Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-cf9d5c678-w9nzq Total loading time: 0.285 Render date: 2021-07-28T21:38:36.427Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Amniotic fluid volume dynamics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2008

William M Glibert
Affiliation:
University of California at San Diego, USA
Thomas R Moore
Affiliation:
University of California at San Diego, USA
Robert A Brace
Affiliation:
University of California at San Diego, USA

Extract

From the moment of implantation until delivery some 37 weeks later, the human embryo or fetus is surrounded by fluid. Initially this fluid is a transudate from maternal and embryonic tissues which provides nutrients for the growing embryo. Starting in early pregnancy, the fetal kidneys begin to contribute substantial quantities of urine to the amniotic fluid volume. At mid pregnancy, when the skin becomes keratinized, the kidneys become the main source of amniotic fluid. Fetal swallowing is the main route of amniotic fluid removal. Although fetal urine production and swallowing have been studied in both human pregnancy and animal models, the knowledge from these investigations is not sufficiently extensive to explain overall amniotic fluid volume regulation. None the less, it is clear that the amniotic fluid is in a dynamic, ever-changing state. The production rate of the fetal urine in the human fetus at term (800–1200ml/day) is sufficient to replace completely the entire amniotic volume every 12–24 hours1. While the fetus is producing large volumes of urine, the volume of amniotic fluid is normally maintained within a very narrow range. Deviations from the normal range are often associated with significant perinatal morbidity and mortality.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Rabinowitz, R, Peters, MT, Vyas, S, Campbell, S, Nicolaides, KH. Measurement of fetal urine production in normal pregnancy by real-time ultrasonography. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 1264–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Queenan, JT, Thompson, W, Whitfield, CR, Shah, SI. Amniotic fluid volumes in normal pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1972; 114: 3438.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Brace, RA, Wolf, EJ. Characterization of normal gestational changes in amniotic fluid volume. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 382–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Lind, T, Cheyne, GA. Biochemical and cytological changes in liquor amnii with advancing gestation. J Obstet Gynaecol Brit Commw 1969; 76: 673–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Gillibrand, PN. Changes in the electrolytes, urea and osmolality of the amniotic fluid with advancing pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Brit Commw 1969; 76: 898905.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Benzie, RJ, Doran, TA, Harkins, JL, Owen, VMJ, Porter, CJ. Composition of the amniotic fluid and maternal serum in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1974; 119: 798810.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Battaglia, F, Prystowsky, H, Smisson, C, Hellegers, A, Bruns, P. On the changes in total osmotic pressure and sodium and potassium concentrations of amniotic fluid during the course of human gestation. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1959; 109: 509–12.Google ScholarPubMed
8Abramovich, DR. Fetal factors influencing the volume and composition of liquor amnii. J Obstet Gynaecol 1970; 77: 865–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Parmley, TH, Seeds, AE. Fetal skin permeability to isotopic water (THO) in early pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1970; 108: 128–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Lindheimer, MD, Barron, WM, Davison, JM. Osmoregulation of thirst and vasopressin release in pregnancy. Am J Physiol 1989; 257: F15969.Google ScholarPubMed
11Schruefer, JJ, Seeds, AE, Behrman, RE, Hellegers, AE, Bruns, PD. Changes in amniotic fluid volume and total solute concentrations in the rhesus monkey following replacement with distilled water. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1972; 112: 807–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Ramsey, EM. New appraisal of an old organ: the placenta. Proc Am Philosph Soc 1969; 113: 296311.Google Scholar
13Wladimiroff, JW, Campbell, S. Fetal urine-production rates in normal and complicated pregnancy. Lancet 1974; i: 151–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Abramovich, DR, Garden, A, Jandial, L, Page, KR. Fetal swallowing and voiding in relation to hydramnios. Obstet Gynecol 1979; 54: 1520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Gresham, EL, Rankin, JHG, Makowski, G, Battaglia, FC. An evaluation of fetal renal function in a chronic sheep preparation. J Clin Invest 1972; 51: 149–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Tomada, S, Brace, RA, Longo, L. Amniotic fluid volume and fetal swallowing rate in sheep. Am J Physiol 1985; 249: R13338.Google Scholar
17Wintour, EM, Barnes, A, Brown, EH et al. Regulation of amniotic fluid volume and composition in the ovine fetus. Obstet Gynecol 1978; 52: 689–93.Google ScholarPubMed
18Alexander, DP, Nixon, DA, Widdas, WF, Wohlzogen, FX. Gestational variations in the composition of the foetal fluids and foetal urine in the sheep. J Physiol 1958; 140: 113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Mellor, DJ, Slater, JS. Daily changes in foetal urine and relationships with amniotic and allantoic fluid and maternal plasma during the last two months of pregnancy in conscious, unstressed ewes with chronically implanted catheters. J Physiol 1972; 227: 503–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20Duenhoelter, JH, Pritchard, JA. Fetal respiration: quantitative measurements of amniotic fluid inspired near term by human and rhesus fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1976; 125: 306309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21Seeds, AE. Current concepts of amniotic fluid dynamics. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980; 138: 575–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Adamson, TM, Brodecky, V, Lambert, TF, Maloney, JE, Ritchie, BC, Walker, A. The production and composition of lung liquids in the in-utero foetal lamb. In: Cross, KW ed. Foetal and neonatal physiology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973: 208–12.Google Scholar
23Mescher, EJ, Platzker, A, Ballard, PL, Kitterman, JA, Clements, JA, Tolley, WH. Ontogeny of tracheal fluid, pulmonary surfactant, and plasma corticoids in the fetal lamb. J Appl Physiol 1975; 39: 1017–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24Olver, RE, Strang, LB. Ion fluxes across the pulmonary epithelium and the secretion of lung liquid in the foetal lamb. J Physiol 1974; 241: 327–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25Lawson, EE, Brown, ER, Torday, JS, Madansky, DL, Taeasch, HW. The effect of epinephrine on tracheal fluid flow and surfactant efflux in fetal sheep. Am Rev Respir Dis 1978; 118: 1023–26.Google ScholarPubMed
26Ross, BB. Comparison of foetal pulmonary fluid with foetal plasma and amniotic fluid. Nature 1963; 199: 1100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27Patrick, J, Campbell, K, Carmichael, L, Natale, R, Richardson, B. Patterns of human fetal breathing at 30–31 and 38–39 weeks’ gestational age. Obstet Gynecol 1980; 56: 2430.Google Scholar
28Boddy, K, Dawes, GS, Patrick, JE. A 24-hour rhythm in the foetus. In: Cross, KW ed. Foetal and neonatal physiology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973: 6367.Google Scholar
29Pritchard, JA. Deglutition by normal and anencephalic fetuses. Obstet Gynecol 1965; 25: 289–97.Google ScholarPubMed
30Kitterman, JA, Ballard, PL, Clements, JA, Mescher, EJ, Tooley, WH. Tracheal fluid in fetal lambs: spontaneous decrease prior to birth. J Appl Physiol 1979; 47: 985–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31Wintour, EM, Congiu, M, Hardy, KT, Hennessy, D. Regulation of urine osmolality in fetal sheep. Q J Exp Physiol 1982; 67: 427–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32Harding, R, Bocking, AD, Sigger, JN, Wickham, PJD. Composition and volume of fluid swallowed by fetal sheep. Q J Exp Physiol 1984; 69: 487–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33Besinger, RE, Compton, AA, Hayashi, RH. The presence or absence of fetal breathing movements as a predictor of outcome in preterm labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 157: 753–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34Bradley, RM, Mistretta, CM. Swallowing in fetal sheep. Science 1973; 179: 1016–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35Sherman, DJ, Ross, MG, Day, L, Ervin, MG. Fetal swallowing: correlation of electromyography and esophageal fluid. Am J Physiol 1990; 258: R138694.Google ScholarPubMed
36Anderson, DF, Borst, HJP, Boyd, RDH, Faber, JJ. Filtration of water from mother to conceptus via paths independent of fetal placental circulation in sheep. J Physiol 1990; 431: 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37Ross, MG, Ervin, MG, Leake, RD, Oakes, G, Hobel, C, Fisher, DA. Bulk flow of amniotic fluid water in response to maternal osmotic challenge. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983; 147: 697701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38Anderson, DF, Faber, JJ, Parks, CM. Extraplacental transfer of water in the sheep. J Physiol 1988; 406: 7584.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39Woods, LL. Fetal renal contribution to amniotic fluid osmolality during maternal hypertonicity. Am J Physiol 1986; 250: R23539.Google ScholarPubMed
40Gilbert, WM, Brace, RA. Novel determination of filtration coefficient of ovine placenta and intramembranous pathway. Am J Physiol 1990; 259: R128188.Google ScholarPubMed
41Vosburgh, GJ, Flexner, LB, Cowie, DB et al. The rate of renewal in women of the water and sodium of the amniotic fluid as determined by tracer techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1948; 56: 1156–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42Gilbert, WM, Brace, RA. The missing link in amniotic fluid volume regulation: intramembranous absorption. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 74: 748–54.Google ScholarPubMed
43Abramovich, DR, Page, KR. Pathways of water transfer between liquor amnii and the fetoplacental unit at term. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1973; 3/5: 155–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44Renaud, R, Kirschtetter, L, Koehl, D. et al. Amino-acid intra-amniotic injections. In: Persianinov, LS, Chervakova, TV, Presl, J eds. Recent progress in obstetrics and gynaecology. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica, 1974: 234–56.Google Scholar
45Lloyd, JR, Clatworthy, HW. Hydramnios as aid to the early diagnosis of congenital obstruction of the alimentary tract: a study of the maternal and fetal factors. Pediatrics 1958; 23: 903909.Google Scholar
46Gilbert, WM, Cheung, CY, Brace, RA. Rapid intramembranous absorption into the fetal circulation of arginine vasopressin injected intraamniotically. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 164: 1013–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47Reynolds, WA, Pitkin, RM, Hodari, AA. Transfer of iodide into amniotic fluid by the normal and nephrectomized subhuman primate fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1969; 105: 633–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
48Minei, LJ, Suzuki, K. Role of fetal deglutition and micturition in the production and turnover of amniotic fluid in the monkey. Obstet Gynecol 1976; 48: 177–81.Google ScholarPubMed
49Tomita, H, Brace, RA, Cheung, CY, Longo, LD. Vasopressin dose-response effects on fetal vascular pressure, heart rate and blood volume. Am J Physiol 1985; 249: H97480.Google ScholarPubMed
50Stark, RI, Daniel, SS, Husain, MK, Sanocka, UM, Zubrow, AB, James, LS. Vasopressin concentration in amniotic fluid as an index of fetal hypoxia: mechanism of release in sheep. Pediatr Res 1984; 18: 552–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
51Ervin, MG, Ross, MG, Leake, RD, Fisher, D. Fetal recirculation of amniotic fluid arginine vasopressin. Am J Physiol 1986; 250: E25358.Google ScholarPubMed
52Hamamoto, K, Iwamoto, HS, Roman, CM, Benet, LZ, Rudolph, AM. Fetal uptake of intraamniotic digoxin in sheep. Pediatr Res 1990; 27: 282–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
53Makowski, EL, Meschia, G, Droegemueller, W, Battaglia, FC. Measurement of umbilical arterial blood flow to the sheep placenta and fetus in utero. Circ Res 1968; 23: 623–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
54Seeds, AE, Bissonnette, J, Lim, H, Behrman, RE. Changes in rhesus monkey fetal and maternal acid-base measurements following amniotic fluid bicarbonate or Tris infusions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1970; 107: 232–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
55Moore, TR, Longo, J, Leopold, G, Gosink, B, Cassola, G. The reliability and predictive value of an amniotic fluid scoring system in severe second trimester oligohydramnios. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 73: 739–42.Google ScholarPubMed
56Chamberlain, PF, Manning, FA, Morrison, I, Harman, CR, Lange, IR. Ultrasound evaluation of amniotic fluid volume. I: The relationship of marginal and decreased amniotic fluid volumes to perinatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 150: 245–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
57Chamberlain, PF, Manning, FA, Morrison, I, Harman, CR, Lange, IR. Ultrasound evaluation of amniotic fluid volume. II: The relationship of increased amniotic fluid volume to perinatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 150: 250–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
58Bottoms, SF, Welch, RA, Zador, IE, Sokol, RJ. Limitations of using maximum vertical pocket and other sonographic evaluation of amniotic fluid volume to predict fetal growth: technical or physiologic? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 155: 154–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
59Phelan, JP, Ohn, MO, Smith, CV, Rutherford, SE, Anderson, E. Amniotic fluid index measurements during pregnancy. J Reprod Med 1987; 32: 603604.Google ScholarPubMed
60Rutherford, SE, Phelan, JP, Smith, CV, Jacobs, N. The four quadrant assessment of amniotic fluid volume: an adjunct to antepartum fetal heart rate testing. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 70: 353–56.Google ScholarPubMed
61Moore, TR. Superiority of the four-quadrant sum over the single-deepest-pocket technique in ultrasonographic identification of abnormal amniotic fluid volumes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163: 762–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
62Moore, TR, Brace, RA. Amniotic fluid index (AFI) in the term ovine oregnancy: a predictable relationship between AFI and amniotic fluid volume. Proceedings of the thirty-fifth annual meeting of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation, Baltimore, Maryland, March 17–20, 1998: Abstract no. 286.Google Scholar
63Moore, TR, Gilbert, WM. An equation relating amniotic fluid index to amniotic fluid volume in women with polyhydramnios. Proceedings of the thirty-eighth annual meeting of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation, San Antonio, Texas, March 20–23, 1991: Abstract no. 567.Google Scholar
64Moore, TR, Cayle, JE. The amniotic fluid index in normal human pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 1168–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
65Hackett, GA, Nicolaides, KH, Campbell, S. The value of Doppler ultrasound assessment of fetal and uteroplacental circulations when severe oligohydramnios complicates the second trimester of pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 94: 1074–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
66Barss, VA, Benacerraf, BR, Frigoletto, FD. Second trimester oligohydramnios, a predictor of poor fetal outcome. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 64: 608–15.Google ScholarPubMed
67Mercer, LJ, Brown, LG. Fetal outcome with oligohydramnios in the second trimester. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 67: 840–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
68Peeters, LLH, Sheldon, RE, Jones, MD, Makowski, EL, Meschia, G. Blood flow to fetal organs as a function of arterial oxygen content. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979; 135: 637–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
69Schneider, AS, Mennuti, MT, Zackal, EH. High cesarean section rate in trisomy 18 births: a potential indication for late prenatal diagnosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981; 140: 367–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
70Leveno, KJ, Quirk, JG, Cunningham, FG, Nelson, SD, Santos-Ramos, R, Toofanian, A, DePalma, RT. Prolonged pregnancy. I: Observations concerning the causes of fetal distress. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 150: 465–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
71Miyazaki, FS, Miyazaki, BA. False reactive nonstress tests in postterm pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981; 140: 269–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
72Barkin, SZ, Pretorius, DH, Beckett, MK, Manchester, DK, Nelson, TR, Manco-Johnson, ML. Severe polyhydramnios: incidence of anomalies. AJR 1987; 148: 155–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
73Hill, LM, Breckle, R, Thomas, ML, Fries, JK. Polyhydramnios: ultrasonically detected prevalence and neonatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 69: 2125.Google ScholarPubMed
74Romero, R, Pilu, G, Jeanty, P, Ghidini, A, Hobbins, JC eds. The gastrointestinal tract and intraabdominal organs. In: Prenatal diagnosis of congenital anomalies. Norwalk, CT: Appleton and Lange, 1988: 234–36.Google ScholarPubMed
75Bovicelli, L, Rizzo, N, Orsini, LF, Pilu, G. Prenatal diagnosis and management of fetal gastrointestinal abnormalities. Semin Perinatol 1983; 7: 109–17.Google ScholarPubMed
76Chinn, DL, Filly, RA, Callen, PW. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia diagnosed prenatally by ultrasound. Radiology 1983; 148: 119–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
77Adzick, NS, Harrison, MR, Glick, PL et al. Diaphragmatic hernia in the fetus: prenatal diagnosis and outcome in 94 cases. J Pediatr Surg 1985; 20: 357–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
78Dunn, LJ, Dierker, LJ. Recurrent hydramnios in association with myotonia dystrophica. Obstet Gynecol 1973; 42: 104106.Google ScholarPubMed
79Gloster, ES, Godoy, G, Burrows, P et al. Perinatal nonimmune hydrops: diagnostic ultrasonography and related aspects of management. J Perinatol 1989; 9: 430–36.Google ScholarPubMed
80Lufkin, EG, Nelson, RL, Hill, LM, Melton III, LJ, O’Fallon, WM, Evans, AT. An analysis of diabetic pregnancies at Mayo Clinic, 1950–79. Diabetes Care 1984; 7: 539–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
81Cousins, L. Pregnancy complications among diabetic women: review 1965–1985. Obstet Gynecol Survey 1987; 42: 140–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
82Smith, FG, Lumbers, ER. Effects of maternal hyperglycemia on fetal renal function in sheep. Am J Physiol 1988; 255: R84650.Google Scholar
83Desmedt, EJ, Henry, OA, Beischer, NA. Polyhydramnios and associated maternal and fetal complications in singleton pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 97: 1115–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
84Benirschke, K. Twin placenta in perinatal mortality. NY State J Med 1961; 61: 1499–508.Google Scholar
85Wier, PE, Raten, G, Beisher, N. Acute polyhydramnios– a complication of monozygous twin pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1979; 86: 849–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
86Bebbington, MW, Wittmann, BK. Fetal transfusion syndrome: antenatal factors predicting outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 160: 913–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
87Crombleholme, TM, Harrison, MR, Golbus, MS et al. Fetal intervention in obstructive uropathy: prognostic indicators and efficacy of intervention. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 1239–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
88Goodlin, RC, Anderson, JC, Gallagher, TF. Relationship between amniotic fluid volume and maternal plasma volume expansion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983; 146: 505–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
89Kilpatrick, SJ, Safford, K, Pomeroy, T, Hoedt, L, Scheerer, L, Laros, RK. Maternal hydration affects amniotic fluid index (AFI). Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 164: 361.Google Scholar
90Wenstrom, KD, Parsons, MT. The prevention of meconium aspiration in labor using amnioinfusion. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 73: 647–51.Google ScholarPubMed
91Nageotte, FS, Freeman, RK, Garite, TJ, Dorchester, W. Prophylactic intrapartum amnioinfusion in patients with preterm rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 153: 557–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
92Matson, JR, Stokes, JB, Robillard, JE. Effects of inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis of fetal renal function. Kidney Int 1981; 20: 621–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
93Robillard, JE, Nakamura, KT. Hormonal regulation of renal function during development. Biol Neonate 1988; 53: 201–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
94Moise, KJ, Huhta, JC, Sharif, DS et al. Indomethacin in the treatment of premature labor. N Engl J Med 1988; 319: 327–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
95Gilbert, WM. Maternal, fetal and neonatal physiology in pregnancy. Current Opinion Obstet Gynecol 1990; 2: 47.Google ScholarPubMed
96De Lia, JE, Cruikshank, DP, Keye, WR. Fetoscopic neodymium: yag laser occlusion of placental vessels in severe twin–twin transfusion syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 75: 1046–53.Google ScholarPubMed
97Elliott, JP, Urig, MA, Clewell, WH. Aggressive therapeutic amniocentesis for treatment of twin–twin transfusion syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77: 537–44.Google ScholarPubMed
25
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Amniotic fluid volume dynamics
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Amniotic fluid volume dynamics
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Amniotic fluid volume dynamics
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *