Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T11:56:50.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Post-Glacial Pelicans in Britain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

C. L. Forbes ,
K. A. Joysey  and
R. G. West
C. L. Forbes
Affiliation:
Sedgwick Museum, Cambridge.
K. A. Joysey
Affiliation:
Museum of Zoology, Cambridge.
R. G. West
Affiliation:
Botany School, Cambridge.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A bone found in the peat near King's Lynn, Norfolk, has been identified as belonging to a pelican. This is the fifth fossil record from East Anglia but it is the first to be accurately dated, and it can be correlated with Godwin's pollen zone VII–VIII (Iron Age). Other fossil pelican bones from East Anglia and Somerset are identified as those of the Dalmatian Pelican rather than the White Pelican which now visits parts of north-west Europe.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 95 , Issue 2 , April 1958 , pp. 153 - 160
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andrews, C. W., 1899. On some remains of birds from the lake-dwellings of Glastonbury, Somersetshire. Ibis, Ser. 7, v, 351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, C. W., 1917. In Bulleid, A, and Gray, H. St. George, 1917, The Glastonbury Lake Village, ii, 631.Google Scholar
British Ornithologists' Union, 1952. Check-list of the birds of Great Britain and Ireland. London.Google Scholar
Dresser, H. E., 1881. A History of the Birds of Europe. London, vi, 191.Google Scholar
Godwin, H., 1940. Studies of the post-glacial history of British vegetation. III—Fenland pollen diagrams; IV—Post-glacial changes of relative land- and sea-level in the English fenland. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond., B, ccxxx, 239.Google Scholar
Godwin, H., and M. E., 1933. Pollen analyses of fenland peats at St. Germans, near King's Lynn. Geol. Mag., lxx, 168.Google Scholar
Gurney, J. H., 1907. Ornithological report for Norfolk (1906). Zoologist, Ser. 4, xi, 131.Google Scholar
Gurney, J. H., 1921. Early annals of ornithology. London.Google Scholar
Harmer, S. F., 1897. The pelican as an indigenous British bird. On some bones of a pelican from the Cambridgeshire fens. Trans. Norf. and Norwich Nat. Soc., vi, 363.Google Scholar
Milne-Edwards, A., 1868. On the former existence of a large pelican in the English fens. Ibis, Ser. 2, iv, 363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, A., 1868 a. Note. Proc. Zool. Soc. for 1868, 2.Google Scholar
Newton, A., 1868 b. Editorial note to Milne-Edwards (1868) paper.Google Scholar
Newton, A., 1871. Note. for 1871, 702.Google Scholar
Newton, A., 1901. On some cranes' bones found in Norfolk. Trans. Norf. and Norwich Nat. Soc., vii, 158.Google Scholar
Newton, E. T., 1928. Pelican in Yorkshire peat. The Naturalist for 1928, 167.Google Scholar
Patterson, A. H., 1916. Miscellaneous notes from Great Yarmouth. Zoologist, Ser. 4, xx, 364.Google Scholar
Saunders, S., 1906. Pelecanus onocrotalus at Whitstable. Zoologist, Ser. 4, x, 431.Google Scholar
Tristam, H. B., 1856. Pelican found dead on the coast of Durham, Zoologist, xiv, 5321.Google Scholar
Winge, H., 1901. Letter to the Editor. Ibis, Ser. 8, i, 516.Google Scholar