Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T15:19:30.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

English what with absolute constructions: a Construction Grammar perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 July 2019

JONG-BOK KIM Open the ORCID record for JONG-BOK KIM [Opens in a new window]  and
MARK DAVIES
JONG-BOK KIM
Affiliation:
Department of English Linguistics and Literature, Kyung Hee University, 26 Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 130.701, Korea jongbok@khu.ac.kr
MARK DAVIES
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics and English Language, Brigham Young University, ProvoUT84602, USAmarkdavies@byu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There are several types of absolute constructions (acs) in English. Among these, this article investigates the so-called what-with ac, which has not received much attention in the study of English grammar. This article considers the grammatical properties of the construction from a synchronic as well as a diachronic perspective, using much more representative and robust corpora than previous studies. Based on corpus data drawn from historical corpora such as COHA (Corpus of Historical American English, 400 million words), the article addresses questions about changes in the construction's syntactic, semantic and pragmatic properties. In addition, the article provides a Construction Grammar perspective, which supports previous research in arguing that the construction is undergoing the processes of grammatical constructionalization.

Keywords

absolute constructioncorpusConstruction Grammargrammaticalization
Type
Research Article
Information
English Language & Linguistics , Volume 24 , Issue 4 , December 2020 , pp. 637 - 666
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Earlier versions of this article were presented at the American Association for Corpus Linguistics Conference at Iowa State University, 17 September 2016, and at the 7th Biennial International Conference on the Linguistics of Contemporary English, at University of Vigo, 29 September 2017. We thank audiences of the conferences for questions and feedback. Our thanks also go to Anne Abeillé, Bert Cappelle, Adele Goldberg, Jungsoo Kim, Okgi Kim, Laura Michaeli and Rok Sim for comments and suggestions at various stages in the development of this article. This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2014S1A2A2028437).

References

Barðdal, Jóhanna, Smirnova, Elena, Sommerer, Lotte & Gildea, Spike. 2015. Diachronic Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny. 2007. Discourse variation, grammaticalisation and stuff like that. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11(2), 155–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding: The Pisa lectures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2005. Logical and typological arguments for radical Construction Grammar. In Östman, Jan-Ola & Fried, Mirjam (eds.), Construction Grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions, 273–314. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2008–. The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 560 million words, 1990–present (COCA). Available online at www.english-corpora.org/coca/Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2010–. The Corpus of Historical American English: 400 million words, 1810–2009 (COHA). Available online at www.english-corpora.org/coha/Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2017. Early English Books Online. Part of the SAMUELS project. Available online at www.english-corpora.org/eebo/Google Scholar
Felser, Claudia & Britain, David. 2007. Deconstructing what with absolutes. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics 53, 97–134. Colchester: University of Essex.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J., Kay, Paul & O'Connor, Mary C.. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language 64(3), 501–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fried, Mirjam. 2009. Construction Grammar as a tool for diachronic analysis. Constructions and Frames 1, 261–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geney, Hideaki. 1994. What with construction. English Linguistics 11, 55–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginzburg, Jonathan & Sag, Ivan A.. 2000. Interrogative investigations: The form, meaning and use of English interrogatives. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 2003. Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(5), 219–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at work: On the nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin. 2013. Constructional change in English. Developments in allomorphy, word formation, and syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, Martin. 2014. Construction Grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K.. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishihara, Roberta L. 1982. A study of absolute phrases in English within the Government Binding framework. PhD dissertation, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Kim, Jong-Bok. 2016. The syntactic structures of Korean: A Construction Grammar perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Jong-Bok & Sag, Ivan A.. 2005. English object extraposition: A constraint-based approach. In Müller, Stefan (ed.), Proceedings of the HPSG05 Conference, 192–212. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Kim, Jong-Bok & Sells, Peter. 2011. The big mess construction: Interactions between the lexicon and constructions. English Language and Linguistics 15, 335–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd. 1991. Free adjuncts and absolutes in English: Problems of control and interpretation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 2011. Grammaticalization and Cognitive Grammar. In Heine, Bernd & Narrog, Heiko (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 1–9. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McCawley, James K. 1983. What's with with? Language 59, 271–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, Laura A. 2013. Sign-Based Construction Grammar. In Hoffman, Thomas & Trousdale, Graeme (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 133–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Overstreet, Maryann. 1999. Whales, candlelight and stuff like that: General extenders in English discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Partington, Alan. 1998. Patterns and meanings: Using corpora for English language research and teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Riehemann, Susan & Bender, Emily. 1999. Absolute constructions: On the distribution of predicative idioms. In Bird, Sonya, Carnie, Andrew, Haugen, Jason D. & Norquest, Peter (eds.), Proceedings of WCCFL 18, 467–89. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Sag, Ivan A. 2012. Sign-based Construction Grammar: An informal synopsis. In Boas, Hans & Sag, Ivan (eds.), Sign-based Construction Grammar, 69–202. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Stump, Gregory. 1985. The semantic variability of absolute constructions. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todorova, Nadezhda P. 2013. Types of absolute constructions in modern English. British and American Studies 19, 183–92.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2008. Grammaticalization, constructions and the incremental development of language: Suggestions from the development of Degree Modifiers in English. In Eckardt, Regine, Jäger, Gerhard & Veenstra, Tonjes (eds.), Variation, selection, development: Probing the evolutionary model of language change, 219–50. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2010. Grammaticalization. In Luraghi, Silvia & Bubenik, Vit (eds.), A companion to historical linguistics, 269–83. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme. 2010. Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization: How do they intersect. In Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Trousdale, Graeme (eds.), Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization, 19–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme. 2013. Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trousdale, Graeme. 2008. Constructions in grammaticalization and lexicalization: Evidence from the history of a composite predicate construction in English. In Trousdale, Graeme & Gisborne, Nikolas (eds.), Constructional explanations in English grammar, 33–67. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Trousdale, Graeme. 2012. Theory and data in diachronic Construction Grammar: The case of the what with construction. Studies in Language 36(3), 576–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van de Pol, Nikki & Cuyckens, Hubert. 2013. Gradualness in change in English augmented absolutes. In Giacalone, Anna Ramat, Caterina Mauri & Molinelli, Piera (eds.), Synchrony and diachrony: A dynamic interface, 341–65. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van de Pol, Nikki & Hoffmann, Thomas. 2016. With or without with: The constructionalization of the with-augmented absolute in English. Journal of English Linguistics 44(4), 318–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Eynde, Frank. 2007. The big mess construction. In Müller, Stefan (ed.), Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, 415–33. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar