Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-888d5979f-67m56 Total loading time: 0.454 Render date: 2021-10-26T06:58:08.660Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

SOIL QUALITY INDICATORS AND CROP YIELD UNDER LONG-TERM TILLAGE SYSTEMS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 August 2016

ZHUZHU LUO
Affiliation:
Gansu Provincial Key Laboratory of Arid Land Crop Science, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, 730070, China College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, 730070, China
YANTAI GAN
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Swift Current Research and Development Centre, SK, S9H 3X2, Canada
YINING NIU*
Affiliation:
Gansu Provincial Key Laboratory of Arid Land Crop Science, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, 730070, China Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Swift Current Research and Development Centre, SK, S9H 3X2, Canada
RENZHI ZHANG
Affiliation:
Gansu Provincial Key Laboratory of Arid Land Crop Science, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, 730070, China College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, 730070, China
LINGLING LI
Affiliation:
Gansu Provincial Key Laboratory of Arid Land Crop Science, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, 730070, China
LIQUN CAI
Affiliation:
Gansu Provincial Key Laboratory of Arid Land Crop Science, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, 730070, China College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, 730070, China
JUNHONG XIE
Affiliation:
Gansu Provincial Key Laboratory of Arid Land Crop Science, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, 730070, China
*
Corresponding author. Email: niuyn@gsau.edu.cn

Summary

Soil quality indicators (SQI) can be used as a synthetic tool for the assessment of the sustainability of agricultural systems. In this study, we developed SQI using minimum data set (MDS) and determined the response of SQI to long-term tillage systems. Field pea (Pisum sativum L.) and spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) were grown in alternate years at northwestern China, and soil attributes and crop productivity were measured 6 years after the initiation of the experiment. The MDS used to develop the SQI included soil physical (aggregate, bulk density, capillary porosity, field capacity), chemical (soil organic matter, total nitrogen, available phosphorus, available potassium) and biological (microbial count, microbial biomass, and the activities of catalase, urease, alkaline phosphatase, and invertase) properties. All the property variables were measured in each of the 0–5, 5–10 and 10–30 cm depths and those variables that contributed significantly to the SQI were selected to be included in the MDS. Amongst the measured variables, bulk density and microbial counts occurred in the MDS of all the three depths, suggesting that these two properties are highly affected by the tillage treatments. In the long-term field experiment, the no-till with stubble covering the soil surface treatment received the greatest SQI score and achieved the highest crop yield. Soil quality under tillage systems can be assessed adequately using MDS measured at the top soil (0–5 cm) layer in rainfed agro-ecosystems.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, S. S. and Carroll, C. R. (2001). Designing a soil quality assessment tool for sustainable agroecosystem management. Ecological Applications 11 (6):15731585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, S. S., Karlen, D. L. and Mitchell, J. P. (2002a). A comparision of soil quality indexing methods for vegetable systems in Northern California. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment 90:2545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, S. S., Mitchell, J. P., Mancinelli, R., Larlen, D. L., Hartz, T. K., Horwarth, W. R., Pettygrove, G. S., Scow, K. M. and Munk, D. S. (2002b). On farm assessment of soil quality in California's central valley. Agronomy Journal 94:1223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandick, A. K. and Dick, R. P. (1999). Field management effects on soil enzyme activities. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 31:14711479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bao, S. D. (2000). Analysis on Soil Agricultural Chemistry, Beijing: China Agricultural Press.Google Scholar
Brejda, J. J., Karlen, D. L., Smith, J. L. and Allan, D. L. (2000a). Identification of regional soil quality factors and indicators:II. Northern Mississippi loess hills and Palouse prairie. Soil Science Society of America Journal 64:21252135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brejda, J. J., Moorman, T. B., Karlen, D. L., Smith, J. L. and Dao, T. H. (2000b). Identification of regional soil quality factors and indicators: I. Central and southern hill plains. Soil Science Society of America Journal 64:21152124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cai, L. Q., Qi, P. and Zhang, R. Z. (2008). Effects of conservation tillage measures on soil aggregates stability and soil organ ic carbon in two sequence rotation system with spring wheat and field pea. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 22 (2):141145.Google Scholar
Cannell, R. Q. and Hawes, J. D. (1994). Trends in tillage practices in relation to sustainable crop production with special reference to temperate climates. Soil & Tillage Research 30:245282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, K. Y. and Heenan, D. P. (2005). The effects of stubble burning and tillage on soil carbon sequestration and crop productivity in southeastern Australia. Soil Use and Management 21:427431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doran, J. W. and Parkin, T. B. (Eds) (1994). Defining and Assessing Soil Quality. Madison, WI: SSSA Special Publication.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enfors, E., Barron, J., Makurira, H., Rockström, J. and Tumbo, S. (2011). Yield and soil system changes from conservation tillage in dryland farming: A case study from North Eastern Tanzania. Agricultural Water Management 98 (11):16871695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreras, L. A., Costa, J. L., Garcia, F. O. and Pecorari, C. (2000). Effect of no-tillage on some soil physical properties of a structural degraded Petrocalcic Paleudoll of the southern “Pampa” of Argentina. Soil & Tillage Research 54:3139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gan, Y., Siddique, K. H. M., Turner, N. C., Li, X.-G., Niu, J.-Y., Yang, C., Liu, L. and Chai, Q. (2013). Chapter seven - ridge-furrow mulching systems—an innovative technique for boosting crop productivity in semiarid rain-fed environments. In Advances in Agronomy Vol. 118, 429476 (Ed Donald, L. S.). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Glover, J. D., Reganold, J. P. and Andrews, P. K. (2000). Systematic method for rating soil quality of conventional, organic, and integrated apple orchards in Washington State. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 80:2945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guan, S. Y. (1986). Soil Enzyme and its Research Method. Beijing: Agriculture Press.Google Scholar
Halvorson, A., Peterson, G. A. and Reule, C. A. (2002). Tillage system and crop rotation effects on dryland crop yield and soil carbon in the central Great Plains Agronomy Journal 94:14291436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, M. L. (1973). Soil Chemical Analysis. New Delhi, India: Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd.Google Scholar
Karlen, D. L., Gardner, J. C. and Rosek, M. J. (1998). A soil quality framework for evaluating the impact of CRP. Journal of Prouction Agriculture 11:5660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlen, D. L., Mausbach, M. J., Doran, J. W., Cline, R. G., Harris, R. F. and Schuman, G. E. (1997). Soil quality: A concept, definition and framework for evaluation. Soil Science Society of America Journal 61:410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlen, D. L. and Stott, D. E. (1994). A framework for evaluating physical and chemical indicators of soil quality. In Defining Soil Quality for a Sustainable Environment, 5372 (Eds Doran, J. W., Coleman, D. C., Bezdicek, D. F. and Stewart, B. A.). 677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711, USA: Soil Science Society of America, SSSA Special Publication no. 35.Google Scholar
Karlen, D. L., Wollenhaupt, N. C. and Erbach, D. C. (1994). Long-term tillage effects on soil quality. Soil & Tillage Research 32:313327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lal, R., Mahboubi, A. and Fausey, N. R. (1994). Long term tillage and rotation effects on properties of central Ohio soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 58:517522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, W. E. and Pierce, F. J. (Eds) (1994). The Dynamics of Soil Quality as a Measure of Sustainable Management. SSSA and ASA, Madison, WI: SSSA. Spec. Publ. 35.Google Scholar
Li, F. D., Yu, Z. N. and He, S. J. (1996). Experimental Technique of Agricultural Microbiology. Beijing: China Agriculture Press.Google Scholar
Li, S. Q., Li, D. F. and Li, F. M. (2003). Soil ecological effects of plastic film mulching in semiarid agro-ecological system. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Natural Science Edition) 31 (5):2129.Google Scholar
Liebig, M. A., Varvel, G. and Doran, J. (2001). A simple performance based index for assessing multiple agroecosystem functions. Agronomy Journal 93:313318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1978). Soil Physical Analysis. Beijing: Science Press.Google Scholar
Niu, Y., Zhang, R., Luo, Z., Li, L., Cai, L., Li, G. and Xie, J. (2016). Contributions of long-term tillage systems on crop production and soil properties in the semi-arid Loess Plateau of China. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 96 (8):26502659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olsen, S. R., Cole, C. V., Watanable, F. S. and Dean, L. A. (Eds) (1954). Estimation of Available Phosphorus in Soils by Extraction with Sodium Bicarbonate. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Pierce, F. J., Larson, W. E., Dowdy, R. H. and Graham, W. A. P. (1983). Productivity of soils: Assessing long-term changes due to erosion. Journal of Soil Water Conservation 38:3944.Google Scholar
Salinas-Garcia, J. R. (2001). Residue removal and tillage interaction effects on soil properties under rain-fed corn production in Central Mexico. Soil & Tillage Research 59:6779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shukla, M. K., Lal, R. and Ebinger, M. (2004). Soil quality indicators for reclaimed mine soils in southeastern Ohio. Soil Science Society of America Journal 169 (2):133141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, M. J. and Ewing, S. (Eds) (2000). Soil Quality. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Singh, K. K., Covlin, T. S., Erbach, D. C. and Mughal, A. (1992). Tilth index: An approach to quantifying soil tilth. Transactions of the ASAE 35:17771785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soon, Y. K., Clayton, G. W. and Rice, W. A. (2001). Tillage and previous crop effects on dynamics of nitrogen in a wheat-soil system. Agronomy Journal 93:842849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tracy, P. W., Westfall, D. G., Elliott, E. T., Peterson, G. A. and Cole, C. V. (1990). Carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, and sulfur mineralization in plow and no-till cultivation. Soil Science Society of America Journal 54:457461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unger, P. W. and Jones, O. R. (1998). Long-term tillage and cropping systems affect bulk density and penetration resistance of soil cropped to dryland wheat and grain sorghum. Soil & Tillage Research 45:3957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Wie, J. B., Adam, J. C. and Ullman, J. L. (2013). Conservation tillage in dryland agriculture impacts watershed hydrology. Journal of Hydrology 483 (0):2638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walkley, A. and Black, I. A. (1934). An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil science 37:2938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wander, M. M. and Bollero, G. A. (1999). Soil quality assessment of tillage impacts in Illinois. Soil Science Society of America Journal 63:961971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, X. (1994). Application of Soil Taxonomic Classification in the Evaluation of Soil Resources. Beijing (in Chinese): Science Press.Google Scholar
Wienhold, B. J., Andrews, S. S. and Karlen, D. L. (2004). Soil quality: A review of the science and experiences in the USA. Environmental Geochemistry and Health 26:8995.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yan, C. S. (1988). Soil Fertility and its Research Method. Beijing: Science Press.Google Scholar
Yang, X. M. and Wander, M. M. (1998). Temporal changes in dry aggregate size and stability: Tillage and drop effects on a silty loam Mollisoil in Illinois. Soil & Tillage Research 49:173183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, R. Z., Luo, Z. Z. and Cai, L. Q. (2011). Effects of long-term conservation tillage on soil physical quality of rainfed areas of the Loess Plateau. Acta Prataculturae Sinica 20 (4):110.Google Scholar
Zhao, L. P. and Jiang, Y. (1986). Discussion on measurements of soil phosphates. Chinese Journal of Soil Science 17 (3):138141.Google Scholar
Zornoza, R., Mataix-Solera, J., Guerrero, C., Arcenegui, V., Mataix-Beneyto, J. and Go´ mez, I. (2008). Validating the effectiveness and sensitivity of two soil quality indices based on natural forest soils under Mediterranean conditions. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 40:20792087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Luo supplementary material

Supplementary Table

Download Luo supplementary material(File)
File 36 KB
6
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

SOIL QUALITY INDICATORS AND CROP YIELD UNDER LONG-TERM TILLAGE SYSTEMS
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

SOIL QUALITY INDICATORS AND CROP YIELD UNDER LONG-TERM TILLAGE SYSTEMS
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

SOIL QUALITY INDICATORS AND CROP YIELD UNDER LONG-TERM TILLAGE SYSTEMS
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *