Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T07:19:11.713Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Geophysical investigation of the Beinn an Dubhaich Granite, Skye

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

N. R. Goulty ,
C. E. Darton ,
A. E. Dent  and
K. R. Richardson
N. R. Goulty
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Durham, Science Site, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
C. E. Darton
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Durham, Science Site, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
A. E. Dent
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Durham, Science Site, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
K. R. Richardson
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Durham, Science Site, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There has been a long-standing controversy concerning the form of the Beinn an Dubhaich Granite, which intrudes Cambro-Ordovician limestones and contains enclosures of limestone at outcrop. We have undertaken a three-part geophysical investigation with the aim of resolving some issues raised by previous workers. Our most significant finding results from the measurement of a gravity profile across Beinn an Dubhaich. It reveals a negative anomaly of more than 2 mGal over the granite outcrop. Our preferred model to fit this anomaly is a steep-sided granite stock extending down to about 1 km depth, which implies that the limestone enclosures are roof pendants. In a supplementary study, we measured magnetic profiles across dykes in some of the limestone enclosures in order to determine the depth to the contact with the underlying granite. However, in the most clear-cut cases we could only determine a minimum depth of 20 m, and were unable to constrain the maximum depth. In hindsight, we suggest that microgravity surveying would be a better method for determining the thicknesses of the limestone roof pendants. In the third part of the investigation, we measured a tight grid of magnetic profiles to the northeast of the granite outcrop to test a previous suggestion that dyke-like lobes of granite intrude pre-existing fractures in the overlying limestones. We located several large magnetic anomalies associated with outcropping doleritic dykes and concluded that these had not been correctly identified in the earlier work. Consequently, the ground magnetic profiles acquired to date provide no valid evidence to support the idea of an interfingering contact between the limestones and the underlying granite.

Type
Research Article
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 133 , Issue 2 , March 1996 , pp. 171 - 176
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Present address: Bullard Laboratories, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0EZ, UK

References

Bailey, E. B., & McCallien, W. J. 1956. Composite minor intrusions and the Slieve Gullion complex, Ireland. Liverpool and Manchester Geological Journal 1, 466–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, B. R., & Harris, J. W., 1986. An Excursion Guide to the Geology of the Isle of Skye. Glasgow: Geological Society of Glasgow, 317 pp.Google Scholar
Bott, M. H. P., & Tuson, J., 1973. Deep structure beneath the Tertiary volcanic regions of Skye, Mull and Ardnamurchan, north-west Scotland. Nature, Physical Science 242, 114–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emeleus, C. H., & Gyopari, M. C., 1992. British Tertiary Volcanic Province. Geological Conservation Review, vol. 4, Joint Nature Conservation Committee. London: Chapman & Hall, 259 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goulty, N. R., Leggett, M., Douglas, T., & Emeleus, C. H., 1992. Seismic reflection test on the granite of the Skye Tertiary igneous centre. Geological Magazine 129, 633–6.Google Scholar
Harker, A., 1904. The Tertiary Igneous Rocks of Skye. Memoir of the Geological Survey of Great Britain. Edinburgh: HMSO, 481 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoersch, A. L., 1979. General structure of the Skye Tertiary igneous complex and detailed structure of the Beinn an Dubhaich Granite from magnetic evidence. Scottish Journal of Geology 15, 231–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holness, M. B., Bickle, M. J., & Graham, C. M., 1991. On the kinetics of textural equilibration in forsterite marbles. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 108,356–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, B. C., 1960. The form of the Beinn an Dubhaich Granite, Skye. Geological Magazine 97, 326–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raybould, J. G., 1973. The form of the Beinn an Dubhaich Granite, Skye, Scotland. Geological Magazine 110, 341–50.Google Scholar
Stewart, F. H., 1965. Tertiary igneous activity. In Geology of Scotland, 1st ed. (ed. Craig, G.Y.), pp. 417–65. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.Google Scholar
Whitten, E. H. T., 1961. Modal variation and the form of the Beinn an Dubhaich Granite, Skye. Geological Magazine 98, 467–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar