Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T17:17:03.374Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Collaborative development of course feedback with students for psyched up. Put more in, get more out

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2021

L. Zac-Williams*
Affiliation:
Gkt School Of Medical Education, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
S. Kohara
Affiliation:
Gkt School Of Medical Education, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
A. Canon
Affiliation:
Lambeth Child And Adolescent Mental Health Services, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
C. Saunders
Affiliation:
Lishman Unit, Bethlem Royal Hospital, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
S. Zhang
Affiliation:
Service For Complex Autism And Associated Neurodevelopmental Disorders, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

PsychED Up is an extra-curricular course for 3rd year medical students at King’s College London delivered by psychiatry trainees, senior students and actors. It focuses on the hidden medical curriculum, exploration of holistic care and communication skills.

Objectives

Develop a responsive and sustainable template for course evaluation Obtain rich and specific feedback across multiple domains which can be translated into course improvements Work collaboratively with former students Empower current students with the knowledge that their input is valuable

Methods

Embedded evaluation in start of term course development sessions to engage faculty in evaluation processes Faculty survey to determine what student feedback would be most useful Questionnaire finalised Collaborative design and refinement of questions, confirmed sub-sections and scope

Results

Revised questionnaire: - Included rationale at the start - Questions tailored to faculty development needs - Greater quantity of prompted questions - Specific questions for large group presentation, small group teaching, actors’ performances and students’ reflections - Quantitative ratings and open-space questions thoughtfully paired Reduced time between sessions and obtainment of feedback Quality and quantity of feedback: - High response rates: 32/30 (2 duplicates) mid-term, 29/30 end-of-term - High-quality filling of open-space feedback allowed consolidation of themes to improve the course

Conclusions

Co-designed questionnaire brought focus and organisation to questions leading to richer, more personalised responses for faculty More detailed reflections were attributed to better student understanding of the questionnaire rationale, and knowledge that they would aid course improvement Created a robust system for collecting long-term feedback for PsychED Up and will continue making iterative amendments

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.