Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T17:06:22.869Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Mac Sharry Plan and integration of EU policy on agriculture and nature conservation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2009

Kees J. Canters
Affiliation:
Centre of Environmental Science (CML), Leiden University, P.O. Box 9518, NL-2300 RA LEIDEN, The Netherlands, Fax: +31 71 5275611;, e-mail: canters@rulcml.leidenuniv.nl

Extract

Over the past few decades the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) of the European Union (EU) has resulted in major surpluses of agricultural products. However, it has also resulted in severe environmental pollution and degradation. For these reasons, in the early 1990s, the CAP was reformed by means of the Mac Sharry Plan (MSP) (Commission of the EC 1991). This Plan aims to: 1) reduce agricultural surpluses and expenses, 2) adopt a more market-oriented approach, 3) keep a sufficient number of farmers in the countryside, and 4) render agriculture more benign to nature and the environment. The last of these aims has not yet been adequately elaborated in the MSP and it is uncertain whether the adopted measures will really lead to less agricultural pressure on nature and the environment.

Type
Comment
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon. (1992 a) Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora. Official Journal of the European Communities 35 (L 206): 750.Google Scholar
Anon. (1992 b) Council Regulation (EEC) No 1765/92 of 30 June 1992 establishing a support system for producers of certain arable crops. Official Journal of the European Communities 35 (L 181): 1220.Google Scholar
Anon. (1992 c) Council Regulation (EEC) No 2066/92 of 30 June 1992, amending regulation (EEC) No 805/68 on the common organisations of the market in beef and veal, repealing Regulation (EEC) No 468/87, laying down general rules applying to the special premium for beef producers and Regulation (EEC) No 1357/80, introducing a system of premiums for maintaining suckler cows. Official Journal of the European Communities 35 (L 215): 4956.Google Scholar
Anon. (1992 d) Council Regulation (EEC) No 2078/92 of 30 June 1992 on agricultural production methods compatible with the requirements of the protection of the environment and the maintenance of the countryside. Official Journal of the European Communities 35 (L 215): 8590.Google Scholar
Anon. (1992 e) Council Regulation (EEC) No 2079/92 of 30 June 1992 instituting a Community aid scheme for the early retirement from farming. Official Journal of the European Communities 35 (L 215): 91–5.Google Scholar
Anon. (1992 f) Council Regulation (EEC) No 2080/92 of 30 June 1992 instituting a Community aid scheme for forestry measures in agriculture. Official Journal of the European Communities 35 (L 215): 96–9.Google Scholar
Bennett, G., ed. (1991) Towards a European Ecological Network, EECONET. The Institute for European Environmental Policy, Arnhem, The Netherlands: 80 pp.Google Scholar
Bertels, J., Bos, M., Haan, E., van Hoof, J.P.M., Logger, A. & Vinkestijn, F.M. (1993) Het Plan Mac Sharry: kansen voor de Europese natuur? (The Mac Sharry Plan: chances for European nature?) UBM Study Report 1993/2. Universitaire Beroepsopleiding Milieukunde, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: xvi + 161 pp.Google Scholar
Bischoff, N.T. & Jongman, R.H.G. (1993) Development of rural areas in Europe: the claim for nature. Netherlands Scientific Council for Government Policy, Preliminary and Background Studies V79: 206 pp.Google Scholar
Commission of the EC (1991) Development and future of the Common Agricultural Policy. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg COM(91) 258 def: 43 pp.Google Scholar