Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T08:52:38.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Bacterial Flora of Diphtheria Carriers, Diphtheria Patients, and Normal School Children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

William Clunie Harvey
Affiliation:
(Late Assistant Bacteriologist, Northern Group Laboratory, North-Eastern Hospital, Metropolitan Asylums Board.)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

During a recent investigation on the carrier problem as it occurs in diphtheria, which was carried out (under the auspices of the Scientific Advisory Committee of the Metropolitan Asylums Board) at the Northern Group Laboratory, North-Eastern Hospital, one of the first subjects considered was that of the bacterial flora of the carriers under examination, and of an adequate series of controls. It was suggested that possibly the flora of the carriers might differ (apart altogether from the presence of the Klebs-Loeffler bacillus) from that found in non-carrier persons of the same age. It was thought that some pathogenic organism might be found to be constantly present in the nose or throat flora of carriers and not in controls, and that this might be exerting an influence on the Klebs-Loeffler bacillus by allowing it to survive in the infected region for prolonged periods. If such were the case it was hoped that an elimination of the organism or organisms concerned would go a long way towards clearing up the carrier condition.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1928

References

REFERENCES

Bloomfield, (1921). Johns Hopkins Hosp. Bull. 32, 360.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, (1922). Johns Hopkins Hosp. Bull. 33, 145.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, (1921 a). Amer. Rev. of Tuberculosis, 4, 11.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, (1922 a). Amer. Rev. of Tuberculosis, 5, 11.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, (1922 b). Amer. J. Med. Sci. 164, 854.Google Scholar
Mair, (1917). Biochem. J. 11, 1.Google Scholar
Mair, (1917 a). J. Path. and Bact. 21, 305.Google Scholar
Harvey, (1928). Lancet, ii, 58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCartney, and Harvey, (1928 a). Proc. Roy. Soc. Med. Lond. p. 845.Google Scholar