Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T09:42:34.167Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Helsinki, Human Rights, and the Gorbachev Style

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2012

Abstract

Human rights is one of three issues addressed by the Helsinki Accord, alongside security and trade matters. In the mid-seventies the accord was greeted with enthusiasm by the Soviet Union, which saw it as a means to reduce the U.S. presence in Europe. The United States, which played a limited role in drafting the accord, feared it might result in a betrayal of the various nationalities of Eastern Europe by its tacit acceptance of Soviet territorial arrangements. Over the next ten years the human rights section of the accord would become a central point of contention between the superpowers. Korey traces the evolution of the dispute and discusses Gorbachev's uneven attempts to improve the Soviet Union's recognition of human rights.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The stipulated goal for the end of the current session is July 31, 1987Google Scholar.

2 U.S. Department of State, The Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe: Public Statements and Documents, 1954–1986, Document 32 (Washington: GPO, 1986) 136Google Scholar.

3 U.S. Congress, Hearing Before the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe, 97th Cong., 2d sess., March 23, 1982, 8Google Scholar.

4 Zimmerman, Warren, “Making Moscow Pay the Price for Rights Abuses,” New York Times (August 1, 1985) op-ed pageGoogle Scholar.

5 Cited in Korey, William, Human Rights and the Helsinki Accord, Headline Series, No. 264 (New York: Foreign Policy Association, 1983) 46Google Scholar.

6 Pravda (February 26, 1986)Google Scholar.

7 TASS (July 7, 1986)Google Scholar.

8 New York Times (July 29, 1986)Google Scholar.

9 Also covered would be Soviet military conquests of former Japanese territories, scarcely a matter to win support from JapanGoogle Scholar.

10 New York Times (December 10, 1986)Google Scholar.

11 TASS (November 5, 1986)Google Scholar.

12 Statement by Kovalev, Anatoly, First Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of the USSR, at the Plenary Session of the Vienna CSCE Meeting, December 10, 1986, mimeo, 4Google Scholar.

13 Die Presse (November 8–9, 1986)Google Scholar.

14 Statement by Ambassador Warren Zimmerman, Chairman of the United States Delegation to the Vienna CSCE Follow-up Meeting, November 14, 1986, mimeo, 1Google Scholar.

15 U.S. Congress, Hearings Before the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe, 97th Cong., 2d sess., June 18, 1986, 26Google Scholar.

16 The meeting actually ended on September 21; the clock was deliberately stopped as the meeting was required to end on September 19Google Scholar.

17 New York Times (September 22, 1986)Google Scholar.

18 New York Times (September 25, 1986)Google Scholar.

19 New York Times (September 23, 1986)Google Scholar.