraphic problems of the Cow Head area in western Newfoundland. The New York Academy of Sciences, Transactions 22, 7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landing, E. 1983. Highgate Gorge: Upper Cambrian and Lower Ordovician continental slope deposition and biostratigraphy, northwestern Vermont. Journal of Paleontology 57, 1149–87.Google Scholar
Landing, E., Barnes, C. R. & Stevens, R. K. 1987. Tempo of earliest Ordovician graptolite faunal succession: conodont-based correlations from the Tremadocian of Quebec. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 23, 1928–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Logan, W. E. 1863. Geology of Canada. Geological Survey of Canada, Report of Progress from its Commencement to 1863, 983 pp.Google Scholar
McLaren, D. J. 1977. The Silurian–Devonian Boundary Committee. A final report. The Silurian–Devonian Boundary. International Union of Geological Sciences, Series A 5, 1–34, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Miller, J. F. 1969. Conodont fauna of the Notch Peak limestone (Cambro-Ordovician), House Range, Utah. Journal of Paleontology 43, 413–39.Google Scholar
Miller, J. F. 1980. Taxonomic revisions of some Upper Cambrian and Lower Ordovician conodonts with comments on their evolution. The University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions. Paper 99, 39 pp.Google Scholar
Miller, J. F. 1984. Cambrian and earliest Ordovician conodont evolution, biofacies, and provincialism. Geological Society of America, Special Paper 196, 43–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. F., Taylor, M. E., Stitt, J. H., Ethington, R. L., Hintze, L. F. & Taylor, J. F. 1982. Potential Cambro-Ordovician Boundary Stratotype Sections in the Western United States. In The Cambrian-Ordovician Boundary: Sections, Fossil Distributions, and Correlations (eds Bassett, M. G. Dean, W. T.), pp. 155–80. National Museum of Wales, Geological Series no. 3, Cardiff.Google Scholar
Müller, K. J. 1973. Late Cambrian and Early Ordovician conodonts from Northern Iran. Geological Survey of Iran, Report 30, 77. pp.Google Scholar
Nowlan, G. S. & Barnes, C. R. 1987. Thermal maturation of Paleozoic strata in Eastern Canada from conodont colour alteration index (CAI) data with implications for burial history, tectonic evolution, hot spot tracks and mineral hydrocarbon potential. Geological Survey of Canada, Bulletin 367, 47 p.Google Scholar
Nowlan, G. S. 1985. Late Cambrian and early Ordovician conodonts from the Franklinian miogeosyncline, Canadian Arctic Islands. Journal of Paleontology 59, 96–122.Google Scholar
Oxley, P. 1953. Geology of Parsons Pond – St Pauls area, west coast, Newfoundland. Newfoundland Geological Survey, Report 5, 53 pp.Google Scholar
Pohler, S. L., Barnes, C. R. & James, N. P. 1987. Reconstructing a lost faunal realm: conodonts from mega-conglomerates of the Ordovician Cow Head Group, western Newfoundland. In Conodonts: Investigative Techniques and Applications (ed. Austin, R. L.), pp. 341–362. Ellis Horwood, British Micropalaeontological Society Series.Google Scholar
Rasetti, F. 1954. Early Ordovician trilobite faunas from Quebec and Newfoundland. Journal of Paleontology 28, 581–7.Google Scholar
Rodgers, J. & Neale, E. R. W. 1963. Possible ‘Taconic’ Klippen in western Newfoundland. American Journal of Science 261, 713–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuchert, C. & Dunbar, C. O. 1934. Stratigraphy of western Newfoundland. Geological Society of America Memoir 1, 123 pp.Google Scholar
Stevens, R. K. 1970. Cambro-Ordovician flysch sedimentation and tectonics in west Newfoundland and their possible bearing as a proto-Atlantic Ocean. In Flysh Sedimentology in North America (ed. Lajoie, J.) pp. 165–77. Geological Association of Canada, Special Paper No. 7.Google Scholar
Whittington, C. H. 1963. Middle Ordovician trilobites from Lower Head, western Newfoundland. Harvard University, Museum of Comparative Zoology. Bulletin 129, 1–118.Google Scholar
Williams, H., James, N. P. & Stevens, R. K. 1985. Humber Arm Allochthon and nearby groups between Bonne Bay and Portland Creek, western Newfoundland. In Current Research, Part A, Geological Survey of Canada, Paper 82–1A, 281–8.Google Scholar
Williams, S. H. & Stevens, R. K. in press. Early Ordovician (Arenig) graptolites from the Cow Head Group, western Newfoundland. Palaeontographica Canadiana.Google Scholar