Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T11:11:24.921Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Spacing and Lopping on a Mesquite (Prosopis juliflora)–Karnal Grass (Leptochloa fusca) Agroforestry System on an Alkaline Soil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

Gurbachan Singh ,
I. P. Abrol  and
S. S. Cheema
Gurbachan Singh
Affiliation:
Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal – 132 001, India
I. P. Abrol
Affiliation:
Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal – 132 001, India
S. S. Cheema
Affiliation:
Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal – 132 001, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The effects of spacing and lopping on a mesquite (Prosopis juliflora) and Karnal grass (Leptochloa fusca) agroforestry system on an alkaline soil at Karnal in India was examined over a three year period from planting. There were no significant differences in the height and diameter of the mesquite or in the number of branches at different spacings, but growth was significantly improved by lopping. The oven dried biomass obtained from lopped branches over a 40 month period was greatest at a 2 × 2 m spacing. The green forage yield of Karnal grass was greatest under mesquite spaced 4 × 4 m apart and was markedly improved under lopped mesquite. The inorganic composition of the Karnal grass, including trace elements, made it a valuable fodder in an area with an adverse alkaline soil environment. The calcium and potassium content of the grass increased and the sodium content decreased in successive cuttings. Mesquite and Karnal grass grown together reduced soil pH and EC and improved the organic carbon and available nitrogen content of the soil.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , July 1989 , pp. 401 - 408
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abrol, I. P. & Sandhu, S. S. (1981). Eucalyptus and Acacia can be grown in alkali soils. Indian Farming 31(1), 7–9.Google Scholar
Bhargava, G. P., Abrol, I. P. & Bhumbla, D. R. (1976). On the nomenclature of some salt affected soils in the Indo-Gangetic plains. Journal Indian Society Soil Science 24: 81–83.Google Scholar
Bhumbla, D. R. (1977). Alkali and saline soils of India. Proceedings Indo-Hungarian Seminar on Management of Salt Affected Soils, CSSRI, Kamal, 14–20.Google Scholar
Bhumbla, D. R., Abrol, I. P., Bhargava, G. P. & Singhla, S. K. (1972). Soils of the Experimental Farm, Karnal. Bulletin 1. Karnal: Central Soil Salinity Research Institute.Google Scholar
Grelen, H. E., Whitcakar, L. B. & Lohrey, R. E. (1972). Herbage response to precommercial thinning in direct seeded slash pine. Journal Range Management 25: 435–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grewal, S. S. & Abrol, I. P. (1986). Agroforestry on alkali soils: Effect of some management practices on initial growth, biomass accumulation and chemical composition of selected tree species. Agroforestry Systems 4: 221–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, M. L. (1973). Soil Chemical Analysis. 151–153. India: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Joshi, Y. C., Qadar, Ali, Bal, A. R. & Divdei, R. S. (1980). Selective absorption and exclusion processes of toxic ions. Annual Report, 78. Karnal: CSSRI.Google Scholar
Kaul, R. N. & Gurumurty, K. (1981). Forest for fuel planting for energy. Science Today: 43–45.Google Scholar
Kaul, R. N. & Mann, H. S. (1977). Tree planting and energy crisis: fire wood. Indian Farming 26(2): 79–81.Google Scholar
Khan, M. A. W. & Yadav, J. S. P. (1962). Characteristics and afforestation problems of saline alkali soils. Indian Forester 83: 259–271.Google Scholar
Kumar, A. & Abrol, I. P. (1983). Effect of gypsum on five tropical grasses grown in normal and extremely sodic soil. Experimental Agriculture 19: 169–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, A. & Abrol, I. P. (1984). Studies on the reclaiming effect of Karnal grass and para grass grown in a highly sodic soil. Indian Journal Agricultural Science 54: 189–193.Google Scholar
Massoumi, A. & Cornfield, A. H. (1963). A rapid method for determining sulphate in water extracts of soils. Analyst 88: 321–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raupach, M. (1967). Soil and fertilizer requirements for forests of Pinus radiata. Advances in Agronomy 19: 307–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saxena, A. K. & Singh, J. S. (1980). Analysis of forest-grazing land vegetation in parts of Kumaon Himalaya. Indian Journal Range Management 1: 13–32.Google Scholar
Singh, Gurbachan, Abrol, I. P. & Cheema, S. S. (1988). Agroforestry on alkali soils: Effect of planting methods and amendments on initial growth, biomass accumulation and chemical composition of mesquite (Prosopis juliflora (SW) DC) planted with or without Karnal grass (Diplachne fusca Linn. P. Beauv.). Agroforestry Systems 7: 103–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szabolcs, I. (1977). Salinity and alkalinity of soils, extension, classification and main properties. Proceedings Indo-Hungarian Seminar on Management of Salt Affected Soils, 20–30. Karnal: CSSRI.Google Scholar
Virginia, R. R. & Jarrel, W. M. (1983). Soil properties in a mesquite dominated sonoran desert ecosystem. Soil Science Society America Journal 47: 138–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yadav, J. S. P. (1972). Improvement of saline alkali soils through biological methods. Indian Forester 101: 385–395.Google Scholar
Yadav, J. S. P. & Singh, K. (1970). Tolerance of certain forest species to varying degree of salinity and alkali. Indian Forester 96: 587–599.Google Scholar
Yadav, J. S. P. (1980). Salt affected soils and their afforestation. Indian Forester 106: 259–272.Google Scholar