Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T11:16:04.212Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

TESTING GOODNESS OF FIT BASED ON DENSITIES OF GARCH INNOVATIONS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2006

Lajos Horváth
Affiliation:
University of Utah
Ričardas Zitikis
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario

Abstract

Testing goodness (or lack) of fit for distributions of observable and nonobservable random variables is one of the main topics in statistics. When they exist, the corresponding density functions and their shapes allow researchers to easily recognize the underlying distribution functions. The present paper is concerned with the densities of (unobservable) generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH) innovations and also with developing goodness-of-fit tests for the densities. Specifically, we construct and investigate large-sample properties of a kernel-type density estimator for GARCH innovations based on (observable) residuals.The authors sincerely thank the Co-Editor Oliver Linton and three anonymous referees for constructive criticism and suggestions that helped us to prepare a much revised version of the original manuscript. The feedback by participants of the Conference on Statistical Models for Financial Data at the University of Graz in May 2004 is also greatly appreciated. The research of the first author was partially supported by NSF grant INT-0223262 and NATO grant PST.EAP.CLG 980599. The research of the second author was partially supported by a Discovery Research Grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bai, J. (1994) Weak convergence of the sequential empirical processes of residuals in ARMA models. Annals of Statistics 22, 20512061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baillie, R.T. & H. Chung (2002) Estimation of GARCH models from the autocorrelations of the squares of a process. Journal of Time Series Analysis 22, 631650.Google Scholar
Beirlant, J. & D.M. Mason (1995) On the asymptotic normality of Lp-norms of empirical functionals. Mathematical Methods of Statistics 4, 119.Google Scholar
Berkes, I. & L. Horváth (2001) Strong approximation of the empirical process of GARCH sequences. Annals of Statistics 11, 789809.Google Scholar
Berkes, I. & L. Horváth (2004) The efficiency of the estimators of the parameters in GARCH processes. Annals of Statistics 32, 633655.Google Scholar
Berkes, I., L. Horváth, & P. Kokoszka (2003) GARCH processes: Structure and estimation. Bernoulli 9, 201227.Google Scholar
Bickel, P. & M. Rosenblatt (1973) On some global measures of the deviations of density function estimates. Annals of Statistics 1, 10711095.Google Scholar
Bollerslev, T. (1986) Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics 31, 307327.Google Scholar
Bougerol, P. & N. Picard (1992a) Strict stationarity of generalized autoregressive processes. Annals of Probability 20, 17141730.Google Scholar
Bougerol, P. & N. Picard (1992b) Stationarity of GARCH processes and of some nonnegative time series. Journal of Econometrics 52, 115127.Google Scholar
Csörgő, M. & L. Horváth (1988) Central limit theorems for Lp-norms of density estimators. Probability Theory and Related Fields 80, 269291.Google Scholar
Dehling, H., T. Mikosch, & M. Sørensen (2002) Empirical Process Techniques for Dependent Data. Birkhäuser.
Devroye, L. (1987) A Course on Density Estimation. Birkhäuser.
Drost, F.C. & C.A. Klaassen (1997) Efficient estimation in semiparametric GARCH models. Journal of Econometrics 81, 193221.Google Scholar
Hall, P. & C.C. Heyde (1980) Martingale Limit Theory and Its Application. Academic Press.
Horváth, L., P. Kokoszka, & G. Teyssière (2001) Empirical process of the squared residuals of an ARCH sequence. Annals of Statistics 29, 445469.Google Scholar
Horváth, L. & F. Liese (2004) Lp-estimators in ARCH models. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 119, 277309.Google Scholar
Horváth, L. & R. Zitikis (2004) Asymptotics of the Lp-norms of density estimators in the first-order autoregressive models. Statistics and Probability Letters 66, 91103.Google Scholar
Koul, H.L. (2002) Weighted Empirical Processes in Dynamic Nonlinear Models. Springer.
Kristensen, D. & A. Rahbek (2003) Asymptotics of the QMLE for a class of ARCH(q) models. Econonometric Theory 21, 946961.Google Scholar
Lai, T.L. & H. Robbins (1976) Maximally dependent random variables. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A. 73, 286288.Google Scholar
Lee, S.W. & B.E. Hansen (1994) Asymptotic theory for the GARCH(1,1) quasi-maximum likelihood estimator. Econometric Theory 10, 2952.Google Scholar
Lee, S. & S. Na (2002) On the Bickel–Rosenblatt test for first-order autoregressive models. Statistics and Probability Letters 56, 2335.Google Scholar
Linton, O. (1993) Adaptive estimation in ARCH models. Econometric Theory 9, 539569.Google Scholar
Lumsdaine, R.L. (1996) Consistency and asymptotic normality of the quasi–maximum likelihood estimator in IGARCH (1,1) and covariance stationary GARCH (1,1) models. Econometrica 64, 575596.Google Scholar
Nelson, D. (1991) Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: A new approach. Econometrica 59, 347370.Google Scholar
Parzen, E. (1962) On estimation of a probability density function and mode. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 33, 10651076.Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, M. (1956) Remarks on some nonparametric estimates of a density function. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 27, 832837.Google Scholar
Shorack, G.R. & J.A. Wellner (1986) Empirical Processes with Applications to Statistics. Wiley.
Silverman, B.W. (1986) Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. Chapman and Hall.
Simonoff, J.S. (1998) Smoothing Methods in Statistics. Springer.