Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T17:07:36.103Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does monozygotic twinning occur in mice?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Anne McLaren ,
Paul Molland  and
Esther Signer
Anne McLaren*
Affiliation:
MRC Mammalian Development Unit, London
Paul Molland
Affiliation:
MRC Mammalian Development Unit, London
Esther Signer
Affiliation:
Dept of Genetics, University of Leicester
*
* Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Published reports suggest that the incidence of monozygotic twinning in women is increased after hormonally induced ovulation. Since some statistical evidence exists to indicate that monozygotic twinning may also occur in mice, we attempted to devise a mouse system in which the incidence of such twinning could be compared after spontaneous versus hormonally induced ovulation, in order to analyse the developmental basis of such an effect. We used phenotypic identity in litters segregating for ten genetic loci (not all independent) to indicate possible twin pairs. DNA fingerprinting using three human minisatellite probes was then performed blind on these pairs and on sibling controls. From a total of over 2000 mice born, 40 apparently identical pairs were identified, on which DNA finger-printing was successfully carried out on 35 pairs. All proved to be derived from different zygotes. We conclude that monozygotic twin pairs are either extremely rare in the stock of mice that we studied, or have such reduced viability that their chance of surviving to weaning is low.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 66 , Issue 3 , December 1995 , pp. 195 - 202
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

References

REFERENCES

Armour, J. A. L., Wong, Z., Wilson, V., Royle, N. J., and Jeffreys, A. J., (1989) Sequences flanking the repeat arrays flanking the human minisatellites: association with dispersed repeat elements. Nucleic Acids Research 13, 4925–4935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateman, A. J., (1960) Dichorial one-egg twins in the mouse. Nature 187, 339–340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bodeman, E., (1935). A case of uniovular twins in the mouse. Anatomical Record 62, 291–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
M., Buehr, and McLaren, A., (1985) Expression of glucosephosphate isomerase in relation to growth of the mouse oocyte in vivo and in vitro. Gamete Research 11, 271–281.Google Scholar
Bulmer, M. G., (1970) The biology of twinning in Man. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Carter, R. E., Wetton, J. H., and Parker, D. T., (1989) Improved genetic fingerprinting using RNA probes. Nucleic Acids Research 17, 5867.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castle, W. E., Gates, W. H., Reed, S. C., and Snell, G. D., (1936) Identical twins in a mouse cross. Science 84, 2191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, R. J., (1965) In Discussion, p 215. Preimplantation stages of pregnancy (eds Wolstenholme, G. E. W., and O'Connor, M.), Ciba Fndn. Symp. Churchill: London.Google Scholar
Derom, C., Vlietinck, R., Derom, R., Van den Berghe, H., and Thiery, M., (1987). Increased monozygotic twinning rate after ovulation induction. Lancet i, 1236–1238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, R., Mattler, L., Walters, D., (1986) Identical twins and in vitro fertilization. Journal of In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer, 3, 114–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feinberg, A. P., and Vogelstein, B. (1983) A technique for radiolabelling restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity. Analytical Biochemistry 137, 266–7.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A., and Mather, K., (1936) A linkage test with mice. Annals of Eugenics 7, 265–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gluecksohn-Schoenheimer, S., (1949) The effects of a lethal mutation responsible for duplications and twinning in mouse embryos. Journal of Experimental Zoology 110, 47–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, C. V., (1934) Occurrence of uniovular twins in multiple births. Science 80, 616.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, A. V. S., and Jeffreys, A. J., (1985) Use of minisatellite probes for determination of twin zygosity at birth. Lancet ii, 1394–1395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, B., F., Costantini, and Lacy, E., (1986) Manipulating the mouse embryo. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, A. J., Wilson, V., and Thein, S. L., (1985 a) Hypervariable minisatellite regions in human DNA. Nature 314, 67–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeffreys, A. J., Wilson, V., and Thein, S. L., (1985 b) Individual-specific ‘fingerprints’ of human DNA. Nature 316: 76–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeffreys, A. J., Wilson, V., Kelly, R., Taylor, B., and Bulfield, G., (1987) Mouse DNA ‘Fingerprints’: Analysis of chromosome localisation and germ-line stability of hyper variable loci in recombinant inbred strains. Nucleic Acids Research 15, 2823–2836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, R., Bulfield, G., Collick, A., Gibbs, M., and Jeffreys, A. J., (1989) Characterization of a highly unstable mouse minisatellite locus: evidence for somatic mutation during early development. Genomics 5, 844–856.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLaren, A., and Bowman, P., (1969) Mouse chimaeras derived from fusion of embryos differing by nine genetic factors. Nature 224, 238–240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLaren, A., and Michie, D., (1959 a) Superpregnancy in the mouse. Implantation and foetal mortaility after induced superovulation in females of various ages. Journal of Experimental Biology 36, 281–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaren, A., and Michie, D., (1959 b) Experimental studies on placental fusion in mice. Journal of Experimental Zoology 141, 47–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
A., McLaren, and Michie, D., (1960) Control of prenatal growth in mammals. Nature 187, 363–365.Google Scholar
Motomura, K., Tateishi, H., Nishisho, I., Okazaki, M., Miki, T., Touomura, A., Takai, S., Mori, T., and Jeffreys, A. J., (1987) The Zygosity determination of Japanese twins using minisatellite core probe. Japanese Journal of Human Genetics 32, 9–14.Google ScholarPubMed
Signer, E. N., (1989) DNA-Fingerprints zur Ueberwachung der Reinerbigkeit von Maeuse-Inzuchtstaemmen. Dissertation. Veterinary Faculty of University of Zuerich. Hartung-Gorre Verlag, Konstanz.Google Scholar
Signer, E. N., and Jeffreys, A. J. (1992) Both ‘hot’ and ‘cold’ transcripts of minisatellites 33.15 and 33.6 produce informative DNA fingerprints in pigs. Fingerprint News 2, 3–7.Google Scholar
Signer, E. N., and Jeffreys, A. J. (1993) Application of human minisatellite probes to the development of informative DNA fingerprints and the isolation of locus-specific markers in animals. In: DNA Fingerprinting: State of the Science. Pena, S. D. J., Chakraborty, R., Epplen, J. T., and Jeffreys, A. J., (eds). Birkhaeuser Verlag Basel/Switzerland, pp. 421–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, W. L., (1937) A test for uniovular twins in mice. Annals of Eugenics 8, 70–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarkowski, A. K., (1965) Embryonic and postnatal development of mouse chimeras. In: Preimplantation Stages of Pregnancy (eds Wolstenholme, G. W. E., and O'Connor, M.), Ciba Fndn. Symp., pp. 183–207. Churchill: London.Google Scholar
Tsunoda, Y., and McLaren, A., (1983) Effect of various procedures on the viability of mouse embryos containing half the normal number of blastomeres. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 69, 315–322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallace, M. E., and Williams, D. A., (1965) Monozygotic twinning in mice. Journal of Medical Genetics 2, 26–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wong, Z., Wilson, V., Jeffreys, A. J., and Theirn, S. L., (1986) Cloning a selected fragment from a human DNA ‘fingerprint’: isolation of an extremely polymorphic minisatellite. Nucleic Acids Research 14, 4605–4616.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed