Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T12:09:30.326Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A prolonged outbreak of ornithosis in duck processors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

C. P. ST. J. Newman
Affiliation:
Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre, Public Health Laboratory Service, Colindale Avenue, London N.W.9
S. R. Palmer
Affiliation:
Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre (Welsh Unit), Public Health Laboratory Service, Cardiff Royal Infirmary, Cardiff.
F. D. Kirby
Affiliation:
Welsh Office Agriculture Department, Veterinary Investigation Centre, Aberystwyth.
E. O. Caul
Affiliation:
Regional Public Health Laboratory, Public Health Laboratory Service, Bristol.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In 1985 an outbreak of ornithosis affected 13 of 80 (16%) workers in a duck-processing plant. New employees were three times more likely to become cases than established employees. The highest attack rate was in those on the production line. Following the outbreak, an occupational health scheme was set up to monitor the health of new recruits to the company. Serological evidence of recent infection was demonstrated in 18 of 37 (49%) new employees tested in the first 3 months of employment. Five (14%) also had clinical evidence of ornithosis. Veterinary investigation of the ducks demonstrated a high proportion with asymptomatic chlamydial infection. It is suggested that ornithosis may be more common in duck processors than ins processors than is currently supposed. Strategies to reduce occupational risks are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

References

REFERENCES

1.Andrews, BE, Major, R, Palmer, SR. Ornithosis in poultry workers. Lancet 1981; I: 632–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Palmer, SR, Andrews, BE, Major, R. A common-source out break of ornithosis in veterinary surgeons. Lancet 1981; II: 798800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Department of Social Security. Social Security Act 1975: Chlamydiosis and Q fever. Cm. 742. London: HMSO 1988.Google Scholar
4.Chalmers, WSK, Farmer, H, Woolcock, PR. Duck hepatitis virus and Chlamydia psittaci outbreak. Vet Rec 1985; 116: 223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Christie, AB. Infectious diseases: epidemiology and clinical practice, 3rd ed.Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1980: 813–23.Google Scholar
6.Nagington, J. Psittacosis ornithosis in Cambridgeshire. J Hyg 1984; 92: 919.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Bracewell, CD, Bevan, BJ. Chlamydiosis in birds in Great Britain. J Hyg 1986; 96: 447–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Jawetz, E, Melnick, JL, Adelberg, EA, Borrks, GF, Butel, JS, Ornston, LN. Medical microbiology, 18th ed.London: Prentice Hall International (UK) Ltd., 1989, 286–93.Google Scholar
9.Hedberg, K, White, KE, Forfang, JC et al. , An out break of psittacosis in Minnesota turkey industry workers: implications for modes of transmission and control. Am J Epidemiol 1989; 130: 569–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Anderson, DC, Stoesz, PA, Kaufamann, AF. Psittacosis in employees of a turkey-processing plant. Am J Epidemiol 1978; 107: 140–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Palmer, SR. Psittacosis in man-recent developments in the UK: A review. J Roy Soc Med 1982; 75: 262–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Cartwright, KAV, Caul, EO, Lamb, RW. Symptomatic Chlamydia psittaci reinfection. Lancet 1988; I: 1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Newman, JA. Chlamydia spp. infection in turkey flocks in Minnesota. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1989; 195: 1528–30.Google ScholarPubMed
14.Benenson, AS. Control of communicable diseases in man, 15th ed.Washington, DC: American Public Health Association, 1990: 347–9.Google Scholar