Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-27gpq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T17:08:22.644Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prisoners at ultra-high-risk for psychosis: a cross-sectional study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2015

M. Jarrett*
Affiliation:
King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK South London and Maudsley NHS Trust, London, UK
L. Valmaggia
Affiliation:
King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK South London and Maudsley NHS Trust, London, UK
J. Parrott
Affiliation:
Oxleas NHS Trust, Essex, UK
A. Forrester
Affiliation:
King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK South London and Maudsley NHS Trust, London, UK
T. Winton-Brown
Affiliation:
King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK South London and Maudsley NHS Trust, London, UK
H. Maguire
Affiliation:
Hellingly Medium Secure Unit, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Hellingly, UK
D. Ndegwa
Affiliation:
South London and Maudsley NHS Trust, London, UK
P. McGuire
Affiliation:
King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK South London and Maudsley NHS Trust, London, UK
T. K. J. Craig
Affiliation:
King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK South London and Maudsley NHS Trust, London, UK
*
*Address for correspondence: M. Jarrett, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London S5 8AF, UK. (Email: manuela.jarrett@kcl.ac.uk)

Abstract

Background.

The definition of ultra-high risk (UHR) for psychosis was derived from community-based help-seeking populations. Prisoners have high rates of psychosis and other severe mental health (MH) problems. They also have high rates of risk factors for psychiatric morbidity and yet they are among the populations who are less likely to seek help in the community. Despite a policy of equivalence of care for individuals in prison there are no early intervention services for psychosis in prisons in the UK. This was a study exploring feasibility of introducing such a service into a local London prison. This paper discusses the differences in MH profile of prisoners who met criteria for at-risk mental state compared with those who did not.

Method.

A two-stage procedure was used. Participants in a local London prison were routinely screened in the first week of arrival in prison with the Prodrome Questionnaire – Brief Version (PQ-B; Loewy et al. 2011). Those that screened positive as well as a small sample of those who screened negative underwent a further semi-structured assessment to see whether they met criteria for UHR state. Data on self-harm and suicide attempt, family psychiatric history, and anxiety and depression was also collected.

Results.

A total of 891 prisoners were screened, 44% of whom screened positive. A total of 354 underwent second stage assessment, 60 of whom had screened negative. Four groups were identified: those that had no MH problems, a group experiencing First Episode Psychosis, those at UHR of psychosis and a group with other MH problems. The UHR state and Psychotic groups had very similar MH profiles of symptoms and distress. Prisoners with no MH problems were at the other end of the spectrum with few symptoms and little distress. The Other group fell in between this group and the psychotic spectrum group in terms of symptomology and distress.

Conclusions.

This study is the first to examine risk for psychosis in an adult male prison population. We identified a broad spectrum of MH disorder for which there is little current service provision in prisons. Screening early in the custodial process has the potential to identify unmet MH need and has implications for keeping individuals safe in custody. A long-term strategic approach is required to address MH need in prisons.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Birmingham, L, Mason, D, Grubin, D (1996). Prevalence of mental disorder in remand prisoners: consecutive case study. British Medical Journal 313, 15211524.Google Scholar
Black, G, Forrester, A, Wilks, M, Riaz, M, Maguire, H, Carlin, P (2011). Using initiative to provide clinical intervention groups in prison: a process evaluation. International Review of Psychiatry 23, 7076.Google Scholar
Brugha, T, Singleton, N, Meltzer, H, Bebbington, P, Farrell, M, Jenkins, R, Coid, J, Fryers, T, Melzer, D, Lewis, G (2005). Psychosis in the community and in prisons: a report from the British National Survey of psychiatric morbidity. American Journal of Psychiatry 162, 774780.Google Scholar
Byng, R, Quinn, C, Sheaff, R, Samele, C, Duggan, S, Harrison, D, Owens, C, Smithson, P, Wright, C, Annison, J, Browns, C, Taylor, R, Henley, W, Qureshi, A, Shenton, D, Porter, I, Warrington, C, Campbell, J (2012). COCOA: Care for Offenders Continuity of Access. London National Institute for Health Research, Queen's Printer and Controller of HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Cannon, TD, Cadenhead, K, Cornblatt, B, Woods, SW, Addington, J, Walker, E, Seidman, LJ, Perkins, D, Tsuang, M, McGlashan, T, Heinssen, R (2008). Prediction of psychosis in youth at high clinical risk: a multisite longitudinal study in North America. Archives of General Psychiatry 65, 2837.Google Scholar
Department of Health (2002). Health Promoting Prisons: A Shared Approach. London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
Fusar-Poli, P, Byrne, M, Badger, S, Valmaggia, LR, McGuire, PK (2012 a). Outreach and support in South London (OASIS), 2001–2011: ten years of early diagnosis and treatment for young individuals at high clinical risk for psychosis. European Psychiatry. doi:pii: S0924-9338(12)00098-3. 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2012.08.002 [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
Fusar-Poli, P, Nelson, B, Valmaggia, L, Yung, A, McGuire, P (2012 b). Comorbid depressive and anxiety disorders in 509 individuals with an at risk mental state: impact on psychopathology and transition to psychosis. Schizophrenia Bulletin. First published online November.Google Scholar
Fusar-Poli, P, Yung, AR, McGorry, P, van Os, J (2013). Lessons learned from the psychosis high-risk state: towards a general staging model of prodromal intervention. Psychological Medicine 18, 18 [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
Gayer-Anderson, C, Morgan, C (2013). Social networks, support and early psychosis: a systematic review. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences 22, 131146.Google Scholar
Goldman, HH, Skodol, AE, Lave, TR (1992). Revising axis V for DSM-IV: a review of measures of social functioning. American Journal of Psychiatry 149, 11481156.Google Scholar
Harty, M, Tighe, J, Leese, M, Parrott, J, Thornicroft, G (2003). Inverse care for mentally ill prisoners: Unmet needs in forensic mental health services. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology; 14, 600614.Google Scholar
Hutton, P, Bowe, S, Parker, S, Ford, S (2011). Prevalence of suicide risk factors in people at ultra-high risk of developing psychosis: a service audit. Early Intervention in Psychiatry 5, 375380.Google Scholar
Jarrett, M, Craig, T, Parrott, J, Forrester, A, Winton-Brown, T, Maguire, H, McGuire, P, Valmaggia, L (2012). Identifying men at ultra high risk of psychosis in a prison population. Schizophrenia Research 136, 16.Google Scholar
Kelleher, I, Lynch, F, Harley, M, Molloy, C, Roddy, S, Fitzpatrick, C, Cannon, M (2012). Psychotic symptoms in adolescence index risk for suicidal behavior: findings from 2 population-based case–control clinical interview studies. Archives of General Psychiatry 69, 12771283.Google Scholar
Lin, A, Nelson, B, Yung, AR (2012). ‘At Risk’ for psychosis: where are we heading? Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences 21, 329334.Google Scholar
