Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T13:19:16.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reassessing Lucky Understanding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2022

Miloud Belkoniene Open the ORCID record for Miloud Belkoniene [Opens in a new window]
Miloud Belkoniene*
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
*
Email: miloud.belkoniene@glasgow.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Knowledge is widely regarded as being incompatible with epistemic luck, but according to several philosophers, the same does not hold for understanding. This paper examines to what extent understanding is vulnerable to epistemic luck. After discussing the weaknesses of some of the cases that have been offered to support the conclusion that understanding tolerates environmental epistemic luck, I turn to a more recent one offered in favour of the opposite conclusion. I argue that this case does not manage to establish that understanding is vulnerable to environmental luck; this even if the fact that understanding comes in degrees is taken into account. Finally, I examine the vulnerability of understanding to intervening luck – the type of luck present in classical Gettier cases – and conclude that when such luck is present, one's understanding is necessarily sub-optimal; a conclusion that does not hold, according to what I argue, when it comes to environmental luck.

Keywords

Understandingknowledgeepistemic luckgraspingjustification
Type
Article
Information
Episteme , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , June 2023 , pp. 513 - 527
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Belkoniene, M. (Forthcoming). ‘Grasping in Understanding.’ British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.Google Scholar
Boyd, K. (2020). ‘Environmental Luck and the Structure of Understanding.’ Episteme 17, 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chisholm, R. (1966). Theory of Knowledge, Foundations of Philosophy Series. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Elgin, C. (2017). True Enough. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, A. (1976). ‘Discrimination and Perceptual Knowledge.’ Journal of Philosophy 73, 771–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, S. (2006). ‘Is Understanding a Species of Knowledge?’ British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57, 515–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hills, A. (2009). ‘Moral Testimony and Moral Epistemology.’ Ethics 120, 94–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hills, A. (2016). ‘Understanding Why.’ Noûs 50, 661–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelp, C. (2015). ‘Understanding Phenomena.’ Synthese 192, 3799–3816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelp, C. (2017). ‘Towards a Knowledge-Based Account of Understanding.’ In Grimm, S., Baumberger, C. and Ammon, S. (eds), Explaining Understanding: New Essays in Epistemology and the Philosophy of Science, pp. 251–71. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Khalifa, K. (2013). ‘Understanding, Grasping, and Luck.’ Episteme 10, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalifa, K. (2017). Understanding, Explanation, and Scientific Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kvanvig, J. (2003). The Value of Knowledge and the Pursuit of Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipton, P. (2004). Inference to the Best Explanation, 2nd edn. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Morris, K. (2012). ‘A Defense of Lucky Understanding.’ British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63, 357–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, D. (2005). Epistemic Luck. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, D. (2008). ‘Knowing the Answer, Understanding and Epistemic Value.’ Grazer Philosophische Studien 77, 325–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, D. (2009). ‘Knowledge, Understanding and Epistemic Value.’ Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements 64, 19–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, D. (2010). ‘Knowledge and Understanding.’ In Haddock, A., Millar, A. and Pritchard, D. (eds), The Nature and Value of Knowledge: Three Investigations, pp. 3–91. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohwer, Y. (2014). ‘Lucky Understanding Without Knowledge.’ Synthese 191, 945–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shechtman, D., Blech, I., Gratias, D. and Cahn, J.W. (1984). ‘Metallic Phase with Long-Range Orientational Order and No Translational Symmetry.’ Physical Review Letters 53, 1951–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zagzebski, L. (2009). On Epistemology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar