Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T11:37:54.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Group-theoretic obstructions to integrability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2008

R. C. Churchill ,
D. L. Rod  and
M. F. Singer
R. C. Churchill
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Hunter College, 695 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10021, USA
D. L. Rod
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada
M. F. Singer
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Box 8205, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-8205, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Let V be a four-dimensional complex symplectic vector space. This paper classifies those connected linear algebraic subgroups of the symplectic group Sp(V) that admit two independent rational invariants. As an application we show the non integrability of a three degree of freedom Hamiltonian system.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , February 1995 , pp. 15 - 48
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[A-M]Abraham, R. and Marsden, J.. Foundations of Mechanics. (Second edition). Addision-Wesley: Redwood City, California, 1978.Google Scholar
[B-C-R]Baider, A., Churchill, R.C. and Rod, D.L.. Monodromy and non integrability in complex Hamiltonian systems. J. Dynam. Diff. Eq. 2 (1990), pp. 451–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[B-C-R-S]Baider, A., Churchill, R.C., Rod, D.L. and Singer, M.. On the infinitesimal geometry of integrable systems. In Proc. Fields Institute Workshop ‘Mechanics Days’. Amer. Math. Soc. To be published.Google Scholar
[C-L]Coddington, E.A. and Levinson, N.. Theory of Ordinary Differential Equations. McGraw-Hill: New York, 1955.Google Scholar
[F]Fogarty, J.. Invariant Theory. W.A. Benjamin: New York, 1969.Google Scholar
[FOR]Forster, O.. Lectures on Riemann Surfaces. Springer-Verlag: New York, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[HAE]Haefliger, A.. Local theory of meromorphic connections in dimension one (Fuchs' theory). In Algebraic D- Modules, eds, Borel, A. et al. Academic: New York, 1981. pp. 130–150.Google Scholar
[H-K]Hoffman, K. and Kunze, R.A.. Linear Algebra. (Second edition). Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1971.Google Scholar
[Hoch]Hochshild, G.P.. Basic Theory of Algebraic Groups and Lie Algebras. Springer: New York, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[H-1]Humphreys, J.. Introduction to Lie Algebras and Representation Theory. Springer: New York, 1980.Google Scholar
[H-2]Humphreys, J.. Linear Algebraic Groups. Springer: New York, 1981.Google Scholar
[KAP]Kaplansky, I.. An Introduction to Differential Algebra. (Second edition). Hermann: Paris, 1976.Google Scholar
[KIR]Kirwan, F.. Complex Algebraic Curves. London Math. Soc. Student Texts 23. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[KOD]Kodaira, K.. Complex Manifolds and Deformation of Complex Structures. Springer: New York, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[KOV]Kovacic, J.. An algorithm for solving second order linear homogeneous differential equations. J. Symbolic Comput. 2 (1986), pp. 3–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[K-S]Kummer, M. and Saenz, A.W.. Non-integrability of the classical Zeeman Hamiltonian. Comm. Math. Phys. To appear.Google Scholar
[MAS]Massey, W.S.. Algebraic Topology: An Introduction. Springer: New York, 1989.Google Scholar
[N-Z-M]Niven, I., Zuckerman, H.S. and Montgomery, H.L.. An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers. (Fifth edition). John Wiley: New York, 1991.Google Scholar
[POOLE]Poole, E.G.C.. Introduction to the Theory of Linear Differential Equations. Dover: New York, 1960.Google Scholar
[SCHUR]Schur, I.. Vorlesungen über Invariantentheorie. Springer: Berlin, 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[S]Singer, M.F.. An outline of differential galois theory. In Computer Algebra and Differential Equations, ed., Tournier, E.. Academic: New York, 1990. pp. 3–57.Google Scholar
[SU1]Singer, M.F. and Ulmer, F.. Galois groups of second and third order linear differential equations. J. Symbolic Comput., 16 (1993), p. 9–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[SU2]Singer, M.F. and Ulmer, F.. Liouvillian and algebraic solutions of second and third order linear differential equations. J. Symbolic Comput. 16 (1993), p. 37–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Sp-1]Springer, T.A.. Invariant Theory. Springer Lecture Notes in Mathematics 585. Springer: New York, 1977.Google Scholar
[Sp-2]Springer, T.A.. Linear Algebraic Groups. Birkhauser: Boston, 1981.Google Scholar
[T-T]Tretkoff, C. and Tretkoff, M.. Solution of the inverse problem of differential galois theory in the classical case. Amer. J. Math. 101 (1979), pp. 1327–1332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[VAR-1]Varadarajan, V.S.. Lie Groups, Lie Algebras and their Representations. Springer: New York, 1990.Google Scholar
[VAR-2]Varadarajan, V.S.. Meromorphic differential equations. Expo. Math. 9 (1991), pp. 97–188.Google Scholar
[Zi]Ziglin, S.L.. Branching of solutions and non-existence of first integrals in Hamiltonian mechanics I. Functional Anal. Appl. 16 (1982), pp. 181–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar