Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T18:49:29.996Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Correlation between the Wender-Utah rating scale and impulsivity, personality, anxiety and depression psychometric scales

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

R. Rodriguez-Jimenez
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
G. Ponce
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
P. Carretero
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
M. Aragues
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
A. Bagney
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
C. Muñoz-Ruiperez
Affiliation:
Department of Occupational Health, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
M.A. Jimenez-Arriero
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background and aims:

The Wender-Utah Rating Scale (WURS) was developed for the retrospective diagnosis of childhood attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). It consists of a list of childhood behaviours and symptoms suggestive of ADHD. Our objective was to study correlations of WURS scores with different impulsivity, personality, anxiety and depression psychometric scales.

Methods:

A group of 110 healthy university students were evaluated using the WURS. Four subjects scored higher than the cut-off value of 37 (compatible with childhood ADHD) and were excluded. The Barratt Impulsivity Scale (BIS-11), the Big Five Questionarie (BFQ), the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) were administered. Partial bivariate correlation analyses were performed.

Results:

WURS scores were correlated with total scores on the BIS-11 (r=0.430; p<0.001), as well as with the motor (r=0.410; p<0.001), attentional (r=0.328; p=0.001), and improvisation subscales (r=0.289; p=0.003). Regarding the BFQ, a correlation was found between WURS scores and the “emotional stability” factor (r=-0.379; p<0.001) as well as with the subfactors “emotion control” (r=-0.310; p=0.001) and “impulse control” (r=-0.354; p<0.001). Finally, significant correlations were also found between WURS scores and scores on the STAI-trait (r=0.366; p<0.001), STAI-state (r=0.200; p=0.039), and the BDI (r=0.350; p<0.001).

Conclusions:

Correlations between the WURS and other impulsivity-related psychometric scales such as the BIS-11, or the “emotional stability” factor and the “emotion control” and “impulse control” subfactors of the BFQ, provides evidence for the concurrent validity of the WURS. The correlation of this instrument with anxiety and depression scales points to possible clinical implications.

Type
Poster Session 2: Anxiety, Stress Related, Impulse and Somatoform Disorders
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2007
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.