Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-65dc7cd545-rrwn7 Total loading time: 0.379 Render date: 2021-07-25T10:50:43.544Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Temporal and spatial distribution of anthrax outbreaks among Kenyan wildlife, 1999–2017

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2019

J. M. Gachohi
Affiliation:
Washington State University Global Health Kenya, Washington State University, Nairobi, Kenya School of Public Health, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya
F. Gakuya
Affiliation:
Kenya Wildlife Service, Nairobi, Kenya
I. Lekolool
Affiliation:
Kenya Wildlife Service, Nairobi, Kenya
E. Osoro
Affiliation:
Washington State University Global Health Kenya, Washington State University, Nairobi, Kenya
L. Nderitu
Affiliation:
Washington State University Global Health Kenya, Washington State University, Nairobi, Kenya
P. Munyua
Affiliation:
Division of Global Health Protection, United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Nairobi, Kenya
I. Ngere
Affiliation:
Washington State University Global Health Kenya, Washington State University, Nairobi, Kenya
N. Kemunto
Affiliation:
Washington State University Global Health Kenya, Washington State University, Nairobi, Kenya
B. Bett
Affiliation:
International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya
F. Otieno
Affiliation:
International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya
M. Muturi
Affiliation:
Kenya Zoonotic Disease Unit, Nairobi, Kenya
A. Mwatondo
Affiliation:
Kenya Zoonotic Disease Unit, Nairobi, Kenya
M. A. Widdowson
Affiliation:
Division of Global Health Protection, United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Nairobi, Kenya
M. Kariuki Njenga
Affiliation:
Washington State University Global Health Kenya, Washington State University, Nairobi, Kenya
Corresponding
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The burden of anthrax in wildlife is demonstrated through high numbers of sudden mortalities among herbivore species, including endangered animal species. East Africa is home of multiple species of faunal wildlife numbering in the millions but there are limited disease surveillance programmes, resulting in a paucity of information on the role of anthrax and other infectious diseases on declining wildlife populations in the region. We reviewed historical data on anthrax outbreaks from Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS) spanning from 1999 to 2017 in Kenya to determine the burden, characteristics and spatial distribution of anthrax outbreaks. A total of 51 anthrax outbreaks associated with 1014 animal deaths were reported across 20 of 60 wildlife conservation areas located in six of the seven agro-ecological zones. Overall, 67% of the outbreaks were reported during the dry seasons, affecting 24 different wildlife species. Over 90% (22 of 24) of the affected species were herbivore, including 12 grazers, five browsers and five mixed grazers and browsers. Buffaloes (23.5%), black rhinos (21.6%) and elephants (17.6%) were the most frequently affected species. Our findings demonstrate the extensive geographic distribution of wildlife anthrax in the country, making it one of the important infectious diseases that threaten wildlife conservation.

Type
Original Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2019

Introduction

The high loss of faunal diversity in national parks and a growing number of endangered wildlife species have highlighted the need for an improved wildlife disease surveillance in order to identify prevalent diseases for prevention and control [Reference Belant and Deese1, Reference Grogan2]. Enhanced and timely wildlife disease surveillance and subsequent control and prevention of some of these diseases would also prevent spill over of endemic and emerging diseases to livestock and humans, supporting global health security [Reference Belant and Deese1, Reference Katz3]. However, wildlife surveillance presents unique challenges associated with limited access to animals, case identification and ecological characteristics of national parks and other forested areas where wildlife inhabit, such as expansiveness of conservation areas [Reference Ryser-Degiorgis4]. In sub-Saharan Africa, wildlife disease surveillance systems are limited to responding to large outbreaks or narrowly focused retrospective and prospective studies, approaches that have helped in implementing disease outbreak control strategies, estimating specific disease burden and identifying wildlife reservoirs of livestock or human diseases [Reference Leendertz5Reference Hoffmann8].

Anthrax, a highly infectious disease of domestic and wild mammals caused by Bacillus anthracis bacteria, can result in a large-scale loss of wildlife and livestock worldwide [Reference Leendertz5Reference Hoffmann8]. For example, an anthrax outbreak in Luangwa river valley in Zambia resulted in the death of >4000 hippopotami in addition to buffalos and elephants [Reference Turnbull6]. Another outbreak in Malilangwe wildlife reserve in Zimbabwe resulted in the death of almost all the kudu, and 40–70% of bushbucks, waterbucks, nyala, buffalos and roan antelopes [Reference Clegg7]. Between October 2001 and June 2002, an anthrax outbreak in the tropical forest of Ivory Coast resulted in the death of eight chimpanzees [Reference Leendertz5]. In fact, a recent comprehensive study of this tropical rain forest found that B. anthracis has been responsible for widespread and persistent mortality among domestic and wild mammals for three decades [Reference Hoffmann8]. Even in developed countries such as Canada, substantial death of wild bison associated with anthrax outbreaks has been reported [Reference Salb9]. The East African region consists of one of the largest and most diverse wildlife ecosystems in the world, in particular the contiguous ecosystem of Masai Mara and Amboseli national parks in Kenya, and Serengeti and Kilimanjaro national parks in Tanzania [Reference Okello10]. Furthermore, the world-famous annual wildebeest (Connochaetes taurinus) migration occurs between the Masai Mara and Serengeti national parks [Reference Hopcraft, Sinclair, Metzger, Mduma and Fryxell11]. A recent study in Kenya reported three anthrax outbreaks over a period of 4 years in the same locality of Rift valley in Kenya that resulted in the death of 10.5% of all wildlife herbivores in a local national park, including 17% of the buffalos and 16% endangered black rhinos and white rhinos [Reference Muturi12].

Here, we reviewed wildlife records to describe the temporal and spatial distribution of anthrax outbreaks among Kenyan wildlife between 1999 and 2017, a period when there was an improved collection of wildlife disease data in the country. This improvement was catalysed by establishing the One Health office in Kenya of which the Kenya Wildlife Services (KWS) participated in its creation since 2011. The office is operationalised through a zoonotic disease unit (ZDU) with staff drawn from Kenya's Ministries of Health and that of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries [Reference Mbabu13]. Since its operational launch on 1 March 2012, the need for effective wildlife health surveillance has been progressively recognised within KWS to align with ZDU's objective of instituting and maintaining active collaboration at the animal, human and environment nexus focused on better prevention and control of zoonotic diseases.

Methods

We reviewed records at the KWS of diagnosed anthrax outbreaks and occurrences in wildlife in Kenya from 1999 to 2017. Records included annual reports, specific case reports, surveillance reports and post-mortem reports. At the KWS, the anthrax disease records were generated from clinical surveillance of dead or visibly sick animals by the wildlife veterinarians and game rangers. A confirmed anthrax outbreak was defined as one in which at least one case was diagnosed using Gram and methylene blue stains and identification of the capsule and typical rod-shaped B. anthracis in clinical specimens submitted to the KWS laboratory in Nairobi or one of the regional veterinary investigation laboratories [14].

We developed a database of all the outbreaks in an MS Excel® sheet with the following as variables: conservation region, conservation area, agro-ecological zone (AEZ), month and year of occurrence, wildlife species affected and its food niche. The KWS has administratively divided the country into eight wildlife conservation regions depending on geographical location in Kenya: Coast, Tsavo, Southern, Central Rift, Western, Mountain, Eastern and Northern conservation regions (Fig. 1). Within the eight conservation regions are 60 conservation areas consisting of parks, reserves, sanctuaries and conservancies that contain wildlife that are either in protected areas (secured and monitored national parks, national reserves or national sanctuaries) or unprotected free-ranging areas where they sometimes mingle with domestic animals. AEZs are land units defined based on the patterns of soil, landform and climatic characteristics. Kenya has seven AEZs that include agro-alpine, high potential, medium potential, semi-arid, arid, very-arid and desert. Cross-tabulation of variables was carried out using Pivot tables in Excel and analysis was carried out using the Stata statistical software (Stata12/SE, StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). We used quantum geographical information system (QGIS) software to create a map showing locations of conservation areas and free-ranging areas for Kenyan wildlife [15].

Fig. 1. Map of Kenya showing the eight administrative wildlife conservation regions (shaded in different colours) and the conservation areas (red hexagons) where the 51 anthrax outbreaks were reported during 1999–2017. NP refers to national park, NR refers to national reserve.

Results

Distribution of anthrax outbreaks and mortalities by conservation areas

Between 1999 and 2017, 51 anthrax outbreaks were recorded in 20 of 60 wildlife conservation areas spread across seven of the eight wildlife conservation regions of the country, with the exception of Western region (Table 1, Fig. 1). Of these, 19 outbreaks (37%) were reported in Nairobi and Lake Nakuru conservation areas, whereas the other 32 outbreaks (63%) occurred across 18 conservation areas. A total of 1014 wild animal deaths associated with the 51 anthrax outbreaks were recorded, with 81% (N = 816) of these deaths occurring in the Lake Nakuru conservation area during six separate outbreaks.

Table 1. Distribution of anthrax outbreaks and mortalities by conservation area, county and agro-ecological zone

When we defined the dominant AEZ for each conservation area where an anthrax outbreak occurred, we found that the 51 outbreaks were spread across six of the seven AEZs, with the exception of the agro-alpine zone that did not have any reported outbreaks (Table 1).

Distribution of outbreaks by species

The anthrax outbreaks affected 24 different wildlife species. Of the 51 outbreak records, buffaloes (23.5%), black rhinos (21.6%) and elephants (17.6%) were the most frequently affected species (Table 2). Except for few lions and foxes (two species) that were involved in two outbreaks, the other animal species involved in outbreaks were 22 herbivore species, including 12 (54.5%) with grazers, five (22.7%) with browsers and five (22.7%) with mixed grazers and browsers (Table 2) implying grazer and mixed grazer/browser herbivores were threefold more frequently affected than browser (77% vs. 23%).

Table 2. Frequency of wildlife species involvement in the anthrax outbreaks and the species food niche

Temporal and seasonal distribution of outbreaks

To better describe the temporal trend of anthrax outbreaks, a 3-yearly rolling average of the outbreaks from 1999 to 2017 was considered (Fig. 2). The temporal distribution of outbreaks between 1999 and 2017 shows an increase in the frequency of occurrence between 2005 and 2017 (Fig. 2). When classified by month of occurrence, the data show that of 48 outbreaks with information, 32 (67%) occurred during the dry months, including 15 (31%) in the dry and hot season between January to March, and 17 (36%) in the dry and cold months of June to September (Fig. 3). In contrast, 16 (33%) occurred during the rainy seasons including 11 (23%) during the long rain of April and May and five (10%) during the short rains of October to December (Fig. 3).

Fig. 2. Three-yearly rolling average of anthrax outbreaks in Kenyan wildlife, 1999–2017.

Fig. 3. Monthly distribution of anthrax outbreaks in Kenyan wildlife between 1999 and 2017.

Discussion

The findings of this study demonstrated the risk posed by B. anthracis to the wildlife population, illustrated by an outbreak at Lake Nakuru national park in 2015 that resulted in the death of 10.5% of all wildlife herbivores in the park, including 17% of the buffalos and 16% endangered black rhinos and white rhinos. Even though outbreaks were reported in <50% of all the wildlife conservation areas in Kenya, we suspected that the outbreaks were more widespread but unreported because of the inherent weaknesses of detecting wildlife deaths in the presence of scavengers.

Our data show that anthrax outbreaks were reported in both dry and wet seasons, however two-thirds of the outbreaks occurred during the 7 months of the dry seasons (January, February, March, June, July, August and September) in Kenya, perhaps suggesting that reduced moisture content is more important than temperature in the occurrence of outbreaks. This finding is consistent with other studies and could be attributed, in a limited way, to increased soil ingestion and spore inhalation during animal feeding when vegetation is depleted [Reference Turner16Reference Mwakapenje21]. It is likely that animals also exhibit increased geophagia (consumption of soil) during the dry seasons, particularly in areas with mineral deficiencies [Reference Ayotte22]. Additionally, there is a social mixing of animals, both wildlife and domestic animals that invade national conservation areas during the dry seasons in search of pasture and water. The dry season is also linked with stress in animals associated with nutritional deficiencies, heat and parasitism resulting in lowered host immunity [Reference Hugh-Jones and de Vos23, Reference Bengis, Miller and Fowler24]. During the dry seasons, vegetation becomes increasingly dry and abrasive and may increase the chances of broken mucosa in the mouth facilitating entry of ingested B. anthracis spores into the blood circulation [Reference Starr25]. Receding spore-contaminated water following flooding may also contaminate pastures thus establishing new foci of infection to grazer herbivores. Most wildlife conservation areas in Kenya are located in arid and semi-arid lands, similar to the situation in other countries in sub-Saharan Africa including Namibia, South Africa, Zimbabwe and Tanzania [Reference Clegg7, Reference Palmer, Peel and Kerley26Reference Lembo28]. However, it is interesting to note that we did not find records of anthrax outbreaks in wildlife conservancies in agro-alpine regions of Kenya including the Aberdare and Mount Kenya national parks. This observation is consistent with our findings that more outbreaks occur during the dry season, and it may be explained by the similar associated risk factors [Reference Muturi12].

The other finding in our study was that >90% of the wildlife species affected by anthrax outbreaks were herbivore, primarily because of their well-documented high susceptibility to B. anthracis infection when compared to carnivores and primates [Reference De Vos, Turnbull, Coetzer and Tustin17, Reference Hugh-Jones and de Vos23, Reference Cormack-Gates, Elkin, Dragon, Williams and Barker29]. Among herbivores, we found that grazer and mixed grazer/browser herbivores were threefold more frequently affected than browser (77% vs. 23%). This finding is in contrast with observations from studies in southern Africa, including in Malilangwe wildlife reserve in Zimbabwe where browsers accounted for >75% of herbivore mortalities, >3-fold higher than that observed in grazers and mixed grazer/browser [Reference Clegg7, Reference Hassim30]. The different levels of susceptibility between grazers and browsers are attributed to feeding behaviour; grazers feed closer to the soil where B. anthracis spores are maintained thus increasing the risk of ingesting or inhaling the infective spores. However, the higher anthrax occurrence among browsers in southern Africa is attributed to necrophagic flies that transfer the spores from carcasses to high vegetation leaves and twigs that browsers feed on [Reference Clegg7, Reference Braack and de Vos19, Reference Shiferaw31, Reference Blackburn32].

Apart from acquiring B. anthracis from vegetation and soil during feeding, it is suspected that the behaviour of wildlife associated with caring for the sick and dying may lead to exposure [Reference McComb, Baker and Moss33, Reference Goodall34]. Certain herbivore species, including buffaloes, tend to sniff and lick carcasses of their own species, increasing the chance of ingesting or inhaling anthrax spores. This mechanism may have played a major role during an anthrax outbreak in Lake Nakuru National Park in 2015 where >750 buffalos, constituting 17% of the species population at that national park died of anthrax in one outbreak [Reference Muturi12]. Some studies have also suggested that certain B. anthracis strains may have a higher predilection and/or virulence towards certain host species [Reference Hugh-Jones and de Vos23]. This is noteworthy considering that few genotypic studies of B. anthracis have been carried out in sub-Saharan Africa [Reference Smith35].

This study had some limitations. Isolated anthrax deaths in wildlife may go undetected because of quick action of scavengers to clear the carcass, and because the outbreak occurred in remote inaccessible locations. Molecular methods were not used to confirm the presence of B. anthracis; therefore, it is possible that microscopy may have misidentified other Bacillus spp (e.g. B. cereus biovar anthracis) as B. anthracis. However, no other Bacillus spp has been associated with widespread die-offs in mammals nor reported as a contaminant in blood in characteristically large numbers in anthrax deaths in Kenya to invalidate the conclusions.

Buffaloes (23.5%), black rhinos (21.6%) and elephants (17.6%) were the most frequently affected species. Our findings demonstrate the extensive geographic distribution of wildlife anthrax in the country, making it one of the important infectious diseases that threaten wildlife conservation.

In conclusion, our findings reveal the widespread geographic distribution of wildlife anthrax in Kenya, mostly affecting the large mammals important in conservation efforts. These findings underscore the need for greater empirical attention consisting of better wildlife disease surveillance and research, perhaps seasonally focused, for early detection of anthrax and control programmes.

Acknowledgements

We thank the Kenya Wildlife Service staff that assisted in availing annual reports, specific case reports, surveillance reports and post-mortem reports. We are also grateful to Grace Chege who abstracted data into the study database. Funding for the project was provided by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) Grant/Award #: HDTRA11710043.

Conflict of interest

None.

Disclaimer

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

References

1.Belant, JL and Deese, AR (2010) Importance of wildlife disease surveillance. Human-Wildlife Interactions 4, 165169.Google Scholar
2.Grogan, LF et al. (2014) Surveillance for emerging biodiversity diseases of wildlife. PLoS Pathogens 10, e1004015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Katz, RL et al. (2014) Global health security agenda and the international health regulations: moving forward. Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice, and Science 12, 231238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Ryser-Degiorgis, M-P (2013) Wildlife health investigations: needs, challenges and recommendations. BMC Veterinary Research 9, 223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Leendertz, FH et al. (2004) Anthrax kills wild chimpanzees in a tropical rainforest. Nature 430, 451452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Turnbull, PC et al. (1991) Anthrax in wildlife in the Luangwa Valley, Zambia. The Veterinary Record 128, 399403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Clegg, SB et al. (2007) Massive outbreak of anthrax in wildlife in the Malilangwe Wildlife Reserve, Zimbabwe. Veterinary Record 160, 113118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Hoffmann, C et al. (2017) Persistent anthrax as a major driver of wildlife mortality in a tropical rainforest. Nature 548, 8288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Salb, A et al. (2014) Descriptive epidemiology of detected anthrax outbreaks in wild wood bison (Bison athabascae) in northern Canada, 1962–2008. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 50, 459468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Okello, MM et al. (2016) Population density of elephants and other key large herbivores in the Amboseli ecosystem of Kenya in relation to droughts. Journal of Arid Environments 135, 6474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Hopcraft, JGC et al. (2015) In Sinclair, ARE, Metzger, KL, Mduma, SAR and Fryxell, JM (eds.), Serengeti IV: Sustaining Biodiversity in A Coupled Human – Natural System. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
12.Muturi, M et al. (2018) Recurrent anthrax outbreaks in humans, livestock, and wildlife in the same locality, Kenya, 2014–2017. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 99, 17. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Mbabu, M et al. (2014) Establishing a One Health office in Kenya. Pan African Medical Journal 19, 106. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2014.19.106.4588.Google ScholarPubMed
14.Public Health England (2015) Staining procedures. UK Standards for Microbiology Investigations. TP 39 Issue 2.1. Available at https://www.gov.uk/uk-standards-for-microbiology-investigations-smi-quality-and-consistency-in-clinical-laboratories.Google Scholar
15.QGIS Development Team (2018) QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation. Available at http://qgis.org.Google Scholar
16.Turner, WC et al. (2013) Soil ingestion, nutrition and the seasonality of anthrax in herbivores of Etosha National Park. Ecosphere (Washington, DC) 4, 13.Google Scholar
17.De Vos, V and Turnbull, PCB (2004) Anthrax. In Coetzer, JAWT and Tustin, RC (eds), Infectious Diseases of Livestock. Southern Africa: Oxford University Press, vol. 3, pp. 17881818.Google Scholar
18.De Vos, V (1990) The ecology of anthrax in the Kruger National Park, South Africa. Salisbury Medical Review (Supplement) 68, 1923.Google Scholar
19.Braack, LE and de Vos, V (1990) Feeding habits and flight range of blow-flies (Chrysomyia spp.) in relation to anthrax transmission in the Kruger/National Park, South Africa. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research 57, 141142.Google ScholarPubMed
20.Broughton, E (1987) Diseases affecting bison. In Reynolds, HW and Hawley, AWL (eds), Bison Ecology in Relation to Agricultural Development in the Slave River Lowlands, NWT. Occasional Paper 63. Edmonton, Alberta: Canadian Wildlife Service, pp. 3438.Google Scholar
21.Mwakapenje, ER et al. (2018) Anthrax outbreaks in the humans – livestock and wildlife interface areas of Northern Tanzania: a retrospective record review 2006–2016. BMC Public Health 18, 106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Ayotte, JB et al. (2006) Chemical composition of lick soils: functions of soil ingestion by four ungulate species. Journal of Mammalogy 87, 878888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Hugh-Jones, ME and de Vos, V (2002) Anthrax and wildlife. Revue Scientifique et Technique-Office International des Epizooties 21, 359383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Bengis, RG (2012) Anthrax in free-ranging wildlife. In Miller, RE and Fowler, M (eds), Fowler's zoo and Wild Animal Medicine: Current Therapy. St Louis, Missouri: Elsevier Saunders Press, vol. 7, pp. 98107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Starr, JR (1988) Weather, Climate and Animal Performance, Technical Note No. 190. Geneva, Switzerland: World Meteorological Organization.Google Scholar
26.Palmer, AR, Peel, M and Kerley, G (2006) Arid and semiarid rangeland production systems of Southern Africa: wildlife. Sécheresse 17, 362370.Google Scholar
27.Kreuter, UP and Workman, JP (1997) Comparative profitability of cattle and wildlife ranches in semi-arid Zimbabwe. Journal of Arid Environments 35, 171187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Lembo, T et al. (2011) Serologic surveillance of anthrax in the Serengeti ecosystem, Tanzania, 1996–2009. Emerging Infectious Diseases 17, 387394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29.Cormack-Gates, C, Elkin, B and Dragon, D. (2001) Anthrax. In Williams, ES and Barker, IK (eds), Infectious Diseases of Wild Mammals, 3rd Edn. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press, pp. 396412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30.Hassim, A et al. (2017) A retrospective study of anthrax on the Ghaap plateau, Northern Cape province of South Africa, with special reference to the 2007–2008 outbreaks. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research 84, a1414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31.Shiferaw, F et al. (2002) Anthrax outbreak in Mago national park, southern Ethiopia. Veterinary Record 150, 318320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32.Blackburn, J et al. (2010) Confirmation of Bacillus anthracis from flesh-eating flies collected during a West Texas anthrax season. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 46, 918922.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33.McComb, K, Baker, L and Moss, CJ (2006) African elephants show high levels of interest in the skulls and ivory of their own species. Biological Letters 2, 2628.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34.Goodall, J. (1986) The Chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of Behavior. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, p. 674.Google Scholar
35.Smith, KL et al. (2000) Bacillus anthracis diversity in Kruger national park. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 38, 37803784.Google ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Map of Kenya showing the eight administrative wildlife conservation regions (shaded in different colours) and the conservation areas (red hexagons) where the 51 anthrax outbreaks were reported during 1999–2017. NP refers to national park, NR refers to national reserve.

Figure 1

Table 1. Distribution of anthrax outbreaks and mortalities by conservation area, county and agro-ecological zone

Figure 2

Table 2. Frequency of wildlife species involvement in the anthrax outbreaks and the species food niche

Figure 3

Fig. 2. Three-yearly rolling average of anthrax outbreaks in Kenyan wildlife, 1999–2017.

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Monthly distribution of anthrax outbreaks in Kenyan wildlife between 1999 and 2017.

You have Access
Open access
1
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Temporal and spatial distribution of anthrax outbreaks among Kenyan wildlife, 1999–2017
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Temporal and spatial distribution of anthrax outbreaks among Kenyan wildlife, 1999–2017
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Temporal and spatial distribution of anthrax outbreaks among Kenyan wildlife, 1999–2017
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *