Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-xxrs7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T11:55:31.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mivacurium or vecuronium for muscular relaxation in day-case surgery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2006

J. D. Rigg
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesia, Stepping Hill Hospital, Poplar Grove, Stockport, Cheshire, UK
A. C. Wilson
Affiliation:
Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK
B. J. Pollard
Affiliation:
Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK
Get access

Abstract

Anaesthetic agents for day-case surgery ideally should have a short duration of action. This study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of mivacurium and vecuronium for healthy adults undergoing dental day-case surgery. Thirty fit healthy adult patients (ASA I or II) randomly received either mivacurium 0.15 mg kg−1 (n = 15) or vecuronium 0.1 mg kg−1 (n = 15). Anaesthesia included propofol, fentanyl, nitrous oxide and isoflurane. Maximum depression of T1 was greater in the vecuronium group (99.8%) than in the mivacurium group (98.3%). There was no difference between grade of intubation at 2 min between the two groups, although patients receiving vecuronium had a more profound block at the time of intubation than those who received mivacurium (89.2% vs. 78.9%). Recovery to 10% T1 was faster in the mivacurium group (11.2 min vs. 33.1 min). All patients in the vecuronium group received neostigmine at the termination of surgery. The neostigmine evoked recovery index in the vecuronium group (4.39 min) was less than the spontaneous recovery index in the mivacurium group (6.78 min). One patient in the mivacurium group had a low plasma cholinesterase concentration (0.43 ku L−1); recovery times however, fell within the 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the group. There was no correlation between cholinesterase levels and recovery time. Mivacurium may be the more appropriate agent for dental day-case surgery because it has a shorter duration of action and does not generally require antagonism with an anticholinesterase.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
1997 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)