Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T14:28:35.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The costs and effectiveness of two psychosocial treatment programmes for personality disorder: a controlled study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

Jennifer Beecham*
Affiliation:
PSSRU, Cornwallis Building, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NF, UK CEMH, Institute of Psychiatry, UK
Michelle Sleed
Affiliation:
PSSRU, Cornwallis Building, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NF, UK
Martin Knapp
Affiliation:
CEMH, Institute of Psychiatry, UK PSSRU, London School of Economics, London, UK
Marco Chiesa
Affiliation:
Cassel Hospital, UK
Carla Drahorad
Affiliation:
Cassel Hospital, UK
*
*Corresponding author. Tel.: +44 1227 82 3792; fax: +44 1227 82 7038. E-mail address:J.K.Beecham@kent.ac.uk (J. Beecham).
Get access

Abstract

This paper examines the costs and cost-effectiveness of psychosocial treatment for personality disorder in a controlled study. Using well-validated cost and outcome measures three groups are compared: the One-Stage group (n = 32) received 12 months of inpatient treatment; the Step-Down group (n = 29) received 6 months of inpatient treatment followed by 12 months of outpatient therapy; and the control group of 47 people used routinely available services. Both specialist programmes were more effective than routine psychiatric services but more costly. Using an extended dominance approach the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio showed that achieving one extra person with clinically relevant outcomes required an investment in the Step-Down programme of around £3400 over 18 months. Small sample sizes and non-random allocation to programmes are limitations of this study but the costs and effectiveness findings consistently point to advantages for the shorter residential programme followed by community-based psychotherapeutic support.

Type
Original article
Copyright
Copyright © Elsevier SAS 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, C.Beecham, J.Costing services: ideals and reality. In: Netten, A.Beecham, J., editors. Costing community care: theory and practice. Ashgate: Aldershot; 1993. p. 2440.Google Scholar
Bateman, A.Fonagy, P.Treatment of borderline personality disorder with psychoanalytically oriented partial hospitalisation: an 18-month follow-up. Am. J. Psych. 2001;158:3642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateman, A.Fonagy, P.Health service utilization costs for borderline personality disorder patients treated with psychoanalytically oriented partial hospitalization versus general psychiatric care. Am. J. Psych. 2003;160:169171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beecham, J.Knapp, M.Costing psychiatric interventions. In: Thornicroft, G.Brewin, C.Wing, J., editors. Measuring mental health needs. London: Gaskell; 1992. p.; 2001. p. 179190 (Second edition).Google Scholar
Bender, D.Dolan, R.Sanislow, C.Dyke, I.McGlashan, T.Shea, M.et al.Treatment utilization by patients with personality disorders. Am. J. Psych. 2001;158:295302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chiesa, M.Fonagy, P.Cassel Personality Disorder Study: methodology and treatment effects. Br. J. Psych. 2000;176:485491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chiesa, M.Fonagy, P.Psychosocial treatment for severe personality disorder: 36-month follow-up. Br. J. Psych. 2003;183:356362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chiesa, M.Fonagy, P.Holmes, J.Drahorad, C.Residential versus community treatment of personality disorder: a comparative study of three treatment programs. Am. J. Psych. 2004;161:14631470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chiesa, M.Iacoponi, E.Morris, M.Changes in health service utilization by patients with severe personality disorders before and after in-patient psychosocial treatment. Br. J. Psychoth. 1996;12:501512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das Gupta, R.Guest, J.F.Annual cost of bipolar disorder to UK society. Br. Jour. Psych. 2002;180:227233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Derogatis, L.SCL-90-R: administration, scoring procedures. Manual-II. Towson, MD: Clinical Psychometric Research; 1983.Google Scholar
Endicott, J.Spitzer, R.Fleiss, J.Cohen, J.The Global Assessment Scale. Arch. Gen. Psych. 1976;33:766771.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hyler, S.Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4. New York: New York State Psychiatric Institute; 1994.Google Scholar
Jacobson, N.Truax, P.Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. J. Cons. Clin. Psychology. 1991;59:1219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johannesson, M.Weinstein, C.On the decision rules of cost-effectiveness analysis. J. Health Econs. 1993;12:459467.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kent, S.Fogarty, M.Yellowlees, P.Heavy utilization of inpatient and outpatient services in a public mental health service. Psych. Servs. 1995;46:12541257.Google Scholar
Knapp, M.Beecham, J.Reduced-list costings: examination of an informed short cut in mental health research. Health Econs. 1993;2:313322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Netten, A.Dennett, J.Knight, J.Unit Costs of Health and Social Care, 1999. Canterbury: PSSRU: University of Kent; 1999.Google Scholar
NIMHE. Personality Disorder: No Longer a Diagnosis of Exclusion. London: National Institute of Mental Health for England; 2003.Google Scholar
Rendu, A.Moran, P.Patel, A.Knapp, M.Mann, A.Economic impact of personality disorders in UK primary care attenders. Br. J. Psych. 2002;181:6266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spitzer, R.Williams, J.Gibbon, M.First, M.Structured clinical interview for DSM-III-R. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press; 1990.Google Scholar
Smith, K.Shar, A.Wright, K.Lewis, G.The prevalence and costs of psychiatric disorders and learning disabilities. Br. J. Psych. 1995;166:916.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, C.Morris, S.Cost of depression among adults in England in 2000. Br. J. Psych. 2003;183:514519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.