Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-564cf476b6-qq8pn Total loading time: 0.366 Render date: 2021-06-22T00:14:12.436Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

RELIABILITY OF NDVI DERIVED BY HIGH RESOLUTION SATELLITE AND UAV COMPARED TO IN-FIELD METHODS FOR THE EVALUATION OF EARLY CROP N STATUS AND GRAIN YIELD IN WHEAT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2017

PAOLO BENINCASA
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, Borgo XX Giugno, 74, 06121, Perugia, Italy
SARA ANTOGNELLI
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, Borgo XX Giugno, 74, 06121, Perugia, Italy
LUCA BRUNETTI
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, Borgo XX Giugno, 74, 06121, Perugia, Italy
CARLO ALBERTO FABBRI
Affiliation:
TeamDev – Software, GIS and Web Engineering – Via Tiberina, 70, 06050, Perugia, Collepepe di Collazzone, Italy
ANTONIO NATALE
Affiliation:
TeamDev – Software, GIS and Web Engineering – Via Tiberina, 70, 06050, Perugia, Collepepe di Collazzone, Italy
VELIA SARTORETTI
Affiliation:
TeamDev – Software, GIS and Web Engineering – Via Tiberina, 70, 06050, Perugia, Collepepe di Collazzone, Italy
GIANLUCA MODEO
Affiliation:
TeamDev – Software, GIS and Web Engineering – Via Tiberina, 70, 06050, Perugia, Collepepe di Collazzone, Italy
MARCELLO GUIDUCCI
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, Borgo XX Giugno, 74, 06121, Perugia, Italy
FRANCESCO TEI
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, Borgo XX Giugno, 74, 06121, Perugia, Italy
MARCO VIZZARI
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, Borgo XX Giugno, 74, 06121, Perugia, Italy
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Summary

This study was aimed at comparing in-field parameters and remote sensing NDVI (normalized difference vegetation index) by both satellite (SAT) and unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) for the assessment of early nitrogen (N) status and prediction of yield in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Six increasing N rates, i.e., 0, 40, 80, 120, 160, 200 kg N ha−1 were applied, half at tillering and half at shooting. Thus, when the crop N status was monitored between the two N applications, consecutive N treatments differentiated from each other by just 20 kg N ha−1. The following in-field and remote sensed parameters were compared as indicators of crop vegetative and N status: plant N% (w:w) concentration; crop N uptake (Nupt); ratio between transmitted and incident photosynthetically active radiation (PARt/PARi); leaf SPAD values, an indirect index for chlorophyll content; SAT and UAV derived NDVI. As reliable indicators of wheat N availability, in-field parameters were ranked as follows: PARt/PARi ≅ Nupt > SPAD ≅ N%. The PARt/PARi, Nupt and SPAD resulted quite strongly correlated to each other. At all crop stages, the NDVI was strongly correlated with PARt/PARi and Nupt. It is of relevance that NDVI correlated quite strongly to in-field parameters and grain yield at shooting, i.e., before the second N application, when the N rate can still be adjusted. The SAT and UAV NDVIs were strongly correlated to each other, which means they can be used alternatively depending on the context.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Basso, B., Ritchie, J. T., Pierce, F. J., Braga, R. P. and Jones, J. W. (2001). Spatial validation of crop models for precision agriculture. Agricultural Systems 68:97112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benincasa, P., Farneselli, M., Tosti, G., Bonciarelli, U., Lorenzetti, M. C. and Guiducci, M. (2016). Eleven-year results on soft and durum wheat crops grown in an organic and in a conventional low input cropping system. Italian Journal of Agronomy 11:7784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonciarelli, U., Onofri, A., Benincasa, P., Farneselli, M., Guiducci, M., Pannacci, E., Tosti, G. and Tei, F. (2016). Long-term evaluation of productivity, stability and sustainability for cropping systems in Mediterranean rainfed conditions. European Journal of Agronomy 77:146155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bongiovanni, R. and Lowenberg-Deboer, J. (2004). Precision agriculture and sustainability. Precision Agriculture 5:359387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bora, G. C., Nowatzki, J. F. and Roberts, D. C. (2012). Energy savings by adopting precision agriculture in rural USA. Energy, Sustainability and Society 2:1, 22, 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouvet, M. (2014). Radiometric comparison of multispectral imagers over a pseudo-invariant calibration site using a reference radiometric model. Remote Sensing of Environment 140:141154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J. B. and Wayne, R. H. (2011). Introduction to Remote Sensing (5th ed). New York: The Guildford Press.Google Scholar
Candiago, S., Remondino, F., De Giglio, M., Dubbini, M. and Gattelli, M. (2015). Evaluating multispectral images and vegetation indices for precision farming applications from UAV images. Remote Sensing. 7:40264047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, Q., Miao, Y., Feng, G., Gao, X., Li, F., Liu, B., Yue, S., Cheng, S., Ustin, S. L. and Khosla, R. (2015). Active canopy sensing of winter wheat nitrogen status: An evaluation of two sensor systems. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 112:5467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, T. and Ripley, D. A. (1997). On the relation between NDVI, fractional vegetation cover, and leaf area index. Remote Sensing of Environment 62:241252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casa, R. and Castrignanò, A. (2008). Analysis of spatial relationships between soil and crop variables in a durum wheat field using a multivariate geostatistical approach. European Journal of Agronomy 28:331342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De la Casa, A. C. and Ovando, G. G. (2013). Estimation of Wheat Area in Córdoba, Argentina, with Multitemporal NDVI Data of SPOT-Vegetation. International Journal of Geosciences 4:13551364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eitel, J. U. H., Vierling, L. A., Long, D. S. and Hunt, E. R. (2011). Early season remote sensing of wheat nitrogen status using a green scanning laser. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 151:13381345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadjimitsis, D. G., Clayton, C. R. I. and Retalis, A. (2009). The use of selected pseudo-invariant targets for the application of atmospheric correction in multi-temporal studies using satellite remotely sensed imagery. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 11:192200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, P. M. and Schjoerring, J. K. (2003). Reflectance measurement of canopy biomass and nitrogen status in wheat crops using normalized difference vegetation indices and partial least squares regression. Remote Sensing of Environment 86:542553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoel, B. O. and Solhaug, K. A. (1998). Effect of irradiance on chlorophyll estimation with the Minolta SPAD-502 leaf cholorophyll meter. Annals of Botany 82:389392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honkavaara, E., Hakala, T., Markelin, L. and Peltoniemi, J. (2014). Metrology of image processing in spectral reflectance measurement by UAV. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 40:5358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huete, A. R., Liu, H. Q., Batchily, K. and van Leeuwen, W. (1997). A comparsion of vegetation indices over a Global set of TM images for EO -MODIS. Remote Sensing of Environment 59:440451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jia, L., Yu, Z., Li, F., Gnyp, M., Koppe, W., Bareth, G., Miao, Y., Chen, X. and Zhang, F. (2012). Nitrogen Status Estimation of Winter Wheat by Using an IKONOS Satellite Image in the North China Plain. Computer and Computing Technologies in Agriculture 369:174184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lelong, C. C. D., Burger, P., Jubelin, G., Roux, B., Labbé, S. and Baret, F. (2008). Assessment of unmanned aerial vehicles imagery for quantitative monitoring of wheat crop in small plots. Sensors 8:35573585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maresma, Á., Ariza, M., Martínez, E., Lloveras, J. and Martínez-Casasnovas, J. (2016). Analysis of Vegetation Indices to Determine Nitrogen Application and Yield Prediction in Maize (Zea mays L.) from a Standard UAV Service. Remote Sensing 8:973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monsi, M. and Saeki, T. (1953). The light factor in plant communities and its significance for dry matter production. Japanese Journal of Botany 14:2252.Google Scholar
Muñoz-Huerta, R. F., Guevara-Gonzalez, R. G., Contreras-Medina, L. M., Torres-Pacheco, I., Prado-Olivarez, J. and Ocampo-Velazquez, R. V. (2013). A review of methods for sensing the nitrogen status in plants: Advantages, disadvantages and recent advances. Sensors 13:1082310843.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perry, E., Morse-Mcnabb, E., Nuttall, J., O'Leary, G. and Clark, R. (2013). Managing wheat from space: Linking MODIS NDVI and crop models for Australian dryland wheat. International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium 7:32433245.Google Scholar
QGIS Development Team (2014). No Title. QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project. Available at: http://qgis.osgeo.org.Google Scholar
Quebrajo, L., Pérez-Ruiz, M., Rodriguez-Lizana, A. and Agüera, J. (2015). An Approach to Precise Nitrogen Management Using Hand-Held Crop Sensor Measurements and Winter Wheat Yield Mapping in a Mediterranean Environment. Sensors 15:55045517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raun, W. R., Solie, J. B., Johnson G, V.., Stone, M. L., Lukina, E. V., Thomason, W. E. and Schepers, J. S. (2001). In-season prediction of potential grain yield in winter wheat using canopy reflectance. Agronomy Journal 93:131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ren, J., Chen, Z., Zhou, Q. and Tang, H. (2008). Regional yield estimation for winter wheat with MODIS-NDVI data in Shandong, China. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 10:403410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saberioon, M. M., Amin, M. S. M., Anuar, A. R., Gholizadeh, A., Wayayok, A. and Khairunniza-Bejo, S. (2014). Assessment of rice leaf chlorophyll content using visible bands at different growth stages at both the leaf and canopy scale. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 32:3545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sultana, S. R., Ali, A., Ahmad, A., Mubeen, M., Ahmad, S., Ercisli, S. and Jaafar, H. Z. E. (2014). Normalized Difference vegetation index as a tool for wheat yield estimation: A case study from Faisalabad, Pakistan. The Scientific World Journal 2014, ID 725326, 8 p.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tei, F., Benincasa, P. and Guiducci, M. (2003). Critical nitrogen concentration in lettuce. Acta Horticulturae 627:227232.Google Scholar
Thenkabail, P. S., Smith, R. B. and De Pauw, E. (2000). Hyperspectral vegetation indices and their relationships with agricultural crop characteristics. Remote Sensing of Environment 71:158182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilling, A. K., O'Leary, G. J., Ferwerda, J. G., Jones, S. D., Fitzgerald, G. J., Rodriguez, D. and Belford, R. (2007). Remote sensing of nitrogen and water stress in wheat. Field Crops Research 104:7785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torres-Sánchez, J., Peña, J. M., de Castro, A. I. and López-Granados, F. (2014). Multi-temporal mapping of the vegetation fraction in early-season wheat fields using images from UAV. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 103:104113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulissi, V., Antonucci, F., Benincasa, P., Farneselli, M., Tosti, G., Guiducci, M., Tei, F., Costa, C., Pallottino, F. and Menesatti, P. (2011). Nitrogen content estimation on tomato leaves by VIS-NIR non-destructive spectral reflectance system. Sensors 11:64116424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermote, E. F., Tanre, D., Deuze, J. L., Herman, M. and Morcrette, J. J. (1997). Second simulation of the satellite signal in the solar spectrum, 6S: An overview. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 35:675686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, B., Gommes, R., Zhang, M., Zeng, H., Yan, N., Zou, W., Zheng, Y., Zhang, N., Chang, S., Xing, Q. and van Heijden, A. (2015). Global Crop Monitoring: A Satellite-Based Hierarchical Approach. Remote Sensing 7: 39073933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, W., Tang, L., Yang, X., Liu, L., Cao, W. and Zhu, Y. (2015). A simulation model for predicting canopy structure and light distribution in wheat. European Journal of Agronomy 67:111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Benincasa supplementary material

Benincasa supplementary material

Download Benincasa supplementary material(File)
File 548 KB
16
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

RELIABILITY OF NDVI DERIVED BY HIGH RESOLUTION SATELLITE AND UAV COMPARED TO IN-FIELD METHODS FOR THE EVALUATION OF EARLY CROP N STATUS AND GRAIN YIELD IN WHEAT
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

RELIABILITY OF NDVI DERIVED BY HIGH RESOLUTION SATELLITE AND UAV COMPARED TO IN-FIELD METHODS FOR THE EVALUATION OF EARLY CROP N STATUS AND GRAIN YIELD IN WHEAT
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

RELIABILITY OF NDVI DERIVED BY HIGH RESOLUTION SATELLITE AND UAV COMPARED TO IN-FIELD METHODS FOR THE EVALUATION OF EARLY CROP N STATUS AND GRAIN YIELD IN WHEAT
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *