Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-w95db Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-19T02:57:29.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A possible source of primary nucleotide chain breaks in recombinant structures in eukaryotes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

P. J. Hastings
P. J. Hastings
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

It is argued that the primary break-points for meiotic recombination arise from the replication of regions in which DNA synthesis is delayed until meiotic prophase. The gaps would be in nucleotide chains of opposite polarity in sister chromatids. This would place a restriction on the recombination models of Holliday and of Whitehouse, so that neither is able to explain observed chromatid interference. It follows that if the primary breaks originate in the manner proposed here, the Whitehouse and Holliday models are either both wrong or both right.

Type
Short Paper
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , October 1972 , pp. 253 - 256
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

References

REFERENCES

Chiu, S. M. & Hastings, P. J. (1972). Premeiotic DNA synthesis and the recombination in Chlamydomonas reinhardi. Genetics (in the Press).Google Scholar
Fogel, F. & Hurst, D. D. (1967). Meiotic gene conversion in yeast tetrads and the theory of recombination. Genetics 57, 455–481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hastings, P. J. & Whitehouse, H. L. K. (1964). A polaron model of genetic recombination by the formation of hybrid DNA. Nature 201, 1052–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holliday, R. (1964). A mechanism for gene conversion in fungi. Genetical Research 5, 283–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holliday, R. (1968). Genetic recombination in fungi. In Replication and Recombination of Genetic Material (ed. by Peacock, W. J. and Brock, R. D.), pp. 157–174. Canberra.Google Scholar
Hotta, Y. & Stern, H. (1971). Analysis of DNA synthesis during meiotic prophase in Lilium. Journal of Molecular Biology 55, 337–355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huberman, J. A. & Riggs, A. D. (1968). On the mechanism of DNA replication in mammalian chromosomes. Journal of Molecular Biology 32, 327–341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitani, Y. & Olive, L. S. (1969). Genetics of Sordaria fimicola. VII. Gene conversion at the g locus in interallelic crosses. Genetics 62, 23–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paszewski, A. (1970). Gene conversion: observations on the DNA hybrid models. Genetical Research 15, 55–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perkins, D. D. (1955). Tetrads and crossing over. Journal of Cellular and Comparative Physiology 45 (Suppl. 2), 119–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rees, H. & Evans, G. M. (1966). A correlation between the localisation of chiasmata and the replication patterns of chromosomal DNA. Experimental Cell Research 44, 161–164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roth, T. F. & Ito, M. (1967). DNA-dependent formation of the synaptinemal complex at meiotic prophase. Journal of Cell Biology 35, 247–255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitehouse, H. L. K. (1963). A theory of crossing-over by means of hybrid deoxyribo-nucleic acid. Nature 199, 1034–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehouse, H. L. K. (1966). An operator model of crossing-over. Nature 211, 708–713.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitehouse, H. L. K. & Hastings, P. J. (1965). The analysis of genetic recombination on the polaron hybrid DNA model. Genetical Research 6, 27–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed