Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T11:32:28.695Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ON STANDARD INFERENCE FOR GMM WITH LOCAL IDENTIFICATION FAILURE OF KNOWN FORMS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2017

Ji Hyung Lee  and
Zhipeng Liao
Ji Hyung Lee*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois
Zhipeng Liao
Affiliation:
UC Los Angeles
*
*Address correspondence to Ji Hyung Lee, Department of Economics, University of Illinois, 1407 W. Gregory Dr., 214 David Kinley Hall, Urbana, IL 61801, USA; e-mail: jihyung@illinois.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper studies the GMM estimation and inference problem that occurs when the Jacobian of the moment conditions is rank deficient of known forms at the true parameter values. Dovonon and Renault (2013) recently raised a local identification issue stemming from this type of degenerate Jacobian. The local identification issue leads to a slow rate of convergence of the GMM estimator and a nonstandard asymptotic distribution of the over-identification test statistics. We show that the known form of rank-deficient Jacobian matrix contains nontrivial information about the economic model. By exploiting such information in estimation, we provide GMM estimator and over-identification tests with standard properties. The main theory developed in this paper is applied to the estimation of and inference about the common conditionally heteroskedastic (CH) features in asset returns. The performances of the newly proposed GMM estimators and over-identification tests are investigated under the similar simulation designs used in Dovonon and Renault (2013).

Type
ARTICLES
Information
Econometric Theory , Volume 34 , Issue 4 , August 2018 , pp. 790 - 814
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We acknowledge useful comments from Don Andrews, Anil Bera, Xu Cheng, Denis Chetverikov, Yanqin Fan, Jonathan Gu, Jinyong Hahn, Guofang Huang, Roger Koenker, Ivana Komunjer, Rosa Matzkin, Peter Phillips, Shuyang Sheng, Ruoyao Shi, Yixiao Sun, and participants in Econometrics seminar at UC Davis, UCLA, UCSD, UIUC, Yale and 2014 Seattle-Vancouver Econometrics Conference. We also thank the Co-Editor, Anna Mikusheva, and two anonymous referees for constructive suggestions which improved this paper through the revision processes. The vast amount of outstanding editorial input by the Editor, Professor Phillips, on our last version of the manuscript is extremely appreciated. Any errors are the responsibility of the authors.

References

REFERENCES

Andrews, D.W.K. & Cheng, X. (2012) Estimation and inference with weak, semi-strong and strong identification. Econometrica 80, 2153–2211.Google Scholar
Antoine, B., Bonnal, H., & Renault, E. (2007) On the efficient use of the informational content of estimating equations: Implied probabilities and euclidean empirical likelihood. Journal of Econometrics 138(2), 461–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antoine, B. & Renault, E. (2017) On the relevance of weaker instruments. Econometric Reviews, 1–18.Google Scholar
Broto, C. & Ruiz, E. (2004) Estimation methods for stochastic volatility models: A survey. Journal of Economic Surveys 18(5), 613–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, I. & Phillips, P.C.B. (1992) Asymptotic and finite sample distribution theory for IV estimators and tests in partially identified structural equations. Journal of Econometrics 51(1), 113–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diebold, F.X. & Nerlove, M. (1989) The dynamics of exchange rate volatility: A multivariate latent factor ARCH model. Journal of Applied Econometrics 4(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dovonon, P. & Goncąlves, S. (2016) Bootstrapping the GMM Overidentification Test Under First-order Underidentification. Working paper, Concordia University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dovonon, P. & Renault, E. (2013) Testing for common conditionally heteroskedastic factors. Econometrica 81(6), 2561–2586.Google Scholar
Doz, C. & Renault, E. (2006) Factor stochastic volatility in mean models: A GMM approach. Econometric Reviews 25(2–3), 275–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichenbaum, M., Hansen, L., & Singleton, K. (1988) A time series analysis of representative agent models of consumption and leisure choice under uncertainty. Quarterly Journal of Economics 103(1), 51–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engle, R.F. & Kozicki, S. (1993) Testing for common features. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 11(4), 369–380.Google Scholar
Engle, R.F., Ng, V.K., & Rothschild, M. (1990) Asset pricing with a factor-ARCH covariance structure: Empirical estimates for treasury bills. Journal of Econometrics 45(1), 213–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fieller, E.C. & Hartley, H.O. (1954) Sampling with control variables. Biometrika 41(3/4), 494–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorentini, G., Sentana, E., & Shephard, N. (2004) Likelihood-based estimation of latent generalized ARCH structures. Econometrica 72(5), 1481–1517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, A.R. (2005) Generalized Methods of Moments. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, L.P. (1982) Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica 50, 1029–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleibergen, F. (2005) Testing parameters in GMM without assuming that they are identified. Econometrica 73(4), 1103–1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newey, W.K. & Smith, R.J. (2004) Higher order properties of GMM and generalized empirical likelihood estimators. Econometrica 72(1), 219–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newey, W.K. & Windmeijer, F. (2009) Generalized method of moments with many weak moment conditions. Econometrica 77(3), 687–719.Google Scholar
Phillips, P.C.B. (1989) Partially identified econometric models. Econometric Theory 5, 181–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sargan, J.D. (1983) Identification and lack of identification. Econometrica 51, 1605–1633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sentana, E. (2015) Finite Underidentification. CEMFI Working paper, 1508.Google Scholar
Silvennoinen, A. & Teräsvirta, T. (2009) Multivariate GARCH models. In Andersen, T.G., Davis, R.A., Kreiss, J.-P., & Mikosch, T. (eds.), Handbook of Financial Time Series, pp. 201–229. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staiger, D. & Stock, J.H. (1997) Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments. Econometrica 65, 557–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stock, J.H. & Wright, J.H. (2000) GMM with weak identification. Econometrica 68, 1055–1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Lee and Liao supplementary material

Appendix

Download Lee and Liao supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 2.4 MB