Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-11T11:48:28.464Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phenotypic characterization and genetic analysis of twenty dominant cataract mutations detected in offspring of irradiated male mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Jana Kratochvilova  and
Jack Favor
Jana Kratochvilova
Affiliation:
Institut für Säugetiergenetik, Gesellschaft für Strahlen- und Umweltforschung, D-8042 Neuherberg, Federal Republic of Germany
Jack Favor
Affiliation:
Institut für Säugetiergenetik, Gesellschaft für Strahlen- und Umweltforschung, D-8042 Neuherberg, Federal Republic of Germany
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Twenty autosomal dominant cataract mutations were detected among the offspring of male mice irradiated with γ- or X-rays. The single or fractionated doses ranged from 5.34 to 10.2 Gy. The phenotypic manifestation and penetrance of the mutations as well as fertility and viability of the mutants were studied by extensive breeding. Manifestation of 4 mutations was limited to the lens. Sixteen mutations were characterized by multiple ocular anomalies, of which 4 mutations also affected other organs of the body. Seventy per cent of the mutations caused severe opacity of the lens or lens and cornea. Homologous hereditary diseases in man would be juvenile cataracts with serious impairment of vision or blindness. Expressivity of the lens opacities was almost constant whereas the accompanied defects varied with respect to their severity in different individuals as well as in eyes of an individual. Phenotypic differences dependent on the genetic background could not be observed. Fourteen mutations were classified as mutations with complete penetrance without any effect on viability and fertility of heterozygotes. Four other mutations were shown to be fully penetrant but the viability of the heterozygotes was impaired. Two mutations had incomplete penetrance with no viability or fertility effects. Of the 14 mutations with complete penetrance and normal viability and fertility 6 were shown to be homozygous viable, 1 semi-lethal and 7 lethal.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 52 , Issue 2 , October 1988 , pp. 125 - 134
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

References

Ehling, U. H. (1983). Cataracts - indicators for dominant mutations in mice and man. In Utilization of Mammalian Specific Locus Studies in Hazard Evaluation and Estimation of Genetic Risk (ed. de Serres, F. J. & Sheridan, W.), pp. 169–190. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Ehling, U. H. (1987). Quantifizierung des strahlengenetischen Risikos. Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 163, 283–291.Google Scholar
Ehling, U. H. & Favor, J. (1984). Recessive and dominant mutations in mice. In Mutation, Cancer and Malformation (ed. Chu, E. H. Y. & Generoso, W. M.), pp. 389–428. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehling, U. H., Favor, J., Kratochvilova, J. & Neuhäuser-Klaus, A. (1982). Dominant cataract mutations and specific-locus mutations in mice induced by radiation or ethylnitrosourea. Mutation Research 92, 181–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ehling, U. H. & Neuhäuser, A. (1979). Procarbazine-induced specific-locus mutations in male mice. Mutation Research 59, 245–256.Google Scholar
Favor, J. (1983). A comparison of the dominant cataract and recessive specific-locus mutation rates induced by treatment of male mice with ethylnitrosourea. Mutation Research 110, 367–382.Google Scholar
Favor, J. (1984). Characterization of dominant cataract mutations in mice: penetrance, fertility and homozygous viability of mutations recovered after 250 mg/kg ethylnitrosourea paternal treatment. Genetical Research 44, 183–197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Favor, J. (1986). The frequency of dominant cataract and recessive specific-locus mutations in mice derived from 80 or 160 mg ethylnitrosourea per kg body weight treated spermatogonia. Mutation Research 162, 61–80.Google Scholar
