Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-swqlm Total loading time: 0.669 Render date: 2021-12-01T23:06:52.613Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

The place of the vacuum extractor in modern obstetric practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2008

Aldo Vacca*
Affiliation:
Mater Misericordiae Mothers' Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
*
Aldo Vacca, Director of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mater Misericordiae Mothers' Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Bergsjø, P, Schmidt, E, Pusch, D. Differences in the reported frequencies of some obstetrical interventions in Europe. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1983; 90: 628–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2 Lomas, J, Enkin, M. Variations in operative delivery rates. In: Chalmers, I, Enkin, M, Keirse, MJNC eds, Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989: 1182–95.Google Scholar
3 Chalmers, JA, Chalmers, I. The obstetric vacuum extractor is the instrument of first choice for operative vaginal delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 96: 505506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4 Johanson, R, Pusey, J, Livera, N, Jones, P. North Staffordshire/Wigan assisted delivery trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 96: 537–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5 Vacca, A, Keirse, MJNC. Instrumental vaginal delivery. In: Chalmers, I, Enkin, M, Keirse, MJNC eds, Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989: 1216–33.Google Scholar
6 Malmström, T. The vacuum extractor, an obstetrical instrument. Acta Obstet Gynaecol Scand 1957; 36 Suppl 3: 550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 Lindgren, L. The causes of foetal head moulding in labour. Acta Obstet Gynaecol Scand 1960; 39: 4662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8 Rydberg, E. In: The mechanism of labour, Springfield: Charles C Thomas, 1954: 373.Google Scholar
9 Bird, GC. The importance of flexion in vacuum extractor delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1976; 83: 194200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10 Malmström, T, Jansson, I. Use of the vacuum extractor. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1965; 8: 893913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11 Wiqvist, N. The Silc Cup – a new obstetrical instrument. In: Manual of Vacuum Extraction, Gothenburg: Mennox AB, 1984.Google Scholar
12 Halme, J. The vacuum extractor for obstetric delivery. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1982; 25: 167–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13 Ott, WJ. Vacuum extraction. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1975; 30: 643–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14 Bird, GC. The use of the Malmström vacuum extractor in operative obstetrics. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 1966; 6: 242–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15 Bird, GC. The use of the vacuum extractor. Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1982; 9: 641–61.Google Scholar
16 Vacca, A. Unpublished observations, 1979.Google Scholar
17 Lancet, M. Use of the vacuum extractor. Br Med J 1963; 1: 165–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18 de Villiers, JN, Bornman, JJ. Vacuum extraction – a review and assessment. S Afr Med J 1963; 37: 574–82.Google ScholarPubMed
19 Simons, EG, Philpott, RH. The vacuum extractor. Tropical Doctor 1973; 3: 3437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20 Iffy, L, Lancet, M, Kessler, I. The vacuum extractor. In: Iffy, L, Charles, D eds, Operative perinatology, New York: Macmillan, 1984: 582–94.Google Scholar
21 Chalmers, JA. The ventouse, the obstetric vacuum extractor. London: Lloyd-Luke, 1971.Google Scholar
22 Bird, GC. Modification of Malmström's vacuum extractor. Br Med J 1969; 3: 526.Google Scholar
23 Bird, GC. Vacuum-extractor manual. Gothenburg: Mennox AB, 1982.Google Scholar
24 Thiery, M. Obstetric vacuum extraction. In: Wynn, RM ed. Obstetrics and gynecology annual, Norwalk: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1985: 73111.Google Scholar
25 Huntingford, PJ. The vacuum extractor in the treatment of delay in first stage of labour. Lancet 1961; 1: 1054–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26 Chukwudebelu, WO. Vacuum extraction before full cervical dilatation. Int Surg 1978; 63: 8990.Google Scholar
27 Chamberlain, G. Forceps and vacuum extraction. Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1980; 7: 511–27.Google ScholarPubMed
28 Greis, JB, Bieniarz, J, Scommegna, A. Comparison of maternal and fetal effects of vacuum extraction with forceps or caesarean section. Obstet Gynecol 1981; 57: 571–77.Google ScholarPubMed
29 Moolgaoker, A. A safe alternative to caesarean section? J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 1970; 77: 1077–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30 Chalmers, JA. The use of the vacuum extractor to accelerate the first and second stages of labour. Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1975; 2: 203–20.Google Scholar
31 Pritchard, JA, MacDonald, PC. Dystocia caused by pelvic contraction. In: William's obstetrics. Norwalk: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1976: 699715.Google Scholar
32 Crichton, D. A reliable method of establishing the level of the fetal head in obstetrics. S Afr Med J 1974; 48: 784–87.Google Scholar
33 Philpott, RH. The recognition of cephalopelvie disproportion. Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1982; 9: 609–24.Google Scholar
34 Myerscough, PR. Intranatal welfare of the infant. In: Myerscough, PR ed, Munro Kerr's operative obstetrics, London: Baillière Tindall, 1982: 2135.Google Scholar
35 Stewart, KS. In: Myerscough, PR ed, Munro Kerr's operative obstetrics, London: Baillière Tindall, 1982: 32.Google Scholar
36 Vacca, A, Grant, A, Wyatt, G, Chalmers, I. Portsmouth operative delivery trial: a comparison of vacuum extraction and forceps delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1983; 90: 1107–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37 Fahmy, K, Gharli, A. The place of vacuum extraction in prolapsed pulsating cord. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 1977; 17: 3639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38 Bird, GC. Subcutaneous symphysiotomy in association with the vacuum extractor. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 1967; 74: 266–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39 Gebbie, D. Symphysiotomy. Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1982; 9: 663–83.Google ScholarPubMed
40 Lange, P. Clinical experience with the vacuum extractor. Dan Med Bull 1961; 8: 1116.Google ScholarPubMed
41 Chalmers, I, Richards, M. Intervention and causal inference in obstetric practice. In: Chard, T, Richards, M eds, Benefits and hazards of the new obstetrics, London: Heinemann, 1977: 3461.Google Scholar
42 Lancet, M, Borenstein, R. Vaginal instrumental extraction – changing trends. In: Iffy, L, Charles, D eds, Operative perinatology, New York: Macmillan, 1984: 554–61.Google Scholar
43 Garcia, J, Anderson, J, Vacca, A, Elbourne, D, Grant, A, Chalmers, I. Views of women and their medical and midwifery attendants about instrumental delivery using vacuum extraction and forceps. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 1985; 4: 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44 Malmström, T. Vacuum extractor – an obstetrical instrument. Acta Obstet Gynaecol Scand 1954; 33: Suppl 4:Google ScholarPubMed
45 Halkin, V. Une modification de la ventouse de Malmström. Bull Soc Roy Belge Gynécol Obstét 1964; 34: 145–50.Google Scholar
46 Løvset, J. Modern techniques of vaginal operative delivery in cephalic presentation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1965; 44: 102–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47 O'Neil, AGB, Skull, E, Michael, C. A new method of traction for the vacuum cup. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 1981; 21: 2425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48 Ottolini, JL. Instructions for the silastic obstetrical vacuum cup. Midland, Michigan: Dow Corning Corporation, 1980.Google Scholar
49 Neward Enterprises Incorporated. The Mityvac obstetrical vacuum extraction system. Cucamonga, California, 1987.Google Scholar
50 Thiery, M, Van Den Broecke, R, Kermans, G et al. A randomised study of two cups for vacuum extraction. J Perinat Med 1987; 15: 129–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
51 Carmody, F, Grant, A, Somchiwong, M. Vacuum extractor: a randomised comparison of the New Generation cup with the original Bird cup. J Perinat Med 1986; 14: 95100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
52 Dell, DL, Sightler, SE, Plauché, WC. Soft cup vacuum extraction: a comparison of outlet delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 66: 624–28.Google ScholarPubMed
53 Berkus, MD, Ramamurthy, RS, O'Connor, PS, Brown, K, Hayashi, RH. Cohort study of Silastic obstetric vacuum cup deliveries: 1, safety of the instrument. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 66: 503509.Google Scholar
54 Hastie, SJ, MacLean, AB. Comparison of the use of the Silastic obstetric vacuum extractor to Kielland's forceps. Asia-Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol 1986; 12: 6368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
55 Hammarström, M, Csemiczky, G, Belfrage, P. Comparison between the conventional Malmström extractor and a new extractor with Silastic cup. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1986; 65: 791–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
56 Cohn, M, Barclay, C, Fraser, R et al. A multicentre randomised trial comparing delivery with a silicone rubber cup and rigid metal vacuum extractor cups. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 96: 545–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
57 Wider, JA, Erez, S, Steer, CM. An evaluation of the vacuum extractor in a series of 201 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1967; 98: 2431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
58 Lasbrey, AH, Orchard, CD, Crichton, D. A study of the relative merits and scope for vacuum extraction as opposed to forceps delivery. S Afr J Obstet Gynaecol 1964; 2: 13.Google Scholar
59 Pearse, WH. Forceps versus spontaneous delivery. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1965; 8: 813–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
60 Moolgaoker, AS, Ahamed, SOS, Payne, PR. A comparison of different methods of instrumental delivery based on electronic measurements of compression and traction. Obstet Gynecol 1979; 54: 299309.Google Scholar
61 Constantine, G, Basu, SN, Hampton, N. Alternative vacuum supplies for Ventouse deliveries. BrJ Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 96: 249–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
62 Pearson, MJ. Alternative vacuum supplies for ventouse deliveries (letter to the editor). Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 96: 751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
63 Larsen, JV. The vacuum extractor and the left lateral position. S Afr Med J 1977; 51: 492.Google ScholarPubMed
64 Svenningsen, L. Birth progression and traction forces developed under vacuum extraction after slow or rapid application of suction. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1987; 26: 105–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
65 Nyirjesy, I, Hawks, BL, Falls, HC, Munsat, TL, Pierce, WE. A comparative clinical study of the vacuum extractor and forceps. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1963; 85: 1071–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
66 Hoult, IJ, MacLennan, AH, Carrie, LES. Lumbar epidural analgesia in labour: relation to fetal malposition and instrumental delivery. Br Med J 1977; 1: 1416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
67 Jouppila, R, Jouppila, P, Karinen, JM, Hollmen, A. Segmental epidural and analgesia in labour: related to the progress of labour, fetal malposition and instrumental delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1979; 58: 135–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
68 Kaminski, HM, Stafl, A, Aiman, J. The effect of epidural analgesia on the frequency of instrumental obstetric delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 69: 770–73.Google ScholarPubMed
69 Ehlers, N, Jensen, IK, Hansen, KB. Retinal haemorrhages in the newborn – a comparison of delivery by forceps and by vacuum extractor. Acta Ophthalmol 1974; 52: 7382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
70 O'Driscoll, K, Jackson, RJA, Gallagher, JT. Active management of labour and cephalopelvic disproportion. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 1970; 77: 385–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
71 Chalmers, JA. The management of malrotation of the occiput. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 1968; 75: 889–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
72 Editorial. A safe alternative to caesarean section? Obstet Gynecol Surv 1971; 26: 515–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
73 Schenker, JG, Serr, DM. Comparative study of delivery by vacuum extractor and forceps. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1967; 98: 3239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
74 Fahmy, K. Uterine rupture and vacuum extraction. Int Gynecol Obstet 1976; 14: 509–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
75 Saling, E, Hartung, M. Analyses of tractive forces during the application of vacuum extraction. J Perinat Med 1973; 1: 245–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
76 Livnat, EJ, Fejgin, M, Scommegna, A, Bieniarz, J, Burd, L. Neonatal acid-base balance in spontaneous and instrumental vaginal deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1978; 52: 549–51.Google ScholarPubMed
77 Derom, R, Thiery, M, Lybeer, E. The lactate pyruvate balance in relation to vacuum extraction. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 1965; 72: 892–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
78 Thiery, M, van Kets, H, Derom, R. Recording of tractive power in vacuum extractions (letter to editor). J Perinat Med 1973; 1: 291.Google Scholar
79 Leijon, I. Neurology and behaviour of newborn infants delivered by vacuum extraction on maternal indication. Acta Paediatr Scand 1980; 69: 625–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
80 Katz, Z, Lancet, M, Dgani, R, Ben-Hur, H, Zalel, Y. The beneficial effect of vacuum extraction on the fetus. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1982; 61: 337–40.Google ScholarPubMed
81 Bjerre, I, Dahlin, K. The long-term development of children delivered by vacuum extraction. Dev Med Child Neurol 1974; 16: 378–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
82 Fall, O, Rydén, G, Finnström, K, Finnström, O, Leijon, I. Forceps or vacuum extraction? A comparison of effects on the newborn infant. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1986; 65: 7580.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
83 von Barsewisch, B. Perinatal retinal haemorrhages. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
84 Egge, K, Lyng, G, Maltau, JM. Effect of instrumental delivery on the frequency and severity of retinal haemorrhages in the newborn. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1981; 60: 153–55.Google ScholarPubMed
85 Svenningsen, L, Lindemann, R, Eidal, K, Jensen, ø. Neonatal retinal hemorrhages and neurobehavior related to tractive force in vacuum extraction. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1987; 66: 165–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
86 Plauché, WC. Fetal cranial injuries related to delivery with the Malmström vacuum extractor. Obstet Gynecol 1979; 53: 750–57.Google ScholarPubMed
87 Boon, WH. Vacuum extraction in obstetrics (letter to editor). Lancet 1961; 2: 662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
88 Baerthlein, WC, Moodley, S, Stinson, SK. Comparison of maternal and neonatal morbidity in midforceps delivery and midpelvis vacuum extraction. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 67: 594–97.Google ScholarPubMed
89 Roberts, IF, Stone, M. Fetal hemorrhage: complication of vacuum extractor after fetal blood sampling. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1978; 132: 109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
90 Thiery, M. Fetal hemorrhage following blood samplings and use of vacuum extractor (letter to editor). Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979; 134: 231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
91 Plauché, WC. Subgaleal hematoma, a complication of instrumental delivery. J Am Med Assoc 1980; 244: 1597–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
92 Robinson, RJ, Rossiter, MA. Massive subaponeurotic haemorrhage in babies of African origin. Arch Dis Child 1968; 43: 684–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
93 Ahuja, GL, Willoughby, MLN, Kerr, MM, Hutchison, JH. Massive subaponeurotic haemorrhage in infants born by vacuum extraction. Br Med J 1969; 3: 743–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
94 Williams, MF, Jacobs, M, Moosa, A. Subaponeurotic haemorrhage of the newborn. S Afr Med J 1977; 52: 176–78.Google ScholarPubMed
95 Campbell, N, Harvey, D, Norman, AP. Increased frequency of neonatal jaundice in a maternity hospital. Br Med J 1975; 2: 548–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
96 Friedman, EA, Sachtleben, MR. Neonatal jaundice in association with oxytocin stimulation of labour and operative delivery. Br Med J 1976; 1: 198–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
97 Fenichel, GM, Webster, DL, Wong, WKT. Intracranial hemorrhage in the term newborn. Arch Neurol 1984; 41: 3034.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
98 Jeannin, P, Afschrift, M, Voet, D, Vandekerckhove, F, Thiery, M, Defoort, P, Derom, R. Cranial ultrasound after forceful midpelvis vacuum extraction at term. J Perinat Med 1984; 12: 319–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
99 Tudehope, DI, Vacca, A. Traumatic injuries to the nervous system. In: Levene, MI, Bennett, MJ, Punt, J eds, Fetal and neonatal neurology and neurosurgery, London: Churchill Livingstone, 1988: 393404.Google Scholar
100 Ludwig, B, Brand, M, Brockerhoff, P. Postpartum CT examination of the heads of full term infants. Neuroradiology 1980; 20: 145–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
101 Lahat, E, Schiffer, J, Heyman, E, Dolphin, Z, Starinski, R. Acute subdural hemorrhage: uncommon complication of vacuum extraction delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1987; 25: 255–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
102 Varner, MW. Neuropsychiatric sequelae of midforceps deliveries. Clin Perinatol 1983; 10: 455–60.Google ScholarPubMed
103 Stanley, F. Perinatal risk factors in the cerebral palsies: In: Stanley, F, Alberman, E eds, The epidemiology of the cerebral palsies, Oxford: Blackwell, 1984: 98115.Google ScholarPubMed
104 Bryce, R, Stanley, F, Blair, E. The effects of intrapartum care on the risks of impairments in childhood. In: Chalmers, I, Enkin, M, Keirse, MJNC eds, Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989: 1313–21.Google Scholar
105 Blennow, G, Svenningsen, NW, Gustafson, B, Sunden, B, Cronquist, S. Neonatal and prospective follow-up study of infants delivered by vacuum extraction (VE). Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1977; 56: 189–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
106 Bowes, WA, Bowes, C. Current role of the midforceps operation. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1980; 23: 549–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
107 Editorial. Kielland's forceps or Ventouse – a comparison. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1989; 44: 373–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
108 Healy, DL, Laufe, LE. Survey of obstetric forceps training in North America in 1981. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 151: 5458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
109 Opit, LJ, Selwood, TS. Caesarean-section rates in Australia. Med J Aust 1979; 2: 706709.Google ScholarPubMed
110 Editorial. Kielland's forceps. Br Med J 1979; 1: 362–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
111 Sennett, ES, Fallis, GB. Vacuum extraction: use in a small rural hospital. J Canad Med Assoc 1983; 129: 575–78.Google Scholar
112 Plauché, WC. Vacuum extraction – use in a community hospital setting. Obstet Gynecol 1978; 52: 289–93.Google Scholar
113 Cavenagh, AGM. Vacuum versus forceps. Lancet 1984; 1: 575.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
114 Broekhuizen, FF, Washington, JM, Johnson, F, Hamilton, PR. Vacuum extraction versus forceps delivery: indications and complications, 1979 to 1984. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 69: 338–42.Google ScholarPubMed
115 Carter, J, Gudgeon, CW. Vacuum extraction and forceps delivery in a district hospital. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 1987; 27: 117–19.Google Scholar
7
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The place of the vacuum extractor in modern obstetric practice
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

The place of the vacuum extractor in modern obstetric practice
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

The place of the vacuum extractor in modern obstetric practice
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *