Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T00:34:39.848Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

COMMENTARY: Using Test Communities to Demonstrate Household Waste Separation Procedures in Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2009

Manfred Fehr ,
Kally Alves de Sousa ,
Mirlaine Queiroz Santos  and
Max Maciel de Oliveira e Domingues
Manfred Fehr*
Affiliation:
Federal University at Uberlândia, Brazil
Kally Alves de Sousa
Affiliation:
Federal University at Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Mirlaine Queiroz Santos
Affiliation:
Federal University at Uberlândia, Brazil
Max Maciel de Oliveira e Domingues
Affiliation:
State University of São Paulo at Campinas, Brazil
*
Address correspondence to: Manfred Fehr, Federal University at Uberlandia, PO Box 811, 38400974 Uberlandia MG, Brazil; (email)prosec22@yahoo.com
Get access

Abstract

Through source separation of biodegradable material, the Divided Waste Processing model, developed by the authors in Brazil, has the potential of diverting up to 85% of domestic waste away from landfills. Because a maximum diversion using traditional models of selective collection stands at 15%, the value put forward here introduces a new paradigm for consideration by municipal administrations. The success of divided processing of biodegradable and inert material depends on satisfactory source separation, which was demonstrated in residential sectors, condominium buildings, and grade schools. The destinations of biodegradable material were animal feed and compost; the composting operation was carried out in the neighborhoods of the test communities and can be accompanied by the residents. The inert material was disposed of by professional waste retailers. The long-term success of the source-separation procedure depends upon constant monitoring. In one of the test communities, the procedure continues to be operational after six years and diverts 67% of the community's waste from the landfill. The model is available for imitation in other test communities around the same city, until the extrapolation to larger sectors—through the application of appropriate managerial strategies—can be accomplished. Several possible strategies are discussed. Outside Brazil, the application will depend on local situations.

Environmental Practice 11:25–31 (2009)

Type
FEATURES
Information
Environmental Practice , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , March 2009 , pp. 25 - 31
Copyright
Copyright © National Association of Environmental Professionals 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bench, M. L., Woodard, R., Harder, M. K., and Stantzos, N.. 2005. Waste Minimisation: Home Digestion Trials of Biodegradable Waste. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 45(1):84–94.Google Scholar
Castaldi, P., Alberti, G., Merella, R., and Melis, P.. 2005. Study of the Organic Matter Evolution during Municipal Solid Waste Composting Aimed at Identifying Suitable Parameters for the Evaluation of Compost Maturity. Waste Management 25(2):209–213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fehr, M. 1999. The Dynamic Nature of MSW Management. Journal of Environmental Systems 27(1):1–13. Also available at http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?id=dfne8avgjtw5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, M., and Calçado, M. R.. 2001. Divided Collection Model for Household Waste Achieves 80% Landfill Diversion. Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management 27(1):22–26. Also available at http://www2.widener.edu/~sxw0004/abstracts.html.Google Scholar
Lima, J. S., Queiroz, J. E. G., and Freitas, H. B.. 2004. Effect of Selected and Non-Selected Urban Compost on the Initial Growth of Corn. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 42(4):309–315.Google Scholar
Ministry of Housing. 2001. Fact Sheet on Household Waste in the Netherlands. Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment, Netherlands, June. Available at http://www.sharedspaces.nl/docs/internationaal/14273_174Householdwaste.pdf.Google Scholar
Mosler, H. J., Drescher, S., Zurbrügg, C., Rodríguez, T. C., and Miranda, O. G.. 2006. Formulating Waste Management Strategies Based on Waste Management Practices of Households in Santiago de Cuba. Habitat International 30(4):849–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purandare, A., and Purandare, J.. 2004. MSW Handling in India: Special Reference to Pune City. Waste Management and the Environment II, Wessex Institute of Technology, p. 501–509. Also available at http://library.witpress.com/pages/PaperInfo.asp?PaperID=14402.Google Scholar
Rees, W. E., and Wackernagel, M.. 1996. Urban Ecological Footprints: Why Cities Cannot Be Sustainable. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 16(4–6):223–248.Google Scholar
Seo, J. Y., Heo, J. S., Kim, T. H., Joo, W. H., and Crohn, D. M.. 2004. Effect of Vermiculite Addition on Compost Produced from Korean Food Wastes. Waste Management 24(10):981–987.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sivramkrishna, S. 2003. The Urban Solid Waste Management Problem in India: An Economic Approach and Framework for Policy. Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management 29(1):8–23.Google Scholar
Wells, C. 1997. Recycling Notebook Number 6: Composting (in Portuguese). CEMPRE Brazilian Business Commitment for Recycling, São Paulo. Available at http://www.cempre.org.br/english/index.php.Google Scholar
Zurbrügg, C., Drescher, S., Rytz, I., Sinha, A. H. M. M., and Enayetullah, I.. 2005. Decentralised Composting in Bangladesh: A Win-Win Situation for All Stakeholders. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 43(3):281–292.Google Scholar