Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-56f9d74cfd-2vtd9 Total loading time: 0.347 Render date: 2022-06-26T23:07:14.445Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Eye protection during general anaesthesia: comparison of four different methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2004

S. Ganidagli
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Harran University Medical School, Sanliurfa, Turkey
M. Cengiz
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Harran University Medical School, Sanliurfa, Turkey
C. Becerik
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Harran University Medical School, Sanliurfa, Turkey
H. Oguz
Affiliation:
Department of Ophthalmology, Harran University Medical School, Sanliurfa, Turkey
A. Kilic
Affiliation:
Department of Ophthalmology, Harran University Medical School, Sanliurfa, Turkey
Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Correspondence
Copyright
2004 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Grover VK, Kuma KVM, Sharma S, Sethi N, Grewal SPS. Comparison of methods of eye protection under general anaesthesia. Can J Anesth 1998; 45: 575577.Google Scholar
White E, Crosse MM. The aetiology and prevention of peri-operative corneal abrasions. Anaesthesia 1998; 53: 157161.Google Scholar
Batra YK, Bali IM. Corneal abrasions during general anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1977; 56: 363365.Google Scholar
Schmidt P, Boggild-Madsen NB. Protection of the eyes with ophthalmic ointments during general anaesthesia. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1981; 59: 422427.Google Scholar
Boggild-Madsen NB, Bundgarrd-Nielsen P, Hammer U, Jakobsen B. Comparison of eye protection with methylcellulose an paraffin ointments during general anaesthesia. Can Anesth Soc J 1981; 28: 575578.Google Scholar
Manecke GR Jr, Tannenbaum DP, McCoy BE. Severe bilateral corneal injury attributed to a preservative-containing eye lubricant. Anesthesiology 2000; 93: 15451546.Google Scholar

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Eye protection during general anaesthesia: comparison of four different methods
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Eye protection during general anaesthesia: comparison of four different methods
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Eye protection during general anaesthesia: comparison of four different methods
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *