Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T04:02:45.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radiographic study of bit position within the horse's oral cavity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

J Manfredi ,
HM Clayton  and
D Rosenstein
J Manfredi
Affiliation:
Mary Anne McPhail Equine Performance Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1314, USA
HM Clayton*
Affiliation:
Mary Anne McPhail Equine Performance Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1314, USA
D Rosenstein
Affiliation:
Mary Anne McPhail Equine Performance Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1314, USA
*
*claytonh@cvm.msu.edu
Get access

Abstract

The objective was to describe and compare the positions of different types of bits within the horse's oral cavity. Eight horses were fitted with a bridle and six bits [jointed snaffle ( JS), Boucher, KK Ultra, Myler snaffle (MylerS), Myler ported barrel (MylerPB), Myler correctional-ported barrel (MylerCPB)]. Lateral radiographs and custom software were used to measure the position and orientation of the bits relative to the horse's palate and second premolar teeth without rein tension and with 25±5 N bilateral rein tension. The results showed differences in the position of the bits within the horse's oral cavity and in their movements in response to rein tension. Without rein tension, single-jointed bits were further from the premolar teeth ( JS 32.2±10.6 mm; Boucher 33.9±10.8 mm) than the Myler bits (MylerS 20.2±9.7 mm; MylerPB 12.8±6.7 mm; MylerCPB 14.6±4.3 mm). Single-jointed bits moved closer to the premolars when tension was applied to the reins (JS 20.8±6.3 mm; Boucher 19.7±6.8 mm). The cannons of the Boucher were more elevated than those of the other bits. The cannon angulation decreased significantly from 38.7±13.7 deg. to 21.6±6.9 deg. for JS and from 43.1±10.1 deg. to 27.8±10.1 deg. for the Boucher when tension was applied to the reins. The Myler bits showed minimal change in position in response to the application of rein tension.

Keywords

horseequestrianbitsnaffleradiography
Type
Research Article
Information
Equine and Comparative Exercise Physiology , Volume 2 , Issue 3 , August 2005 , pp. 195 - 201
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Anthony, D and Brown, D (1991). The origins of horseback riding. Antiquity 65: 22–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Cook, WR and Strasser, H (2003). Metal in the Mouth. Qualicum Beach, Canada Sabine Kells.Google Scholar
3Dixon, PM, Tremaine, WH, Pickles, K, Kuhns, L, Hawe, C, McCann, J, McGorum, BC, Railton, D and Brammer, S (2000). Equine dental disease. Part 3: a long-term study of 400 cases: disorders of wear, traumatic damage and idiopathic fractures, tumours and miscellaneous disorders of the cheek teeth. Equine Veterinary Journal 32: 9–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Smith, JC (1993). Osteitis and sequestrum formation of the interdental region of the mandible in 11 polo ponies. Veterinary Record 133: 188–189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Engelke, E and Gasse, H (2003). An anatomical study of the rostral part of the equine oral cavity with respect to position and size of a snaffle bit. Equine Veterinary Education 15: 200–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Knox–Thompson, E and Dickens, S (1990). Pony Club Manual No. 2. Auckland: Ray Richards.Google Scholar
7Myler, D, Myler, R and Myler, B (2000). A Whole Bit Better. Lake Oswego, OR: Toklat Originals.Google Scholar
8Clayton, HM and Lee, RL (1984). A fluoroscopic study of the position and action of the jointed snaffle bit in the horse's mouth. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 4: 193–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Clayton, HM (1985). A fluoroscopic study of the position and action of different bits in the horse's mouth. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 5: 68–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Clayton, HM, Singleton, WH, Lanovaz, JL and Cloud, GL (2005). Strain gauge measurement of rein tension during riding: a pilot study. Equine and Comparative Exercise Physiology (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Bennett, DG (2001). Bits and bitting: form and function. Proceedings of the American Association of Equine Practitioners 47: 130–141.Google Scholar
12Scoggins, RD (1989). Bits and mouth injuries. Veterinary Review 9: 101–102.Google Scholar
13Tuke, DM (1965). Bits and Bitting. London: JA Allen and Co., Ltd., p.31.Google Scholar