Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-01T19:45:52.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

II.—Some New Genera and Species of Cretaceous Cheilostome Polyzoa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

W. D. Lang
W. D. Lang
Affiliation:
Trustees of the British Museum.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Herpetopora Anglica, the genotype of the new genus Herpetopora, described in this Magazine, was the name proposed for a new species that hitherto had been wrongly recorded as Hippothoa dispersa (Hagenow). It was then remarked that the English form did not belong to the genus Hippothoa, of which the genotype is H. divaricata; but, while Herpetopora was proposed for the English species, no suggestion was made for a genus to include Hippothoa dispersa (Hagenow) that certainly could not remain under Hippothoa. It is proposed here to describe in detail Hagenow's species, to give it a generic name, and, further, to consider some allied forms.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 1 , Issue 10 , October 1914 , pp. 436 - 444
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1914

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 436 note 1 Geol. Mag., Dec. VI, Vol. I, pp. 5 and 6, 1914.

page 436 note 2 For references see p. 438.

page 436 note 3 Lamouroux, , Exposition Mėthodique des genres de l'Ordre des Polypiers, p. 82, 1821.Google Scholar

page 436 note 4 For references see p. 439.

page 436 note 5 D'Orbigny, Prodrome de Paléontologie Stratigraphique universelle, vol. ii, p. 263, 1850.Google Scholar

page 436 note 6 Bronn, & Roemer, , Lethæa Geognostica, vol. ii, pt. v, p. 106, 1851–1852.Google Scholar

page 436 note 7 See a criticism by Canu, Revue critique de Paléozoologie, vol. xviii, p. 90, 1914.Google Scholar

page 436 note 8 δàλλâs, ‘a sausage’; suggested by the strings of zoœcia.

page 436 note 9 For references see p. 437.

page 438 note 1 Invented to mean ‘resembling a Stomatopora'’, from the cylindrical shape of the zoœcia.

page 438 note 2 Named after Theodor Marsson, the monographer of the Chalk Polyzoa of RÜgen.

page 438 note 3 For references see p. 439.

page 438 note 4 Linnæus, Systema Naturœ, 12th ed., vol. i, pt. ii, p. 1285, 1766.

page 440 note 1 ťÓ δákpu, ‘a tear,’ ‘a drop,’ from the shape of the zoœcium.

page 440 note 2 For references see these authors' names under the several species.

page 440 note 3 i.e. of the general shape of the orifice in the family Cribrilinidæ.

page 441 note 1 De, Blainville, Manuel d'Actinologie, p. 447, 1834. Includes eleven genosyntypes.Google Scholar

page 441 note 2 D'orbigny, , loc. cit., see p. 436, 1850.Google Scholar

page 447 note 3 Hincks, , Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. IV, vol. xx, p. 526, 1877. Genotype, Eschara ciliata, Pallas.Google Scholar

page 447 note 4 Edwards, , in Lamarck, Histoire Naturelle des Animaux sans Vertèbres, 2nd ed., vol. ii, p. 230, 1836.Google Scholar

page 447 note 5 Lamouroux, , Exposition Mèthodique des genres de l'Ordre des Polypiers, 1821, p. 82. See p. 436.Google Scholar

page 447 note 6 Jullien, , Mission Scientifique du Cap Horn, 1882–3, tom, vi, Zoologie—Bryozoaires, p. 28, 1888. Genotype, Cellepora hyalina, Linnæus, Systema Naturœ, 12th ed., vol. i, pt. ii, p. 1286, 1767.Google Scholar

page 447 note 7 i.e. of the general shape of the apertures in the family Myriozoidæ.

page 442 note 1 gutta, ‘a drop’—an echo of the generic name.