Favor, J., Neuhäuser-Klaus, A. & Ehling, U. H. (1987). Radiation-induced forward and reverse specific locus mutations and dominant cataract mutations in treated strain BALB/c and DBA/2 male mice. Mutation Research 177, 161–169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fukui, H. N., Merola, L. M., Fukushi, S. & Kinoshita, J. H. (1980). Nakano mouse cataract. In Red Blood Cell and Lens Metabolism (ed. Srivastava, S. K.), pp. 389–404. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Graw, J., Favor, J., Neuhäuser-Klaus, A. & Ehling, U. H. (1986). Dominant cataract and recessive specific locus mutations in offspring of X-irradiated male mice. Mutation Research 159, 47–54.Google Scholar
Green, E. L. (1981). Catalog of mutant genes and polymorphic loci. In Genetic Variants and Strains of the Laboratory Mouse (ed. Green, M. C.), pp. 8–28. Stuttgart, New York: Fisher.Google Scholar
Hogan, B. L. M., Hetherington, C. M. & Lyon, M. F. (1987). Allelism of small eyes Sey with Dickie's small eye on chr. 2. Mouse News Letter 77, 135–138.Google Scholar
Hogan, B. L. M., Horsburgh, G., Cohen, J., Hetherington, C. M., Fisher, G. & Lyon, M. F. (1986). Small eyes (Sey): a homozygous lethal mutation on chromosome 2 which affects the differentiation of both lens and nasal placodes in the mouse. Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology 97, 95–110.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, H. (1980). Genetical and morphological studies on congenital cataracts and microphthalmia (Cts) in mice. Congenital Anomalies 20, 391–398.Google Scholar
Kratochvilova, J. (1981). Dominant cataract mutations detected in offspring of gamma-irradiated male mice. Journal of Heredity 72, 302–307.Google Scholar
Kratochvilova, J. & Ehling, U. H. (1979). Dominant cataract mutations induced by gamma-irradiation of male mice. Mutation Research 63, 221–223.Google Scholar
Lyon, M. F., Jarvis, S. E., Sayers, I. & Holmes, R. S. (1981). Lens opacity: a new gene for congenital cataract on chromosome 10 of the mouse. Genetical Research 38, 337–341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muggleton-Harris, A. L., Festing, M. F. W. & Hall, M. (1987). A gene location for the inheritance of the Cataract Fraser (CatFr) mouse congenital cataract. Genetical Research 49, 235–238.Google Scholar
Oda, S., Watanabe, T. & Kondo, K. (1980). A new mutation, eye lens obsolescence, Elo on chromosome 1 in the mouse. Japanese Journal of Genetics 55, 71–75.Google Scholar
Peters, J. (1987). Mouse News Letter 77.Google Scholar
Phillips, A. J. S. & Cattanach, B. M. (1975). Handbook of Breeding Techniques. Genetics Group MRC Radiobiology Unit, Harwell, United Kingdom (private communication).Google Scholar
Roberts, R. C. (1967). Small-eyes, a new dominant mutant in the mouse. Genetical Research 9, 121–122.Google Scholar
Russell, L. B. (1983). Qualitative analysis of mouse specific-locus mutations: Information on genetic organization, gene expression, and the chromosomal nature of induced lesions. Environmental Science Research 28, 241–258.Google Scholar
Sanyal, S. & Hawkins, R. K. (1979). Dysgenetic lens (dyl)-a new gene in the mouse. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 18, 642–645.Google ScholarPubMed
Searle, A. G. (1965). Mouse News Letter 33, 29.Google Scholar
Teicher, L. S. & Caspari, E. W. (1978). The genetics of blind - a lethal factor in mice. Journal of Heredity 69, 86–90.Google Scholar
Theiler, K., Varnum, D. S. & Stevens, L. C. (1978). Development of Dickie's small eye, a mutation in the house mouse. Anatomy and Embryology 155, 81–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waardenburg, P. J., Franceschetti, A. & Klein, D. (1961). Genetics and Ophthalmology, vol. 1. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Waring, G. O. III, Rodrigues, M. M. & Laibson, P. R. (1975). Anterior chamber cleavage syndrome. A step-ladder classification. Survey of Ophthalmology 20, 3–27.Google Scholar
West, J. D. & Fisher, G. (1985). Inherited cataracts in inbred mice. Genetical Research 46, 45–56.Google Scholar
West, J. D. & Fisher, G. (1986). Further experience of the mouse dominant cataract mutation test from an experiment with ethylnitrosourea. Mutation Research 164, 127–136.Google Scholar
West, J. D., Lyon, M. F., Peters, J. & Selby, P. B. (1985). Genetic differences between substrains of the inbred mouse strain 101 and designation of a new strain 102. Genetical Research 46, 349–352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zwaan, J. (1980). Genetically determined lens abnormalities. In Red Blood Cell and Lens Metabolism (ed. Srivastava, S. K.), pp. 415–422. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar