Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-29T04:01:15.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false


Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2016

Laboratory of Root Layer Control, College of Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, 510642, Guangzhou, China
Laboratory of Root Layer Control, College of Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, 510642, Guangzhou, China
Laboratory of Root Layer Control, College of Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, 510642, Guangzhou, China
Laboratory of Root Layer Control, College of Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, 510642, Guangzhou, China
China Tobacco Hunan Industrial Co. Ltd., 10007, Changsha, China
China Tobacco Hunan Industrial Co. Ltd., 10007, Changsha, China
§Corresponding author. Email:;
§Corresponding author. Email:;


In this study, the effects of HA combined with NPK fertilizer (HANPK) on root growth and leaf quality of tobacco plants were investigated in tobacco fields. Results indicated that the application of HA alone did not enhance the growth of tobacco obviously, while HANPK increased tobacco biomass by 36.9% and stimulated the growth of lateral roots significantly. The number of the second-order lateral roots was increased by 89.3% compared with the control. Furthermore, HANPK raised the ratio of root biomass in 0–20 cm soil layer over the whole soil layer and increased the proportion of fine roots over the total roots. Tobacco leaf yield, output value, and benefit of HANPK were 12.2%, 29.4% and 35.5% higher than those of the control, respectively. The above results suggest that the combined application of HA and NPK chemical fertilizer is an economical pattern for improving tobacco growth.

Research Article
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)



Adani, F., Genevini, P., Zaccheo, P. and Zocchi, G. (1998). The effect of commercial humic acid on tomato plant growth and mineral nutrition. Journal of Plant Nutrition 21:561575.Google Scholar
Bama, K. S. and Selvakumari, G. (2009). Effect of humic acid and fertilizers on root characteristics of rice. Advance in Plant Science 22:505506.Google Scholar
Bao, S. D. (2000). Soil and Agricultural Chemistry Analysis. (in Chinese). Beijing: Chinese Agriculture Press.Google Scholar
Bernal, M. P., Alburquerque, J. A. and Moral, R. (2009). Composting of animal manures and chemical criteria for compost maturity assessment. A review. Bioresource Technology 100:54445453.Google Scholar
Bidegain, R. A., Kaemmerer, M., Guiresse, M., Hafidi, M., Rey, F., Morard, P. and Revel, J. C. (2000). Effect of humic substances from composted or chemical decomposed poplar sawdust on mineral nutrition of ryegrass. Journal of Agricultural Science 134:259267.Google Scholar
Canellas, L. P., Olivares, F. L., Okorokovha-Facanha, A. I. and Facanha, A. R. (2002). Humic acids isolated from earthworm compost enhance root elongation, lateral root emergence and plasma membrane H+-ATPase activity in maize root. Plant Physiology 130:19511957.Google Scholar
Casimiro, I., Marchant, A., Bhalerao, R. P., Beeckman, T., Dhooge, S., Swarup, R., Graham, N., Inzé, D., Sandberg, G., Casero, P. J. and Bennett, M. (2001). Auxin transport promotes Arabidopsis lateral root initiation. The Plant Cell 13:843852.Google Scholar
Chen, Y., De Nobili, M. and Aviad, T. (2004). Stimulatory effects of humic substances on plant growth. Soil Organic Matterin Sustainable Agriculture, 103129. BocaRaton, Florida: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Cimrin, K. M. and Yilmaz, I. (2005). Humic acid applications to lettuce do not improve yield but do improve phosphorus availability. Acta Agriculturae. Scandinavica Section B-Soil and Plant Science 55:5863.Google Scholar
Daur, I. and Bakhashwain, A. A. (2013). Effect of humic acid on growth and quality of maize fodder production. Pakistan Journal of Botany 45:2125.Google Scholar
Dobbss, L. B., Canellas, L. P., Olivares, F. L., Aguiar, N. O., Pereira, L. E., Azevedo, M., Spaccini, R., Piccolo, A. and Facanha, A. R. (2010). Bioactivity of chemically transformed humic matter from vermicompost on plant root growth. Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry 58:36813688.Google Scholar
Du, Z. Y., Wang, Q. H., Liu, F. C., Ma, H. L., Ma, B. Y. and Malhi, S. S. (2013). Movement of phosphorus in a calcareous soil as affected by humic acid. Pedosphere 23:229235.Google Scholar
Fagbenro, J. A. and Agboola, A. A. (1999). Effect of aerial oxidation pretreatment on composition and effectiveness f a Nigerian lignite sample as soil organic matter amendment. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 30:23312344.Google Scholar
Hartwigsen, J. A., and Evans, M. R. (2000). Humic acid seed and substrate treatments promote seedling root development. Hortscience 35(7):12311233.Google Scholar
Hartz, T. K. and Bottoms, T. G. (2010). Humic substances generally ineffective in improving vegetable crop nutrient uptake or productivity. Hortscience 45:906910.Google Scholar
Jindo, K., Martim, S. A., Navarro, E. C., Perez-alfocea, F., Hernandez, T., Garcia, C., Aguiar, N. O. and Canellas, L. P. (2012). Root growth promotion by humic acids from composted and non-composted urban organic wastes. Plant and Soil 353:209220.Google Scholar
Lomax, T. L., Muday, G. K. and Rubery, P. H. (1995). Auxin transport. Davies P J. Plant Hormones: Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 509530. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Mora, V., Bacaicoa, E., Zamarreno, A., Aguirre, E., Garnica, M., Fuentes, M. and Garcia-Mina, J. (2010). Action of humic acid on promotion of cucumber shoot growth involves nitrate-related changes associated with the root-to-shoot distribution of cytokinins, polyamines and mineral nutrients. Journal of Plant Physiology 167:633642.Google Scholar
Mora, V., Baigorri, R., Bacaicoa, E., Zamarreño, A. M. and García-Mina, J. (2012). The humic acid-induced changes in the root concentration of nitric oxide, IAA and ethylene do not explain the changes in root architecture caused by humic acid in cucumber. Environmental and Experimental of Botany 76:2432.Google Scholar
Nardi, S., Pizzeghello, D., Muscolo, A. and Vianello, A. (2002). Physiological effects of humic substances on higher plants. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 34:15271536.Google Scholar
Philippe, M., Boris, E. and Marie, M. (2010). Direct effects of humic-like substance on growth, water, and mineral nutrition of various species. Journal of Plant Nutrition 34:4659.Google Scholar
Pinton, R., Cesco, S., Lacoletig, G., Astolfi, S. and Varanini, Z. (1999). Modulation of NO3 uptake by water-extractable humic substances : Involvement of root plasma membrane H+-ATPase. Plant and Soil 215:155161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quaggiotti, S., Ruperti, B., Pizzeghello, D., Francioso, O., Tugnoli, V. and Nardi, S. (2004). Effect of low molecular size humic substances on nitrate uptake and expression of genes involved in nitrate transport in maize (Zea mays L.). Journal of Experimental Botany 55:803813.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, W., Santi, S., Pinton, R. and Varanini, Z. (2007). Water-extractable humic substances alter root development and epidermal cell pattern in Arabidopsis . Plant and Soil 300:259267.Google Scholar
Tahir, M. M., Khurshid, M., Khan, M. Z., Abbasi, M. K. and Kazmi, M. H. (2011). Lignite-derived humic acid effect on growth of wheat plants in different soils. Pedosphere 21:124131.Google Scholar
Trevisan, S., Pizzeghello, D., Ruperti, B., Francioso, O., Sassi, A., Palme, K., Quaggiotti, S. and Nardi, S. (2010). Humic substances induce lateral root formation and expression of the early auxin-responsive IAA19 gene and DR4 synthetic element in Arabidopsis . Plant Biology 12(4):604614.Google Scholar
Turgay, O. C., Karaca, A., Unver, S. and Tamer, N. (2011). Effects of coal-derived humic substance on some soil properties and bread wheat yield. Communication in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 42:10501070.Google Scholar
Unlu, H., Unlu, H. O. and Karakurt, Y. (2010). Influence of humic acid on the antioxidant compounds in pepper fruit. Journal of Food Agricultural Environment 8:434438.Google Scholar
Wang, R. X. (2003). Tobacco Chemistry. (in Chinese). Beijing: Chinese Agriculture Press.Google Scholar
Xu, Z. C., Li, Y. Y. and Xiao, H. Q. (2008). Evaluation of ecological factors and flue-cured tobacco quality in tobacco-growing areas in southern Hunan, China. Journal of Plant Ecology 32:226234.Google Scholar
Zandonadi, D. B., Canellas, L. P. and Facanha, A. R. (2007). Indolacetic and humic acids induce lateral root development through a concerted plasmalemma and tonoplast H+ pumps activation. Planta 225(6):15831595.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. X., Zhou, J., Zhao, Y. G., Zhai, Y. Y., Wang, K.; Alva, A.K. and Paramasivam, S. (2013). Optimal combination of chemical compound fertilizer and humic acid to improve soil and leaf properties, yield and quality of apple (malus domestica) in the loess plateau of China. Pakistan Journal of Botany 45:13151320.Google Scholar
Zhou, D., Yin, K. and Xu, Z. (2003). Effect of polar auxin transport on rice root development. Acta of Botanica Sinica 45(12):14211427.Google Scholar
Zhou, Q. I. (1995). Experiment Guide of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. (in Chinese). Beijing: China Agricultural Press.Google Scholar