Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T09:56:17.143Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

P-348 - Importance of Multidimensional Assessment to Refine Subtypes of Developmental Coordination Disorder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

L. Vaivre-Douret
Affiliation:
INSERM UMR 669, Université Paris Sud and Université Descartes Université Paris Descartes
C. Lalanne
Affiliation:
INSERM UMR 669, Université Paris Sud and Université Descartes
D. Cabrol
Affiliation:
AP-HP Port Royal-Cochin Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
B. Golse
Affiliation:
AP-HP Necker-Enfants Malades, Child Psychiatry Department and Port Royal-Cochin, Paris, France
B. Falissard
Affiliation:
INSERM UMR 669, Université Paris Sud and Université Descartes

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objectives:

The DSM-IV-TR criteria for Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) involve a marked impairment in the development of motor coordination although visuo-spatial, digital and visuo-motor perception, neuromuscular tone, qualitative and quantitative measures of gross and fine motor coordination related impairments might be used to isolate three main subtypes of DCD/dyspraxia: ideo-motor, visuo-spatial and constructional, and a mix group sharing common impairments with additional comorbidities. This study focus on isolating specific markers of coordination disorder and their interactions in mix vs. pure form of dyspraxia.

Methods:

Tree-based bagged classifiers were used to highlight relevant markers among 49 pass/fail tests that best discriminate two clinical subgroups based on a sample (N = 63) of 5–15 years old children having IQ in the expected range (40% mix dyspraxia). Model calibration was done on a training sample through nested repeated 5-fold cross-validation while predictive performance were assessed on a held-out validation sample, using a split ratio of 0.7/0.3.

Results:

We found that digital praxia, imitation of gestures, manual dexterity, digital perception, lego blocks, and visual motor integration were among the top most important impairments when predicting subtypes. Specific interactions among those predictors and other impairments (motor pathway, visual evoked potential, language) were shown to provide additional insights into DCD subtyping.

Conclusions:

Taylored follow-up of patients presenting with DCD should consider the specificity of visuo-spatial, neuromotor and neuropsychological impairments whose co-occurrence allow to define different subtypes of DCD.

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2012
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.