Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T19:37:00.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

IV.—The Faunas of the Ffynnon Beuno Caves, and of the Norfolk Forest Bed

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Extract

From Mr. Newton's letter in the February Number of the GEOLOGICAL MAGAZINE, I am inclined to think that he has somewhat misunderstood my meaning where I referred to the fauna of the Norfolk Forest Bedinmy paper in the December Number. Prof. Hughes had stated in his paper that the bones from the caverns “belong to the newer group of animals found elsewhere in undoubtedly Post-Glæial river deposits.” As Mr. Newton admits “that most of these species have been found in the Pre-Glacial Forest Bed of Norfolk, and it is probable that others of them will yet be found,” it is clear that I was correct in my contention that “a very large proportion of the animals occur in the Norfolk Forest Bed.”

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1887

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 105 note 1 Agassiz, L., “Rech. Poiss. Foss.” vol. iii. p. 62, pl. 10b, figs. 8–14.Google Scholar

page 105 note 2 SirEgerton, Philip, “Figures and Descriptions of British Organic Remains, Dec. xiii.” (Mem. Geol. Surv. 1872), pl. ix.Google Scholar

page 105 note 3 Hasse, C., “Palaontologische Streifziige im British Museum,” Neues Jahrb. 1883, pt. ii. p. 66.Google Scholar

page 106 note 1 MrDavies, W. mentions (Catalogue of Sir Antonio Brady's Collection, p. xxxiii) that “as we might expect from the known habits of the Felida, their remains are comparatively rare in all aqueous deposits, being more generally found in caves and rock fissures.”Google Scholar

page 106 note 2 Historical Geology, pp. 499 and 500.Google Scholar