Loewy, RL, Pearson, R, Vinogradov, S, Bearden, CE, Cannon, TD (2011). Psychosis risk screening with the Prodromal Questionnaire – brief version (PQ-B). Schizophrenia Research 129, 4246.Google Scholar
McGorry, P, Bates, T, Birchwood, M (2013). Designing Youth Mental health services for the 21st century: examples from Australia, Ireland and the UK. The British Journal of Psychiatry 202, s30s35.Google Scholar
McKenzie, CS, Gekoski, WL, Knox, VJ (2006). Age, gender, and the underutilization of mental health services: The influence of help-seeking attitudes. Aging & Mental Health, 10, 574582.Google Scholar
Meltzer, H, Gill, B, Petticrew, M (1995). OPCS Surveys of Psychiatric Morbidity in Great Britain. Report No 1. The Prevalence of Psychiatric Morbidity among Adults aged 16 ± 64 Living in Private Households in Great Britain. HMSO: London.Google Scholar
Morgan, C, Mallett, R, Hutchinson, G, Bagalkote, H, Morgan, K, Fearon, P, Dazzan, P, Boydell, J, McKenzie, K, Harrison, G, Murray, R, Jones, P, Craig, T, Leff, J on behalf of the AESOP Study Group (2005). Pathways to care and ethnicity. Part 2: Source of referral and help-seeking. British Journal of Psychiatry, 186, 290296.Google Scholar
National Treatment Agency for Substance Misuse (2012). NTA prison drug treatment note for Home Affairs Select Committee 2012 Drug Policy Review.Google Scholar
Rietdijk, J, Ising, HK, Draght, S, Klaassen, R, Niem, D, Wunderink, L, Cuijpers, P, Linszen, M, van de Graag, M (2013). Depression and social anxiety in help-seeking patients with an ultra-high risk for developing psychosis. Psychiatry Research. ONLINE, February 2013.Google Scholar
Ruhrmann, S, Schultze-Lutter, F, Salokangas, RK, Heinimaa, M, Linszen, D, Dingemans, P, Birchwood, M, Patterson, P, Juckel, G, Heinz, A, Morrison, A, Lewis, S, von Reventlow, HG, Klosterkötter, J (2010). Prediction of psychosis in adolescents and young adults at high risk: results from the prospective European prediction of psychosis study. Archives of General Psychiatry 67, 241251.Google Scholar
Senior, J, Birmingham, L, Harty, MA, Hassan, L, Hayes, AJ, Kendall, K, King, C, Lathlean, J, Lowthian, C, Mills, A, Webb, R, Thornicroft, G, Shaw, J (2013). Identification and management of prisoners with severe psychiatric illness by specialist mental health services. Psychological Medicine 43, 15111520.Google Scholar
Shaw, J, Baker, D, Hunt, IM, Moloney, A, Appleby, L (2004). Suicide by prisoners. National clinical survey. British Journal of Psychiatry, 184, 263267.Google Scholar
Shaw, J, Senior, J, Thornicroft, G, Birmingham, L, Kendall, K, Brooker, C (2009). A national evaluation of prison mental health in-reach services. A Report to the National Institute of Health Research.Google Scholar
Singleton, N, Meltzer, H, Gatward, R, Coid, J, Deasy, D (1998). Psychiatric morbidity among prisoners. Office of National Statistics.Google Scholar
Valmaggia, L, Stahl, D, Yung, A, Nelson, B, Fusar-Poli, P, McGorry, P, McGuire, P (2013). Negative psychotic symptoms and impaired role functioning predict transition outcomes in the at risk mental state: a latent class cluster analysis study. Psychological Medicine 115.Google Scholar
Velthorst, E, Nelson, B, Wiltink, S, de Haan, L, Wood, SJ, Lin, A, Yung, AR (2013). Transition to first episode psychosis in ultra high risk populations: does baseline functioning hold the key? Schizophrenia Research 143, 132137.Google Scholar
Williams, K, Papadopoulou, V, Booth, N (2012 a). Prisoners' childhood and family backgrounds: results from the Surveying Prisoner Crime Reduction (SPCR) longitudinal cohort study of prisoners. Ministry of Justice Research Series 4/12.Google Scholar
Williams, K, Poyser, J, Hopkins, K (2012 b). Accommodation, homelessness and reoffending of prisoners: results from the Surveying Prisoner Crime Reduction (SPCR) Survey. Ministry of Justice Research.Google Scholar
Yung, AR, McGorry, PD (1996). The initial prodrome in psychosis: descriptive anaD qualitative aspects. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 30, 587599.Google Scholar
Yung, AR, Yuen, HP, McGorry, PD, Phillips, LJ, Kelly, D, Dell'Olio, M, Francey, SM, Cosgrave, EM, Killackey, E, Stanford, C, Godfrey, K, Buckby, J (2005). Mapping the onset of psychosis: the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 39, 964971.Google Scholar