Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T17:08:53.801Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

P01-254 - Living with Tics: Development and Pilot Examination of a Psychosical Treatment to Improve Resilience and Coping in Youth with Tics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2020

E. Storch
Affiliation:
University of South Florida, St. Petersburg, FL
N. Caporino
Affiliation:
University of South Florida, St. Petersburg, FL
J. Morgan
Affiliation:
University of South Florida, St. Petersburg, FL
J. Piacentini
Affiliation:
UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
T. Murphy
Affiliation:
University of South Florida, St. Petersburg, FL

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objectives

Many youth with tics experience distress about having tics and how others may perceive them. Such symptoms are often more impairing and distressing than are the tics and negatively impact self-concept, functioning, and quality of life. Although treatments exist that target the frequency and severity of tics, no intervention has been developed that helps youth with tics cope with their condition and limit associated functional impairment and distress. Given this, we developed a cognitive-behaviorally oriented psychotherapy protocol that promotes adaptive coping and resiliency among youth with tics in addressing varied issues commonly experienced by this population. This poster reports data from the Phase I component of this study.

Method

Phase I concentrated on developing the treatment protocol through expert opinion coupled with focus groups with parents and children with a tic disorder. Based on this, we developed a preliminary manual and piloted it in 6 youth with tics who met relevant inclusion/exclusion criteria. Phase II involves a preliminary test of the protocol in that focuses primarily on feasibility issues. All subjects participated in assessments (Screening, Baseline, Post-treatment) conducted by a blinded independent evaluator.

Results

Only Phase I data will be presented as Phase II is ongoing. Descriptive statistics related to improvement rates; tic severity; child self-esteem and self-efficacy; and child internalizing symptoms will be reported. Qualitative data from the focus groups will also be presented regarding domains of impairment for youth with tics.

Conclusions

This treatment shows early promise of helping youth with tics cope with their condition.

Type
Child and adolescent psychiatry
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2010
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.