Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T04:54:18.246Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prevention of hepatitis B in Italy: lessons from surveillance of type-specific acute viral hepatitis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

A. Mele
Affiliation:
Instituto Superiore di SanitàDept. of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Viale Regina Elena 299 - 00161 Rome, Italy
M. A. Stazi
Affiliation:
Instituto Superiore di SanitàDept. of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Viale Regina Elena 299 - 00161 Rome, Italy
O. N. Gill
Affiliation:
PHLS Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre, London, UK
P. Pasquini
Affiliation:
Instituto Superiore di SanitàDept. of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Viale Regina Elena 299 - 00161 Rome, Italy
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The relative contribution of various risk factors to the incidence of acute hepatitis B in Italy was estimated using a special surveillance system (SEIEVA) for type-specific acute viral hepatitis. At present 146 health departments (USLs) which contain 21% of the Italian population participate in SEIEVA out of the total of 650. Data on 2460 hepatitis B cases and 708 hepatitis A cases were compared.

Hospitalization, surgical intervention, dental therapy, other percutaneous exposures, barber shop shaving, i.v. drug abuse and household contact with HBsAg carriers were associated with acute hepatitis B and a large number of cases were attributable to these risk factors.

Because the control programme based on vaccination will not be effective in the short term at reducing hepatitis B incidence, other additional interventions are recommended.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

References

REFERENCES

1.Dardanoni, L, Mele, A. & Polizzi, MC.Epidemiology of hepatitis B in Italy. Annali dell'istituto Superiore di Sanità 1988; 24: 235–44.Google Scholar
2.Mele, A, et al. , Integrated epidemiological system for acute viral hepatitis in Italy (SEIEVA): description and preliminary results. Europ J Epidemiol 1986; 2: 300–4.Google Scholar
3.Mele, A, et al. , L'epatite virale acuta in Italia: risultati 1986 del Sistema Epidemiologico Integrato di Sorveglianza (SEIEVA). L'Igiene Moderna 1987; 88: 284–95.Google Scholar
4.Mele, A, et al. , SEIEVA. Sistema Epidemiologico Integrato dell'epatite Virale Acuta. Rapporto Annuale 1987. Roma, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rapporto no. 13. 1988.Google Scholar
5.Stroffolini, T, et al. , A nationwide vaccination program in Italy against hepatitis B virus infection in infants of hepatitis B surface antigen-carrier mothers. Vaccine 1989; 7: 152–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Schlesselman, JJ. Case-control studies. Design conduct, analysis. Monographs in Epidemiology and Biostatistics. 1982. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 43–4.Google Scholar
7.Istituto Centrale di Statistica. Annuario di Statistica Sanitaria. Roma, vol. XXV (Ed. 1980), p. 28. 1984.Google Scholar
8.Istituto Centrale di Statistica. Annuario di Statistica Sanitaria. Roma, vol. XXV (Ed. 1980), p. 24. 1984.Google Scholar
9.Istituto Centrale di Statistica. Statistiche Sanitarie. Roma, vol. XXVII, p. 27. 1986.Google Scholar
10.Avico, U, et al. , L'uso degli indicatori nellľepidemiologia delle tossicodipendenze in Italia. Roma, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rapporto no. 8. 1987.Google Scholar
11.Pasquini, P, et al. , Distribuzione degli anticorpi anti-HAV nel personale di due ospedali della regione Lazio. Annali Sclavo 1982; 24: 123–8.Google Scholar
12.Zanetti, AR, Ferroni, P.Prevalence of antibody to hepatitis A virus in Healthy individuals of Milan. Bollettino dellľIstituto Sieroterapico Milanese 1978; 57: 523–7.Google ScholarPubMed
13.Pasquini, P, et al. , Impact of hepatitis B immunization strategies on infection rates in Italy: a deterministic computer simulation. Europ J Epidemiol 1987; 3: 19–24.Google Scholar