Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T00:09:12.651Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Alex Ho-Cheong Leung and Wim van der Wurff (eds.), The noun phrase in English: Past and present (Linguistik Aktuell Linguistics Today 246). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2018. Pp. 229. ISBN 9789027200723.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Tine Breban
Tine Breban*
Affiliation:
School of Arts, Languages and Cultures, The University of Manchester, Oxford Rd, ManchesterM13 9PLUKtine.breban@manchester.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
English Language & Linguistics , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , June 2021 , pp. 418 - 424
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamson, Sylvia. 2000. A lovely little example: Word order options and category shift in the premodifying string. In Fischer, Olga, Rosenbach, Anette & Stein, Dieter (eds.), Pathways of change, 39–66. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feist, Jim. 2012. Premodifiers in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Postma, Gertjan. 2010. The impact of failed changes. In Lucas, Christopher, Watts, Sheila, Breitbarth, Anne & Willis, David (eds.), Continuity and change in grammar, 296–302. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Vandewinkel, Sigi & Davidse, Kristin. 2008. The interlocking paths of development towards emphasizer adjective pure. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 9, 255–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar