Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T06:00:54.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The distribution of the fraction of the genome identical by descent in finite random mating populations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

P. Stam
P. Stam
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, Agricultural University, 53 Generaal Foulkesweg, 6703 BM, Wageningen, The Netherlands
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The probability distribution of the heterogenic (non-identical by descent) fraction of the genome in a finite monoecious random mating population has been derived. It was assumed that in any generation the length of both heterogenic and homogenic segments are exponentially distributed. An explicit expression is given for the expected number of ‘external junctions’ (sites that mark the end of a heterogenic segment) per unit map length in any generation. The latter necessitates the introduction of two higher-order identity relations between three genes, and their recurrence relations. Theoretical results were compared with the outcome of a series of simulation runs (showing a very good fit), as well as with the results predicted by Fisher's ‘theory of junctions’. In contrast to Fisher's approach, which only applies when the average heterogeneity is relatively small, the present model applies to any generation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , April 1980 , pp. 131 - 155
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

References

REFERENCES

Avery, P. J. (1978). The effect of finite population size on models of linked overdominant loci. Genetical Research 31, 239–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avery, P. J. & Hill, W. G. (1979). Variance in quantitative traits due to linked dominant genes and variance in heterozygosity in small populations. Genetics (to appear).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennet, J. H. (1953). Junctions in inbreeding. Genetica 26, 392–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennet, J. H. (1954). The distribution of heterogeneity upon inbreeding. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 16, 88–99.Google Scholar
Cockerham, C. C. (1971). Higher order probability functions of identity of alleles by descent. Genetics 69, 235–246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cockerham, C. C. & Weir, B. (1968). Sib mating with two linked loci. Genetics 60, 629–640.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cox, D. R. (1962). Renewal Theory. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Cox, D. R. & Smith, W. L. (1961). Queues. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1949). The Theory of Inbreeding. London: Oliver & Boyd. (2nd edition, 1963.)Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1954). A fuller theory of ‘junctions’ in inbreeding. Heredity 8, 187–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1959). An algebraically exact examination of junction formation and transmission in parent–offspring inbreeding. Heredity 13, 179–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, I. R. (1977). The distribution of the proportion of the genome which is homozygous by descent in inbred individuals. Theoretical Population Biology 11, 60–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franklin, I. R. & Lewontin, R. C. (1970). Is the gene the unit of selection? Genetics 65, 707–734.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, D. L. (1964). Genotypic covariances between inbred relatives. Genetics 50, 1319–1348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewontin, R. C. (1974). The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change. New York and London: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Robertson, A. (1977). Artificial selection with a large number of linked loci. In Proceedings, International Conference on Quantitative Genetics. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Stam, P. (1979). Interference in genetic crossing over and chromosome mapping. Genetics 92, 573–594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sved, J. A. (1977). Linkage disequilibrium and homozygosity of chromosome segments in finite populations. Theoretical Population Biology 2, 125–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sved, J. A. & Feldmann, M. W. (1973). Correlation and probability methods for one and two loci. Theoretical Population Biology 4, 129–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weir, B. & Cockerham, C. C. (1974). Behaviour of pairs of loci in finite monoecious populations. Theoretical Population Biology 6, 323–354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wills, C., Crenshaw, J. & Vitale, J. (1969). A computer model allowing maintenance of large amounts of genetic variability in Mendelian populations. I. Assumptions and results for large populations. Genetics 64, 107–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar