Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-544b6db54f-vq995 Total loading time: 0.202 Render date: 2021-10-19T13:39:20.940Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

CAPITAL WITHOUT WAGE-LABOUR: MARX’S MODES OF SUBSUMPTION REVISITED

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 December 2017

Nicholas Vrousalis*
Affiliation:
Institute of Political Science, Leiden University, Wassenaarseweg 52, 2333AK Leiden, the Netherlands. Email: n.vrousalis@fsw.leidenuniv.nl

Abstract:

This paper argues that capitalist social relations do not presuppose wage-labour. The paper defends a functional definition of the capitalist relations of production, in terms of what Marx calls the ’subsumption of labour by capital’. I argue that there are at least four modes of subsumption, one transitional to and one transitional from the capitalist mode of production. Unlike the capitalist mode of production, capitalist relations of production are compatible with the absence of a labour market, and even with the absence of workplace authority relations. The ambit of capitalist domination is therefore broader than typically thought.

Type
Symposium Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Banaji, J. 1975. India and the colonial mode of production: comment. Economic and Political Weekly 10 (49): 18871889, 1891–1892.Google Scholar
Banaji, J. 2010. Theory as History. London: Haymarket Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhandari, R. 2008. The disguises of wage-labour: juridical illusions, unfree conditions and novel extensions. Historical Materialism 16: 7199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenner, R. 1976. Agrarian class structure and economic development in pre-industrial Europe. Past and Present 70: 3075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenner, R. 1977. The origins of capitalist development: a critique of Neo-Smithian Marxism. New Left Review 104: 2592.Google Scholar
Byres, T. 2006. Differentiation of the peasantry under feudalism and the transition to capitalism. Journal of Agrarian Change 6: 1768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callinicos, A. 2014. Deciphering Capital. London: Bookmarks.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. 2000. Karl Marx's Theory of History: A Defence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
DiQuattro, A. 2007. The labor theory of value and simple commodity production. Science and Society 71: 455483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, R. 2000. Sovereign Virtue. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ellerman, D. 2007. On the role of capital in ‘capitalist’ and in labor-managed firms. Review of Radical Political Economics 39: 526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, B. and Saad-Filho, M.. 2004. Marx's Capital. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Harvey, D. 2010. A Companion to Marx's Capital. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Howard, M. C. and King, J. E.. 1975. The Political Economy of Marx. London: Longman Publishers.Google Scholar
Jossa, B. 2012. Cooperative firms as a new mode of production. Review of Political Economy 24: 399416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebowitz, M. 2010. The Socialist Alternative. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Mandel, E. 1974. An Introduction to Marxist Economic Theory. London: Pathfinder Press.Google Scholar
Marglin, S. 1974. What do bosses do?' Review of Radical Political Economics 6: 60112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, K. 1969. Theories of Surplus Value, Volume 1. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
Marx, K. 1972. Theories of Surplus Value, Volume 3. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
Marx, K. 1973. Grundrisse. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Marx, K. 1976. Capital, Volume 1. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Marx, K. 1981. Capital, Volume 3. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Marx, K. and Engels, F.. 1962. Werke, Volume 23. Berlin: Dietz Verlag.Google Scholar
Marx, K. and Engels, F.. 1988. Collected Works, Volume 30. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
Marx, K. and Engels, F.. 1989. Collected Works, Volume 32. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
Marx, K. and Engels, F.. 1994. Collected Works, Volume 34. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
Marx, K. and Engels, F.. 2002. The Communist Manifesto, ed. Stedman-Jones, G.. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Murray, P. 2004. The social and material transformation of production by capital. In The Constitution of Capital, ed. Bellofiore, R. and Taylor, N.. New York, NY: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, S. 2008. Protoindustrialization. In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics (2nd edn), ed. Durlauf, S. and Blume, E.. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Post, C. 2011. The American Road to Capitalism. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Post, C. 2013. Capitalism, laws of motion and social relations of production. Historical Materialism 21: 7191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajan, R. and Zingales, L.. 2001. The firm as a dedicated hierarchy. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116: 805851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roemer, J. 1982. A General Theory of Exploitation and Class. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roemer, J. 1988. Free to Lose. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Roemer, J. 1996. Egalitarian Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schweickart, D. 1996. Against Capitalism. London: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Schweickart, D. 2011. After Capitalism (2nd edn). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Skillman, G. 1996. Marxian value theory and the labor-labor power distinction. Science and Society 60: 427451.Google Scholar
Skillman, G. 1999. Marx's value-theoretic account of capitalist exploitation: non sequitur or tautology? Science and Society 63: 362372.Google Scholar
Skillman, G. 2007. Value theory vs. historical analysis in Marx's account of capitalist exploitation. Science and Society 71: 203226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweezy, P. 1942. The Theory of Capitalist Development. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Vanek, J. 1970. The General Theory of the Labor-Managed Economies. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wertheimer, A. 1996. Exploitation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wolff, R. P. 1985. Understanding Marx. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, E. M. 1999. The Origin of Capitalism. London: Verson.Google Scholar
Wood, E. M. 2002. The question of market dependence. Journal of Agrarian Change 2: 5087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

CAPITAL WITHOUT WAGE-LABOUR: MARX’S MODES OF SUBSUMPTION REVISITED
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

CAPITAL WITHOUT WAGE-LABOUR: MARX’S MODES OF SUBSUMPTION REVISITED
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

CAPITAL WITHOUT WAGE-LABOUR: MARX’S MODES OF SUBSUMPTION REVISITED
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *