Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T01:29:12.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Epistemic Benefits of Multiple Biased Observers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2012

Robert E. Goodin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We know that we can learn much from the reports of multiple competent, independent, unbiased observers. There are also things we can learn from the reports of competent but biased observers. Specifically, when reports go against the grain of an agent’s known biases, we can be relatively confident in the veracity of those reports. Triangulating on the truth via that mechanism requires a multiplicity of observers with distinct biases, each of whose reports might be one-way decisive in that fashion. It also presupposes that all observers share the same fundamental epistemic standards.

Type
Research Article
Information
Episteme , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , October 2006 , pp. 166 - 174
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Freeman, Derek. (1983). Margaret Mead and Samoa: The Making and Unmaking of an Anthropological Myth. Canberra: ANU Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, Derek. (1999). The Fateful Hoaxing of Margaret Mead. Boulder, Colorado: Westview.Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert E. (1983). Voting through the looking glass. American Political Science Review 77: 420–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary. (1995). Replication, replication. PS: Political Science & Politics 28: 444–52.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip. (2001). Science, Truth and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno and Steve, Woolgar. (1979). Laboratory Life. Beverly Hills, California: Sage.Google Scholar
List, Christian and Pettit, Philip. (2007). Agency Incorporated. Manuscript, Princeton University and London School of Economics.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. (1852). Eighteenth brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. In Complete Works, vol. 11, pp. 99–197. London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1979.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl. (1965). Conjectures and Refutations. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. (1961). Two dogmas of empiricism. In From a Logical Point of View, 2nd edn., pp. 20–46. Cambrdige, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, David. (1996). Heretic: Based on the Life of Derek Freeman. Ringwood, Vic.: Penguin/Currency Press.Google Scholar